search for: wilme

Hi, thx for the reply. Unfortunately that is not a simplified version of the problem. You have a function, call it and get the result (numeric in, numeric out in that case). For simplicity lets use the "return" case: ## foobar<-function(x) { return(sqrt(x)) }(2) ## which is a function (numeric in, numeric out) which is defined, then gets called and the return value is a function

Hi, I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour of my R installation on the evaluation of anonymous functions. minimal working example ### f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(2) class(f) f(3) f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(4)(5) f(6) ### leads to ### > f<-function(x) { + print( 2*x ) + }(2) > > class(f) [1] "function"

Hi, Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > Are you saying that > f1 <- function(x) log(x) > f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) > should act differently? yes. Or more precisely: I would expect that. "Should" implies, that I want to change something. I just want to understand the behavior (or file a bug, if this would have been one). As I wrote, in e.g.

Are you saying that f1 <- function(x) log(x) f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) should act differently? Using 'return' complicates the matter, because it affects evaluation, not parsing. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > thx for the reply. Unfortunately

Hi, is there a way to get the number of all possible matches for a specific query? Some api call like Xapian::doccount Xapian::Enquire::get_number_of_matches(); Best wishes Wilm

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

Here is a simplified version of your problem > { sqrt }(c(2,4,8)) [1] 1.414214 2.000000 2.828427 Do you want that to act differently? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour > of my R

Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > > Are you saying that f1 <- function(x) log(x) f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) should act differently? yes. But that would mean that {log} would act differently than log. I suppose it is a matter of taste, but I say yuck. As for 'return', don't use it if you want readable code. It is like a goto but worse. It

Hi all, I have data which is represented as a histogram and want to add more data / another histogram to this plot using another color. That is I need to superimpose multiple histograms. But have no idea how to do this. Can anybody please give me a hint? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Wilm Institut fuer Physikalische Biologie Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf

Hi! I''m new here! I downloaded shorewall because I want to set up a firewall and Webmin already has a module for it. (I love Webmin!) When I went to start shorewall I got the message that it needs ip. I''m running Slackware and apparently ip is not included with it. Would somone please help me out and let me know where I can download ip from? Thanks. Jim

Hello R-devel, I want to write extensions for R in C (maybe C++ and Fortran later) and it works fine, but there is one problem, which I cannot solve (in my view). I want to handle a matrix from R in C. For arrays there is "as.double(...)", but nothing for a matrix. I searched a while, but didn't find something. Last I looked at the source code of e1071 and of the core itself and

There was a lengthy power failure here in Shoreline this morning and my firewall did not come back up when power was restored. The firewall is now up and service to the server has been restored. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \

Is it possible to filter HTTP signatures/headers with SHOREWALL ? or is there addon for it ? take care *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Stingray *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email

hi, i have a strange situtation. i try to connect to my machine with ssh and the packets are dropped but i have at the top of my rules an accept. the configuration looks like: rules-file: ----------- ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 - TCPDUMP-log: ------------ 12:16:08.153934 84.153.98.30.1322 > [my-destination-machine].ssh: S 3717288415:3717288415(0) win 64240 <mss

Hi Alex, and thanks for your time. Probably not. The servers are only configured like they where when they where parallel to the fw. Just the default gateway, same as for the external interface on the fw. That''s what the documentation instructed to configure the servers using arp. But is it required with extra configuration on the server connected via proxy arp? Or is it some parameter

Hi to all. I recently upgraded to shorewall ver 2.3 from 2.0 so I could explore the multiple ISP/dual default route setup feature of version 2.3, I also upgraded iptables from 1.2 to 1.3 (rpm-based install) but when I tried to start shorewall it terminates and I noticed it''s giving me this error iptables: No chain/target/match by that name ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A

Thanks Alexander Wilms ... that fixed the problem ... YOHOOO.....I'' am so happy Rob

Hi, Xapian uses a directory as standard storage backend. Is that possible to pack everything in a file (a tar file for example), and to tell libxapian to open it (by telling him at which offset are the different stuff)? If this is not possible yet, would that be technically possible to implement such a feature? How complex would that be? Kind regards Emmanuel -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline &

I am making a new box to test with and was trying to install shorewall via rpm. So I download the shorewall 2.2.5 rpm and issue a rpm -ivh shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch.rpm. I then get an error: error: Failed dependencies: which is needed by shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch So as you can see there are no dependency issues. I thought I saw this on the mailing list a while ago but I just searched for it I did

Hello, You will find in attachment the layout of my current physical configuration. For now, the Cable ISP is not used. Since it is a dynamic ISP, my mailserver is rejected and my domain name registers on blacklists like ORDB and al. I want it to be used as a default gateway except for my mail server that would be seen as coming from my "honest" ADSL ISP. Here is