Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "wasmer".
Did you mean:
warmer
2016 Sep 01
2
Dsync config help
...om userdb lookup).
Sep ?1 00:13:42 shaun dovecot: doveadm(a.b.c.d,nobody): Error: dsync-server: User init failed
Sep ?1 00:14:00 shaun dovecot: doveadm(nobody): Error: sync: Failed to start remote dsync-server command: Remote exit_code=75
Jean-Luc
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:02 AM, Jean-Luc Wasmer <dovecot at jl.wasmer.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm trying to sync emails between server A and B.
> A has replicator, aggregator and doveadm.
> B only has doveadm for now.
>
>
> I'm getting the following error:
>
>
> Error: sync: /var...
2016 Aug 28
2
Dsync config help
Hi,
I?m having a hard time with the?http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication
?page.
- for a master-master setup, does the configuration need to be mirrored on both masters?
- after aggregating unrelated sections of the wiki page, there seems to be 3 different values for ?mail_replica":
- "remote?: for SSH
- ?remoteprefix": for SSH wrapper
- ?tcp?: for?TCP connection using
2008 May 15
1
New verbosity in command line flac: progress-silent
Hi,
Would it be possible to add a new verbosity level?
Right now we have totally-silent, silent and no-silent.
The issue I have with "no-silent" is having progress updates when flac is
processing the output of another program (like CD Paranoia). Both programs
will write other each other's output which is not very useful.
If I use "silent", I don't get the final
2003 Feb 18
1
Problem printing long files
Hi,
I have Samba 2.2.5 installed on a 1.5.3 NetBSD.
A HP LaserJet 4000 is connected to this box.
Printing works fine for most files, but long files only have the first 15 pages
or so printed. I don't think it's a problem with the client program since this
appends with both Word and Acrobat.
JL
2016 Sep 07
3
Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)
On 24/08/2016 10:58 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 8/1/2016 om 3:37 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly:
>> In other words, the rules did eventually get propagated across, and
>> based on the file sizes they are complete.
>>
>> But there is obviously something amiss with handling of dates (which
>> in turn may relate to how the system determines that the file on each