search for: waterfalled

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 137 matches for "waterfalled".

Did you mean: waterfall
2008 Oct 31
4
Help needed with Waterfall plot
Hi friends, I need suggestions/directions on how to producing a waterfall plot for present extend of change in tumour size for a set of respondents in a study.  Example of use of waterfall plot is in the following slides presented at ASCO 2007 by Axel Grothey. Link is
2009 Feb 03
2
ThinkCell type waterfall charts in R?
Hi all, with PowerPoint and ThinkCell one can draw something they call waterfall chart and it looks like this: http://www.think-cell.com/products/images/waterfall.gif I found discussions on waterfall charts in the archive of this mailinglist, but unfortunately they looked totally different. Other names for this type of plot seem to be bridge chart, cascade chart, stair case chart, etc. but
2008 Nov 01
2
Hidden line algorithms and a different kind of waterfall
This is not the same as the recent thread on a waterfall graph. I'm thinking about the rolling FFT display used in acoustics and other spectrum analysis tasks. Here's an example of a very fancy 3-D waterfall display: http://www.ultimaserial.com/UltimaWaterfall.html I was just wondering if there are any simple hidden-line tools in R that I could use to draw simple waterfall displays.
2012 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] Need help reading the LLVM Buildbot results
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: >> I don't believe so - I think only a certain sliding window of logs are >> kept (& I don't know of an easy way to view a particular revision >> across the bots either) > > For me a bigger issue has been inability to see a long list of results for a > particular builder (say,
2011 Nov 07
1
Upgraded Buildbot
The Buildbot master software has finally been upgraded to 0.8.5 here: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/waterfall For those of you with Buildbot slave systems, the /private/nut/ URL is no longer necessary - the same username and password will work in the forms on the new pages (for actions like forcing builds, stopping builds, etc.) Hopefully I will soon be able to fix
2008 Nov 05
0
Solution to managing an entire directory in a "waterfall" configuration
The subject may not make a lot of sense so let me try and explain. I''ve searched the archives and come up short so my apologies if this has indeed been addressed before. I have a function that looks like this: define remotedir($mode, $owner, $group, $source, $ensure = directory, $recurse = inf) { file { $name: mode => $mode, owner
2012 Nov 10
6
[LLVMdev] Need help reading the LLVM Buildbot results
>From r167602 and onwards I get a fail in 'make check-all' for llvm+clang, built with gcc-4.7.1 (but not with clang-3.1) on Linux x86_64: Failing Tests (1): Clang :: CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates.cpp clang: /dev/shm/uabpath/master/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:208: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X =
2011 Aug 31
2
Treat an Unquoted Character String as a Data Frame
I have several datasets that come from different studies (fv02 and fv03), they represent different levels (patients and lesions), and they have different patient populations (itt, mitt, mitt3). I wanted to write some code that would pass my three requirements into a function I wrote, produce the output, but not have to require me to also pass a unique plot title or output filename for each
2008 Nov 02
9
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right now (it's an 8 core machine). Currently i have it building x86_64-linux. Setting up a builder/slave for any platform would be trivial. I simply don't have machines running anything but
2015 Sep 29
3
buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 September 2015 at 18:22, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > This buildbot looks like it's been failing since Friday - does anyone > > know/own/care about it? > > Yes, we're looking into it. > > As you probably noticed, debugging ARM buildbots are
2010 Jan 18
2
Buildbot master upgrade
All, If you are looking for the old "waterfall" view, it has moved to here: http://buildbot.ghz.cc/public/nut/waterfall You might have to shift-reload the page to get the new CSS files. There are a bunch of useful views listed here: http://buildbot.ghz.cc/public/nut/ Let me know if you see any room for improvement. - Charles
2017 Jun 09
5
Cannot build Clang/LLVM on Windows with LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB
I am trying to build Clang/LLVM with -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON to reduce the size of toolchain. I am getting LINK error 1181 about `lib\LLVM.lib` not found. After investigating, `lib\LLVM.lib` is supposed to be produced along with `bin\LLVM.dll`. `bin\LLVM.dll` is indeed produced, but it does not contain any exported symbols (10KB only) because LLVM does not use
2020 Oct 13
2
[Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress
2014 Jan 16
1
Reviving the Windows port of NUT
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Emilien KIA wrote: > 2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >> Emilien, >> >> just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! >> We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. > > I am just fixing some bugs
2020 Oct 12
3
[Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me
2020 Oct 08
3
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -
2014 Jan 15
3
Reviving the Windows port of NUT
Emilien, just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. The problem is that we do not have a good branch in Git to work from. The windows_port branch got rebased, but since it has merge commits, it is a bit of a mess. I apologize for
2014 Jul 07
0
[PATCH] Support for ASEM UPS on Linux/i2c
Giuseppe Corbelli <giuseppe.corbelli <at> copanitalia.com> writes: > Nevermind, please try the one attached, just created by > > git diff -p 80d9534 configure.ac data/driver.list.in drivers/Makefile.am > drivers/asem.c > asem.patch > > Just applied it on current master (80d9534a133da170cade150700407920450a9753) > and seems ok. Sorry I did not test this
2012 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Code Ownership - Buildbot
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > kinda random, but do we have a centralized list of all of the > buildbots? I see a lot of different URL's in IRC, but no list so I can > check "all of the waterfalls". I'm not talking about the specific bots > (e.g. llvm-x86_64-ubuntu) but the "fleets"
2008 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] Buildbot now up and new build failures
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Duncan Sands <duncan.sands at math.u-psud.fr> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> I set up a buildbot for llvm at http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/waterfall >> It builds every single revision of llvm, runs the testsuite, and >> reports the results. It takes about 3 minutes per build+test right >> now (it's an 8 core machine). > >