search for: willing

We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to set out the expected upgrade strategy and try to polish it to be as user friendly as possible. We're getting this out here now, because there was quite a bit of concern and confusion regarding the upgrades between 3.x and 4.0+. --- ## Background Gluster-4.0 will bring a newer management daemon, GlusterD-2.0 (GD2),

if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access volume without any challenge? I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote: > We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to > set out the expected upgrade strategy and try to polish it to be as > user

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=845 Summary: checking for LIBNFNETLINK... configure: error: Package requirements (libnfnetlink >= 0.0.41) were not met: Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > volume without any challenge? > > I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? Very short answer, yes. Your volumes will remain the same. And you will continue to access them the same way. RIO (as DHT2 is now known as) developers

Hi again, I am still trying to run Dovecot but persistently get the errors Corrupted transaction log file and Lost transaction log file. I cannot find any reference to this problem that will help, I have checked the file permissions and locks and cannot see any obvious cause. Could somebody please advise what I might be doing wrong or direct me to somewhere else that I can ask for or find help.

Hello everyone, The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the results to become visible. No change is required at this time on any of the builders. The bot owners could upgrade the buildbot on build computers later, at their convenience, as this is not on the critical path. We are going to upgrade the staging bot first. Then, once that is stable and all detected issues are resolved, we

does RIO improves folder listing and rebalance, when compared to 3.x? if yes, do you have any performance data comparing RIO and DHT? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > > volume

Hello Everyone I'm going to rebuild GIT mirrors to provide more consistent tags / branches. Basically, the contents will be the same, but naming scheme will change. So, trunk will go to svn/trunk, branches/* will got to svn/branches/* and tags/* will go to svn/tags/* This might break some scripts, etc. So, if anyone has some objections wrt this - please let me know. PS: First clang.git

Hi, I have a KVM server running on Centos 7.5. [root at kvm2 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) Qemu packages are from Centos repository. [root at kvm2 ~]# rpm -qa|grep qemu libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-3.9.0-14.el7_5.7.x86_64 qemu-img-1.5.3-156.el7_5.5.x86_64 qemu-kvm-common-1.5.3-156.el7_5.5.x86_64 ipxe-roms-qemu-20170123-1.git4e85b27.el7_4.1.noarch

Hi R users I like to generate a certain type of matrix. If there are 10 variables, the matrix will have nrow=10, ncol=((10/2))/5+1. so the resulting matrix's dimension 10 by 2. If there are 50 variables the dimension of the resulting matrix will be 50 by 6. The arrangement of elements of this matrix is important to me and I can't figure out how to arrange elements. If I have 20

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:17, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at pomec.net> wrote: Can you post what they are missing? Without that info it is not clear what the problem is (I seem to have several of them installed on an upgrade so I am not sure what blocked you). Stephen, Here is the full result. Part of the problem I am having is that this was a development lab testing machine, and I have some

It seems the mail you are referring to never made the list: it's not in the archives and not in my mailbox. Take a look here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-December/thread.html It's probably still waiting for moderation. On 07-01-13 17:07, Olivier BLIN wrote: > On 29/12/2012 00:06, Olivier Blin wrote: >> When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile

I'm hoping someone can point me to what is wrong here, I can't figure it out. running "yum update" on my C7.6 box I get: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package glibc-debuginfo.x86_64 0:2.17-260.el7_6.4 will be updated ---> Package glibc-debuginfo.x86_64 0:2.17-260.el7_6.5 will be an update ---> Package glibc-debuginfo-common.x86_64

When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile needs to be generated in the build tree and should point to the proper paths for include directories and html footer. The generated api files to install should also be taken from the build tree instead of the source tree. --- configure.ac | 1 + doc/Doxyfile | 1220 --------------------------------------------------

Hi all, I wanted to update my CentOS 7 install this morning and I started getting the errors from below. Any ideas on a fix? They seem to be related to cinnamon which I actually don't use at all (the machine was prepared by our IT at work and they install both Gnome and Cinnamon by default). Since I don't use it, I guess an option would be to remove it altogether and then I will

When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile needs to be generated in the build tree and should point to the proper paths for include directories and html footer. The generated api files to install should also be taken from the build tree instead of the source tree. --- configure.ac | 1 + doc/Doxyfile | 1220 --------------------------------------------------

Will the various client packages (centos in my case) be able to automatically handle the upgrade vs new install decision, or will we be required to do something manually to determine that? It?s a little unclear that things will continue without interruption because of the way you describe the change from GD1 to GD2, since it sounds like it stops GD1. Early days, obviously, but if you could

Just so I am clear the upgrade process will be as follows: upgrade all clients to 4.0 rolling upgrade all servers to 4.0 (with GD1) kill all GD1 daemons on all servers and run upgrade script (new clients unable to connect at this point) start GD2 ( necessary or does the upgrade script do this?) I assume that once the cluster had been migrated to GD2 the glusterd startup script will be smart

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Darrell Budic <budic at onholyground.com> wrote: > Will the various client packages (centos in my case) be able to > automatically handle the upgrade vs new install decision, or will we be > required to do something manually to determine that? We should be able to do this with CentOS (and other RPM based distros) which have well split glusterfs

I have reached a development plateau and now want to integrate some of the rails niceties that I passed over to get the system online. I am fooling with migrations. I am using postgresql. I put in my migration script (at the end of the ''up'' method, the following raw sql code... # set up primary key restratints for PostgreSQL execute ''ALTER TABLE ONLY