search for: willig

...tead abort the program, and replay the trace. This will allow us to look at the precise call sequence that causes the issue. What is the numerical value of ve->vertex_buffer_index when it's >= num_vtxbufs? [What about num_vtxbufs?] Cheers, -ilia On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Arno Willig <arno.willig at hertz.st> wrote: > > Hi, > > I experience a crash in the nouveau part of the mesa driver: > > src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_vbo.c > > in function: > > void nv30_vbo_validate(struct nv30_context *nv30) > > > Sometimes, ve->verte...

Hi there. I thy to compile asterisk-oh323-0.6.3a but it fail in the make command. I have the pwlib-v1_6_6-1 and openh323-v1_13_5-1 as saying in the README file of the packet asterisk-oh323-0.6.3a I do make and this is the error: # make for x in wrapper asterisk-driver; do make -C $x all || exit 1 ; done make: *** No rule to make target `ccflags'. Stop. make: *** No rule to make target

By any chance are there any free checkbook apps that have been written for Ruby? Looking to free myself from Gnucash/Grisbi/Quicken but don''t quite have the skills/time to make my own app. Has anyone done this and want to share? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m using the following configuration in the database.yml to connect to Oracle, however I could not connect while the settings seems to be correct: development_oracle: adapter: oci host: 127.0.0.1:8080/XE username: rubydb password: rubyrails What is wrong here? Can anyonbe help me? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

You could try to use the native mp3 support for MOH if you really want mp3 support. It is a lot better than using mpg123 IMHO. mpg123 kept doing nasty things to my system :) See http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20config%20musicon hold.conf there is a section about the native support. Guillaume > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Gofferje

...character vars at the beginning of _install_packages and to pass a flag to the dirchmod call as so that 'S_IWGRP' (the 00020 "write by group" permission) can be set. I would be happy to write such a patch (including documentation updates) if someone from R Core can signal willigness to look at it. Thanks, Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com

...:" is a plausibility argument only. It is not meaningful until you can show this happening in real source code from real applications that are compiler warning free and static analysis warning free. Hal already conceded that this is never likely to happen in for example SPEC benchmarks, I’m willig to bet it never happens even in a highly abstracted application like llvm itself. Saying “The C++ language lets me assume that that won’t happen, & optimize on that basis” is an assumption that that’s what the user wants, but you haven’t asked you’ve just assumed, and AFAICT it is an incorrec...

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:40 AM Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Dave, > Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead > code elimination, > Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code > elimination ? > I haven't actually looked at how optimizations on the basis of the code being UB-free

Dave, Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead code elimination, Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code elimination ? Yes, speculatively hoisting code requires it to be UB-free, but that has nothing to do with UBCE deleting entire blocks of code because of the existence of UB. The former requires an analysis proving UB-absense, the