search for: warty

I have three machine mounting a samba share on a debian server running 3.0.11 (just updated as 3.0.10 has some serious problems). There's an XP box, and two Ubuntu (debian) PCs, one with Warty (kernel 2.4.21) and Hoary (kernel 2.6.4 / 5). Both Ubunutu machines have the following entry in fstab: \\Server\Documents /home/phill/Documents smbfs user,uid=nobody,gid=phill,guest 0 0 and both are running smbfs, libsmbclient, smbclient and samba-common 3.0.7-1-ubuntu6. Basically with Warty...

...buntu is with apt-get or with | the GUI-based synaptic. Just make yourself sure that both the 'universe' | and 'multiverse' repositories are available in your | /etc/apt/sources.list, something like: | | ### /etc/apt/sources.list (partial view) | deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu warty universe multiverse | deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu warty universe multiverse | ### | | Then, all you have to type is: | | sudo aptitude update | sudo aptitude install r-base r-base-core r-base-latex r-cran-hmisc Or apt-get, or wajig, or ... | On the other hand, if you insist on compil...

check_hotplug fails on one of my machines running ubunto 4.10 "Warty Warhog", due to misparsing the udevinfo version string. The problem is caused by an old version of sed that does not appreciate the regexp. This patch fixes it, and also works on debian unstable and SLES9SP2. Please apply... Signed-Off-By: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org> Signed-Off-By...

...arch boot code I think. > Christoph do you see a problem with that? The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. What do you reckon ? What we want to avoid is to expose any of this to the *end user* or libvirt or any other higher level of the management stack. We really want that stuf...

...arch boot code I think. > Christoph do you see a problem with that? The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. What do you reckon ? What we want to avoid is to expose any of this to the *end user* or libvirt or any other higher level of the management stack. We really want that stuf...

On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 00:05 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > 2- Make virtio use the DMA API with our custom platform-provided > > swiotlb callbacks when needed, that is when not using IOMMU *and* > > running on a secure VM in our case. > > And total NAK the customer platform-provided part of this. We need > a flag passed in from the hypervisor that the device

On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 00:05 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > 2- Make virtio use the DMA API with our custom platform-provided > > swiotlb callbacks when needed, that is when not using IOMMU *and* > > running on a secure VM in our case. > > And total NAK the customer platform-provided part of this. We need > a flag passed in from the hypervisor that the device

I seem to have come to a strange problem getting started on rails. I had everything working in a virtual machine and then set up a seperate machine just for rails developement. It now seems something is broken a little. ruby 1.8.2, rails 0.10.1, postgres, using webrick: i created a table "users", then "generate scaffold User" view localhost/users works fine, shows the

Good afternoon, I''ve two quick questions for the Ruby/Rails community. 1) Do you use Linux for Ruby or Rails development? 2) If you use Linux, which distro do you normally use to develop? Thank you for your input. :-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...a problem with that? > > > > The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a > > small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to > > iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a > > bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu > > one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. > > > > What do you reckon ? > > I think you are right that for the dma limit the hypervisor doesn't seem > to need to know. It's no...

...a problem with that? > > > > The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a > > small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to > > iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a > > bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu > > one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. > > > > What do you reckon ? > > I think you are right that for the dma limit the hypervisor doesn't seem > to need to know. It's no...

...arch boot code I think. > Christoph do you see a problem with that? The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. What do you reckon ? What we want to avoid is to expose any of this to the *end user* or libvirt or any other higher level of the management stack. We really want that stuf...

...gt; Christoph do you see a problem with that? > > The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a > small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to > iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a > bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu > one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. > > What do you reckon ? I think you are right that for the dma limit the hypervisor doesn't seem to need to know. > What we want to avoid is to expose a...

Hi all, I have a Samba configuration that was in place on Ubuntu Warty (samba 3.0.7) workstations to allow winbind to authenticate domain users on them. These computers have since been re-installed with Ubuntu Hoary (samba 3.0.10) with the same configuration. The workstations have been successfully joined to the domain using `net rpc join`. `wbinfo -t` shows that t...

...> > > > > The above could do that yes. Another approach would be to do it from a > > > small virtio "quirk" that pokes a bit in the device to force it to > > > iommu mode when it detects that we are running in a secure VM. That's a > > > bit warty on the virito side but probably not as much as having a qemu > > > one that walks of the virtio devices to change how they behave. > > > > > > What do you reckon ? > > > > I think you are right that for the dma limit the hypervisor doesn't seem > >...

I have a newly-installed Ubuntu linux box that I''m planning to use for wxruby development (thanks for the advice on remote desktops from this group). However, turns out that Ubuntu comes with GTK2.0, annd wxwidgets 2.6 is reportedly better and easier to build than 2.4.2 against this. Before I set off on a potentially fruitless compiling journey, I was wondering if anyone had had

Hello, I have tried to setup Ruby-on-rails on my debian Linux machine and can not get it to run. Maybe someone can help. The following was installed already: - apache2 2.0.54 (and PHP5) - Postgresql 8.1 Now, having the ''unstable'' branch in my /etc/apt/sources.list I did: apt-get install libapache2-mod-ruby and Apache reports a "mod_ruby/1.2.4 Ruby/1.8.4"

Hello! I would first like to appologice if this question does not fit on this mailing-list. I am new to Linux and I tried to compile R on my Ubuntu Warty linux. I followed the instructions in "R Installation and Administration" manual. It seams that there was a problem with "configure", since when running "make" afterward gave me this reply: make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. I have cop...

Hi All, I''ve finally got fed up of struggling with Windows and am on the verge of splashing out on a Macbook for Ruby/Rails development. I''ve seen DHH''s post about it on loudthinking but I wondered if anyone else has any more wisdom... Is it worth it over a powerbook? Any tips on good OSX apps for Rails dev (textmate, i know already)? Anything not working well on

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual