search for: windle

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 133 matches for "windle".

Did you mean: windl
2000 Nov 29
4
RPC exception: "Who are you failed (dce / rpc)"
Hello, with OpenSSH_2.3.0p1 running in HP-UX 11.00 I noticed that the "SD commands" (like "swcopy") produce the following error when being logged in via SSH: ERROR: RPC exception: "Who are you failed (dce / rpc)" 11/29/00 11:20:18 MET Ideas? Regards, Ulrich P.S. Not subscribed to the list
2015 Dec 22
1
Antw: Re: Beginner's questions/suggestions
>>> Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net> schrieb am 21.12.2015 um 19:51 in Nachricht <CAEW_RkshUM55uwdvU6DsE17pLZki651Xvvu7d2Y6jObePXZwCQ at mail.gmail.com>: > On 21 December 2015 at 04:31, Ulrich Windl > <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >> opusenc does not display the file name it processes. In Lunux when you use > some batch processing,
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
Hello Jean-Marc, As an example, I am using the output of opus encoder to store the file as the following format and read back the same during decode process, without having much overhead. (Thought it would be useful to put a picture rather than running text) [image: Inline image 2] Regards Amit On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello
2016 May 13
0
Ogg Format
The format you're describing here actually has *more* overhead than Ogg, not less. It's also unseakable, not robust errors, and without support for metadata. I'm not sure why you would want that. It's not like you're forced to include much data in the Ogg metadata (which seems to be the source of all the overhead you're seeing). Jean-Marc On 05/12/2016 11:51 AM, Amit
2017 Apr 24
2
2 patches related to silk_biquad_alt() optimization
Hi Ulrich, As Jean-mark recommended, we created "--enable-check-asm" config option to active OPUS_CHECK_ASM macros in the optimization, where the C function is called inside and the results of C and optimization functions are compared when encoding/decoding the real audio files. Thanks, Linfeng On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl at
2016 May 12
3
Ogg Format
On 05/12/2016 10:35 AM, Amit Ashara wrote: > For HMI panels, except for the capture pattern and a single page segment > entry, other fields are not important, and which results in almost 7% > overhead for a 20ms raw frame encoded with Opus. I'm not sure how you get a 7% overhead. In most uses I've seen, the overhead is more around 1%. > At the same time the > file
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
The overhead of Ogg (in file size) is pretty small and it's efficient enough for most applications (and uses far less CPU than the codec anyway). If anything, you might want to look at optimizing the existing Ogg implementation (e.g. like Tremor did in the context of Vorbis). Of course, you're always free to design a new container, but I doubt it's worth it and it's a lot of work
2015 Apr 30
4
MP3/Vorbis/Opus: What I think I hear
Hi! Sorry, I know the rules for comparing objective subjective listening impressions, but I'd like to know whether from the algorithmic or implementer's point of view the following personal impressions can be confirmed: Comparing MP3 with Vorbis at rather high bitrates, I had the impression the Vorbis sounded more crispy, while MP3 sounded somewhat softened. I preferred Vorbis for that
2015 Dec 21
2
Beginner's questions/suggestions
Hi! I was just trying libopus0-1.1-3.2.x86_64 and opus-tools-0.1.9-3.2.x86_64 on openSUSE Leap, and I was wondering: opusenc does not display the file name it processes. In Lunux when you use some batch processing, it might be interesting! Example output for "for f in *.wav;do opusenc --bitrate 160 $f ${f%.wav}.opus; done": ---just on file--- Encoding using libopus 1.1 (audio)
2017 Apr 12
3
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
The last line of the example in droplevels' manual page seems to be incorrect to me. I think it should read: "table(droplevels(aq$Month))". Amazingly (I don't understand) both variants seem to produce the same result (R 3.3.3): --- > aq <- transform(airquality, Month = factor(Month, labels = month.abb[5:9])) > aq <- subset(aq, Month != "Jul") >
2024 Aug 09
0
[EXT] Re: Re: Opus Tools -- low bitrates, new features in 1.5, "expect-loss"
