search for: winnings

i am getting closer!! now when i run the program (as root), wine --debugmsg +file,+dosfs tc2000.exe i get a messagebox: 'Files were missing that are required for TeleChart 2000. Telechart 2000 will attempt to restore your system.' it then bombs-out: Run-time error '429': ActiveX component can't create object' the only modification to config was i added

Hi, In our company we are currently running a Samba server and Windows XP clients. At the moment we are having problems with mapping Samba shares in Windows. Shares are being mapped through a windows startup script, which executes net use (with the option persistent:no) command. For most users this works most of the time, nevertheless it often fails, the exect reason for this isn't clear

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Shane <arlenslambert at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arlenslambert at gmail.com Attachment #134 is|0 |1 patch|

Patch 1 moves the v2v/fake-virtio-win and v2v/fake-virt-tools directories to the recently created test-data/ hierarchy. This is just refactoring with no functional change at all. Patches 2-4 then extend the available (fake) virtio-win drivers: - Patch 2 adds all of the drivers from the virtio-win RPM. - Patch 3 adds all of the drivers from the virtio-win ISO (which are different from the

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 24 +++++- libswfdec/swfdec_shape_parser.c | 4 - test/dump.c | 3 test/trace/Makefile.am | 9 ++ test/trace/movieclip-version-5.swf |binary test/trace/movieclip-version-5.swf.trace | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hi, I am not able to access the local CIFS share using samba on unix machine. It is returning with Access Denied. Please see the attachment for more details. Thanks, Dhyan -------------- next part -------------- 03:09:50.311663 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > 10.213.132.83.64001: P 339078270:339078322(52) ack 1209710857 win 9648 03:09:50.311694 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh >

Hi, I''m using drbfire to send a "DRbUndumped" ActiveRecord object from the server to the client, through an ADSL line of 4Mbits/s download, and 600Kbits/s upload. I was afraid there would be too many round-trips between the client and the server, and unfortunately this is true: Server code: ------------ #!/usr/local/bin/ruby require ''rubygems'' require

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627 Summary: NATed TCP-connections fail arbitrarily Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

Excuse me in advance for my poor english I have noted a small bug on OpenSSH 3.5p1. When user root is not permitted to log in a system (PermitRoot no) and a correct password is submitted for it to server, a RST packet is issued from server to client: [root at xxx root]# ssh victim root at victim's password: Permission denied, please try again. root at victim's password: Permission

---------------------------------------------------- Server : Athlon 64 3000+ ; 512MB Ram ; lots of disks ; nforce3 chipset ; integrated nvidia gigabit NIC. Gentoo 2.6.15 linux 64-bits ; Samba 3.0.14a-r2 ---------------------------------------------------- Clients : Laptop with Centrino Pentium-M, 100 Mbps NIC, running Windows XP Family Desktop with Athlon 64 3200+ ; 1G DDR Dual Channel

Hi, I have two model, challenge(embeds_many :tasks) and task(embedded_in :challenge), finally database structue is like this { "_id" : ObjectId("4db8b0524f0b495c3a7dbba4"), "title" : "Testing1", "created" : ISODate("2011-12-12T00:00:00Z"), "tasks" : [ { "name" : "task no 1",

Hello List, I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want to make sure the name resolution arrangement is the best for the network. Setup : network 1 + Samba1<<SAME IP range>> <L2 VPN> network2 <<SAME IP range>> + Samba2 I have noticed that the wins server and wins support options are non-inclusive. Samba2: name resolve order =

Hi XEN-Community, I''m trying to build the actual version of the XEN gplpv (win-pv) drivers. I use the a Windows XP machine with the WinDDK 7600.16385.1 and Wix 3.0 like suggested in the BUILD.txt The building process itself seems to be working, at least there are no compiler error. (I just made the "makedist") Instead, the final *.msi files and the drivers itself are nowhere

Hello, I have upgraded and installed the latest and greatest Samba RPM onto a Red Hat V9 computer. This is my Wins server. I can find computers on every VLAN but not the WINS server itself. On the Wins server I tried this command and received the correct response nmblookup -R -U <Ip of Wins server> <netbios name> I received an error message on the Wins server when I do a find

In order to test the copying of virtio-win drivers into the guest during v2v, create a set of fake virtio-win drivers and make use of them in the corresponding v2v tests. Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> --- tests/fake-virtio-win/drivers/i386/Win7/netkvm.cat | 1 + tests/fake-virtio-win/drivers/i386/Win7/netkvm.inf | 1 +

In order to test the copying of virtio-win drivers into the guest during v2v, create a set of fake virtio-win drivers and make use of them in the corresponding v2v tests. Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> --- changes since v1: - moved fake-virtio-win under v2v - referred to fake-virtio-win stuff via $PWD in test scripts - updated Makefile to package the newly added files

Hello, Documentation states that one should set up only one Samba server as WINS server. While NT's TCP/IP setup has two entrys, one for a primary and one for a secondary WINS server I wonder why there should be only one Samba WINS server. Has anyone tried this with two Samba WINS servers? Did you suffer from any interferences. I did and the machines are running perfectly smooth. Did I

Hi, I have been doing some tests using hping2 and TCP SYN pings targeting local and remote hosts from two FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p10 and one Linux 2.4.18 host. The three machines have the same hardware configuration and have been running for 6 months now. The average load isnt too high (usually 0.01 to 0.15) on the FreeBSD machines. Here is the output from hping2 (excuse me the line wrap),

I am a little confused. In the smb.conf man page under the "name resolve order" section, it states that setting "name resolve order = wins" will be ignored if the "wins server" parameter is not set. Elsewhere in the man page it states that if you set "wins support = yes" then you cannot set the wins server parameter. Does this mean that a machine that is

Hi there, I've got a document with 6 sides and 2 graphics which I'm trying to open with Word 2003 through wine 1.0-rc3. Whenever I do so it opens, but the graphics are blank and I get an error message: "insufficient memory to display or print graphic"; the same document opens with no problem under Win 2k on the same machine, same office installation cd; Architecture: Athlon