search for: wkb

...st of it's time (99-100%!) in iowait. Here is some output of iostat on an actually "idle" machine, running 3 MS Windows clients, all guest OS's are just sitting doing almost nothing, not even a antivirus program installed: Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 33.80 0.60 76.80 2.40 443.20 11.51 110.46 1269.85 12.93 100.04 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.10 0.00 1.50 75.98 0.00 22.42 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s...

...SAN with multiple paths. I am specifying a device list that just grabs the bits related to the multi path device: $ iostat -dxkt 1 2 sdf sdg sdh sdi dm-7 dm-8 dm-9 Linux 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 (db21b.den.sans.org) 06/20/2014 Time: 02:30:23 PM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sdf 0.66 52.32 3.57 34.54 188.38 347.52 28.13 0.14 3.62 0.87 3.31 sdg 0.66 52.29 3.57 34.56 189.79 347.48 28.18 0.14 3.72 0.87 3.32 sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00...

Hi, I have high IO-Wait on the ods (ceph), the osd are running a v3.1-rc9 kernel. I also experience high IO-rates, around 500IO/s reported via iostat. Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.80 0.00 62.40 18.35 0.04 5.29 0.00 5.29 5.29 3.60 sdb 0.00 249.80 0.40 669.60 1.60 4118.40 12.30 87.47 130.56 15.00 130.63 1.01 67.40...

Hi, folks, I''m attempting to run an e-mail server on Xen. The e-mail system is Novell GroupWise, and it serves about 250 users. The disk volume for the e-mail is on my SAN, and I''ve attached the FC LUN to my Xen host, then used the "phy:/dev..." method to forward the disk through to the domU. I''m running into an issue with high I/O wait on the box (~250%)

...---------------------------------------- This was sent from one of the techs working the problem: I think I located the problem. Collecting iostat data during the last lockup yielded the following information. Time: 03:20:38 PM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 0.00 3.09 0.00 24.74 0.00 12.37 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdb 0.00 0.00 85.57 0.00 684.54 0.00 342.27 0.00 8.00 1.03 12.06 12.04 102.99 Time: 03:20:39 PM Device: rrqm/s wrqm...

With a recent stable FreeBSD freebie.xs4all.nl 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Aug 31 14:17:04 CEST 2003 root@freebie.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBIE i386 and a recent mbmon build: xmbmon-203 I'm now getting interesting results: wkb@freebie ~: mbmon Temp.= 255.0, 240.0, 255.0; Rot.= 11250, 270000, 225000 Vcore = 1.52, 3.15; Volt. = 3.20, 5.08, 15.50, -0.00, -0.00 Temp.= 255.0, 240.0, 255.0; Rot.= 11250, 270000, 225000 Vcore = 1.57, 3.20; Volt. = 3.20, 5.05, 15.50, -0.00, -0.00 ^C wkb@freebie ~: I'm pretty sure it is...

...inimum is set at 1200Kbits/second. However, in testing, if I set that for a VNIC, the domU gets no traffic at all (maybe the occassional packet). Is the minimum too low? If I set a maximum of 2000Kbits/second, I get this from nicstat (expecting around 250Kbytes/s total: Time Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0 73.65 1471.3 74.00 62.21 0.00 04:35:43 xvm15_0 161.6 5.92 112.0 82.24 1477.4 73.68 68.60 0.00 What is the expected accuracy of the bandwidth limiting? I''m using b111. thanks john

...inimum is set at 1200Kbits/second. However, in testing, if I set that for a VNIC, the domU gets no traffic at all (maybe the occassional packet). Is the minimum too low? If I set a maximum of 2000Kbits/second, I get this from nicstat (expecting around 250Kbytes/s total: Time Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0 73.65 1471.3 74.00 62.21 0.00 04:35:43 xvm15_0 161.6 5.92 112.0 82.24 1477.4 73.68 68.60 0.00 What is the expected accuracy of the bandwidth limiting? I''m using b111. thanks john

...en climbs to 100% and stays there most of the time. at first I tougth it was because I was using file-backed disks, so deleted those and changed to LVM, but the situation did't improve. Here's an iostat output from within the DomU: Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util xvda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xvda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xvda2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0....

...ile server. Every time we try to copy some large file to the storage-based file system, the disk utilization see-saws up to 100% to several seconds of inactivity, to climb up again to 100% and so forth. Here are a snip from the iostat -kx 1: Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sdb1 0.00 133811.00 0.00 1889.00 0.00 513660.00 543.84 126.24 65.00 0.47 89.40 sdb1 0.00 138.61 0.00 109.90 0.00 29845.54 543.14 2.54 54.32 0.37 4.06 sdb1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00...

...ee, 591456 used, 402012 buff/cache KiB Swap: 1048572 total, 990776 free, 57796 used. 353468 avail Mem iostat: avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0,00 0,00 0,00 50,00 0,00 50,00 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util xvda 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 xvdb 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00...