On Aug 09 11:58:33, u.windl at ukr.de wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of Jan Stary > > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 12:00 PM > > To: Petr Pa??zek <petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com> > > Cc: opus at xiph.org > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [opus] Re: Opus Tools -- low bitrates, new features in 1.5, > >
2003 Sep 04
3
OpenSSH 3.5p1 (HP version): permissions of public identity
Hello, I just received thes odd messages from HP-UX Secure Shell A.03.50.000. (OpenSSH 3.5p1): # ssh-add id_rsa.pub 5215: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 5215: @ WARNING: UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE! @ 5215: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 5215: Permissions 0644 for 'id_rsa.pub' are too open. 5215: It is
2009 Mar 16
2
Q: [OT] concatenating audio files
Hi, this is a bit off-topic, but maybe you can help me: When extracting the autio track of a concert on video DVD, I noticed that the *.VOB files each contained only about 16 minutes of music, resulting in multiple files. I extracted to flac for further processing, but now I wonder how to make one continuous sound stream of those: Can I simple concatenate the flac files to make on big file
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
Hello Jean-Marc, Assuming that a 48KHz, 20ms 8-bit linear PCM data which is 960 bytes is compressed to 64 bytes (for assumption). The with the Oggs header (4 byte) + 1 segment entry (which is the size of the segment itself) + 64 bytes will amount to (4+1)/(4+1+64) = ~7.2%. This when compared with the original Oggs container itself for the same data payload size (26+1)/(26+1+64) = ~29.6%. Even if
2016 May 13
2
Antw: Re: Ogg Format
>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 17:47 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sgjbsxQY-=VnhQrKiGeTcFSRr1wxOPUhNyCQF8Piuahow at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > Assuming that a 48KHz, 20ms 8-bit linear PCM data which is 960 bytes is > compressed to 64 bytes (for assumption). The with the Oggs header (4 byte) Actually what I don't
2007 Feb 20
8
xen time sync problem
Hi, I am facing problem in sync time within DomU with Dom0. After gone through mailing lists, I have set /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock to 0. But still DomU are not syncing their time :-S Machine using kernel-xen-2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 xen-3.0.3-3.fc6 xen-libs-3.0.3-3.fc6 Please advice to solve this weird problem, Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list
2000 Nov 06
1
openssh-2.1.1p1 on HP-UX 11.00: processes hanging around
Hello, I'm unsure what kind of problem this is, but If I use eval $(ssh-agent) ssh-add scp ... (several times) ssh-add -D exit There are many ssh processes around in the system: UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND root 4266 1 0 11:33:56 pts/0 0:00 /usr/local/bin/ssh -x -oFallBack ToRsh no -oFallBackToRsh no root 1876 9788 0 11:11:26 ? 0:01
2017 Apr 11
2
Poor documentation for "adj" and text()
Hi! (I'd like to be able to access your bugzilla, BTW) The documentation for parameter "adj" of text() in R 3.3.3 is hard to understand (unless you know what it does already): "adj one or two values in [0, 1] which specify the x (and optionally y) adjustment of the labels. On most devices values outside that interval will also work." What is the meaning of the values? I
2017 Apr 12
2
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
Hello, Inline. Em 12-04-2017 16:40, Henric Winell escreveu: > (Let's keep the discussion on-list -- I've added back R-devel.) > > On 2017-04-12 16:39, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>>>> Henric Winell <nilsson.henric at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.04.2017 >>>>> um 15:35 in >> Nachricht <b66fe849-bb8d-f00d-87e5-553f866d57e0 at gmail.com>:
2016 May 12
2
Antw: Re: Ogg Format
>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 11.05.2016 um 19:32 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sjvTWMBMMCJ8HQcYmbv1BtNt54CgpqWaGNm02MWrKcxaQ at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > So for the moment we can assume that this method is also OK to use? > > On Embedded Systems, both SRAM and Flash can be a restricting factor > besides the compute time. To