Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "with_gnutl".
Did you mean:
with_gnutls
2018 Jun 01
2
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:17:44AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:21:54PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:06:25AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/29/2018 09:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> > > On 05/29/2018 03:38 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> > > > On Fri,
2018 Jun 01
0
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...are some who run the builds themselves
> and doesn't want gnutls on their system. I can't think of a reason for having
> it and not linking libvirt with it.
I should clarify - I've no objection to making GNUTLS mandatory at configure
time - just that we need to continue to have WITH_GNUTLS conditionals in some
parts of the code in order to support the setuid build without GNUTLS. So we
might be able to remove some of the WITH_GNUTLS bits, but not all of them.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org...