...944 0 0 0 0 33 69 1 1 98 0 0 0 592 189844 381732 537944 0 0 0 0 24 32 0 0 100 0 0 0 592 190340 381732 537944 0 0 0 0 28 42 0 0 100 0 iostat -x 1 (excerpt) Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 171.00 0.00 124.00 0.00 2368.00 0.00 1184.00 19.10 0.14 1.13 0.02 0.20 sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdc 0.00 171.00 0.00...

...o check which process and which file is taking up disk IO? or see what is being written to the disk? i'm very puzzled as the amount of writes is 10 times higher than the reads; and I can't figure out what the writes are for. Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz sda3 2.20 32.94 2.12 17.42 34.54 407.74 17.27 203.87 22.63 avgqu-sz await svctm %util 1.28 65.38 5.10 9.97 Is it normal for the %util to be 9.97% for the above reads/ writes on a U320 drive? or perhaps i have a badly misconfigured server? the drive is...

...help. I still get confused with the output of 'iostat', the manual seems too abstract, or high-level, for me. Let's post the output first: avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %idle 5.70 0.00 3.15 91.15 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util /dev/sdb1 0.60 4.70 12.60 1.50 105.60 49.60 52.80 24.80 11.01 1.54 10.92 8.65 12.20 I'll ask about the rrqm/s, r/s, rsec/s, avgrq-sz, avgqu-sz, await, svctm and %util in the above output. First question: How many physical d...

...r performance issues? Right now, I?m running ?iostat -dkxt 30? re-directed to a file. I intend to let this run for a day or so, and write a script to produce some statistics. Here is one iteration from the iostat process: Time: 09:37:28 AM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13 607.40 11.27 0.89 8.27 7.27 78.35 sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sda2 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13...

Hi, please record IMAP rawlog from the client session to see what the client requests and what dovecot responds. https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog <https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog> Sami > On 4 Dec 2019, at 10.44, J. Echter via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Am 03.12.19 um 12:32 schrieb J. Echter via dovecot: >> Hi, >>

..._?^D?^]z?tH??r?u}?p$?(??^N?F^O{|???q? ^L?8<"???^D4??q@???5=^?^C^@^@??24 ??^HG??^@^@^@^@??24??^P^@^@^@????^P^@^@^@??24R(?LQ(.?/J??? ???_~?Wi^6P^S^@^@^@??24?j^B^@^@^@???h^B^@^@^@??24??+^@^@^@??24E??^L9`^A^@^@^@??2??^F^@^@^@???h^C^@^@^@??2?E^G^@^@^@??2?^O^Tm^@^@^@^@??2?^P3+ ej`0T?^E^@^@^@??2^?^WKB?^$ ? ^P^F^@^@^@^@??2?(^W???? ^Y`iff`?0^@^@^@^@??2?(9 ^X`dfdhb?0^@^@^@^@??2?@O?^VX^R1^@^@^@??2?%+^@^@^@^@???$+^@^@^@^@????%+^@^@^@^@????HV??? 1575451333.497661 ^@^@^@????HVX^Z?3Y^A^@^@^@????HV^D??^@^@^@^@???0A^OJK,A?????? ^@^@^@???0?^F%^@^@^@?? Am 04.12.19 um 09:49 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot:...

...^]z?tH??r?u}?p$?(??^N?F^O{|???q? ^L?8<"???^D4??q@???5=^?^C^@^@??24 ??^HG??^@^@^@^@??24??^P^@^@^@????^P^@^@^@??24R(?LQ(.?/J??? > ???_~?Wi^6P^S^@^@^@??24?j^B^@^@^@???h^B^@^@^@??24??+^@^@^@??24E??^L9`^A^@^@^@??2??^F^@^@^@???h^C^@^@^@??2?E^G^@^@^@??2?^O^Tm^@^@^@^@??2?^P3+ ej`0T?^E^@^@^@??2^?^WKB?^$ > ? > > ^P^F^@^@^@^@??2?(^W ^Y`iff`?0^@^@^@^@??2?(9 ^X`dfdhb?0^@^@^@^@??2?@O?^VX^R1^@^@^@??2?%+^@^@^@^@???$+^@^@^@^@????%+^@^@^@^@????HV??? > 1575451333.497661 ^@^@^@????HVX^Z?3Y^A^@^@^@????HV^D??^@^@^@^@???0A^OJK,A ^@^@^@???0?^F%^@^@^@?? > > > Am 04.12.19 um 09...

...ical volumes (it was a physical system i migrated to a vm). The partitions are formatted with reiserfs (The system is already some years old, at that time reiserfs was popular ...). I use iostat on the guest: This is a typical snapshot: Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util vda 0.00 3.05 0.00 2.05 0.00 20.40 19.90 0.09 44.59 31.22 6.40 dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.55 0.00 18.20 8.00 0.24 52.31 7.74 3.52 dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0....

Hello, I have strange behaviour on a server that I can't get a handle on. I have a reasonably powerful server running VMware server 1.0.4-56528. It has a RAID5 build with mdadm on 5 SATA drives. Masses of ram and 2 XEON CPUs. But it stutters. Example : fire up vi, press and keep finger on i. After filling 2-3 lines, the display is stopped for 2-12 seconds. Then they continue. This