search for: warande

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 107 matches for "warande".

Did you mean: aranda
2002 Mar 07
3
I can't ping across gateway
Hi Who concern, I setup TINC VPN follow these. 192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups) | 192.168.1.1 (eth1) (GW1) 202.44.34.206 (eth0) || Internet || 202.44.45.14 (eth0) (GW2) 192.168.2.1 (eth1)
2001 Dec 13
3
cannot route packet: unknown type 0
Hi! When I try to use tinc I get this message 'Cannot route packet: unknown type 0' when I try to ping or ssh to the box I'm connected to. Below is my setup: ifconfig tun device: -------------------- midkemia Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FD:00:00:00:00 inet addr:192.168.6.1 Bcast:192.168.6.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500
2001 Mar 08
2
Tinc behind firewall?
...ehind the firewall. The other tinc daemon however must be reachable, so you can't have both behind a firewall if they do masquerading. We hope to get TcpOnly back in pre4. ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/ ------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature...
2000 Aug 27
4
[URGENT] tinc has a security hole of about 50 million km^2
Sending your passphrase encrypted is all fine, but tinc sends the key with which it was encrypted about a second later... Anyone being able to intercept these two requests is authorized on the VPN. We need asymmetric authentication _now_. -- Ivo Timmermans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:
2001 Feb 12
4
Performance VPN over the internet
Hi 'tinc users' I'm new whit tinc and this mail-list. I like to build a vpn over the internet between two sites in Holland and Germany. Are there some experience whit the performance (turn-a-round en bandwidth) of a link. I want to use it for a 1,5Mb connection. Greetings, Fred Krom. - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive:
2001 Nov 04
8
Connection problem
I've got a test lab set up and im having problems connecting. The first problem is that it takes it a couple of tries before it actually connects the two machines. It complains about bogus data and after trying for a minute or so it connects. kill -USR1 shows that they are connected kill -USR2 only shows the local subnet, not the remote I've tried these versions without any luck: cvs
2001 May 25
4
tinc 1.0pre4 released
...ell be the last prerelease. The only things that have to be tested are the TCPonly and IndirectData options and the FreeBSD and Solaris ports (any help will be greatly appreciated). Thanks, the Tinc Development Team. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20010525/57167977/attachment.pgp
2001 Dec 10
4
tinc dies after some days/weekes of normal activity
Hello, I successfully use tinc for one year in a configuration with several subnets (about 5-7 subnets) and one main server. Sometimes tinc dies with the error message: Error while waiting for input: Bad file descriptor If it happens, this happens immediately, when one subnet has disconnected. tinc (on the main server) tries then to disconnect all currently connected subnets and while
2002 Apr 09
1
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre7 released
...de, since it sometimes thinks perfectly good RSA keys are bad. * Fix handling of subnets when prefixlength isn't divisible by 8. This version features only small bugfixes. It is fully compatible with 1.0pre6. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20020409/27983025/attachment-0001.pgp
2002 Apr 09
1
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre7 released
...de, since it sometimes thinks perfectly good RSA keys are bad. * Fix handling of subnets when prefixlength isn't divisible by 8. This version features only small bugfixes. It is fully compatible with 1.0pre6. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20020409/27983025/attachment-0001.pgp
2001 Jan 10
2
1.0pre3 difficulties
Was running 1.0pre2 just fine, but had to move machines, so I figgured I'd give 1.0pre3 a try. After getting everything to build and figguring out the new config files, here's where I'm stuck. Start the server process (remote machine). Start the client process (local machine). In remote machine, the following shows up in syslog: tinc[2659]: Got SEGV signal In local machine, the
2000 Aug 21
2
tinc TODO list
Hi, here's a small list of things that need to be done, and the version when it should be ready. smartcard support 1.1 LDAP support 1.1 public/private keys for authentication 1.1 don't store passphrases in files that are called after IP addresses 1.0 use names to identify
2001 Jun 01
2
Error: cannot route packet - please help
Hi, I?m fighting with a silly problem: my syslog tells me tinc cannot route a packet. I can use a telnet or the good ol ping, it is the same effect. When I?m pinging from the laptop (172.16.11.2) the network address (172.16.11.0) or any address numerically lower than the laptops address, the packet gets routed, otherwise not. And when I ping the network address, I get the reply twice, as to be
2001 May 08
4
tap1 problem
Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, Having set up the kernel correctly, and got tinc running successfully, I am now trying to get two VPNs running at once. Hence I need to have two ethertap devices ( /dev/tap0 and /dev/tap1 ). The first tap0 device was created thus: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap0 c 36 16 chown 0.0 /dev/tap0 The second tap1 device was created too: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap1 c 36 17 chown 0.0 /dev/tap1
2000 Jun 11
3
TINC 1.0pre2 problem
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, David Summers wrote: > Thanks for the great software package! The question I have is this: Thank you :) > My goal is to set up a triangle topology VPN between three sites and run > OSPF routing on all the sites so that if a link goes down between any two > sites the OSPF routing will reroute the packets that used to go between > the sites A <-> B to A
2000 Jul 06
1
Notification: PR#9
JitterBug notification ivo moved PR#9 from incoming to wishlist Message summary for PR#9 From: vdongen@hetisw.nl Subject: map Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 18:23:20 0200 (CEST) 0 replies 0 followups Notes: This is a nice idea on itself, but not really doable in tinc itself. What would be nice is the ability to control tinc realtime with some sort of GUI tool. This tool can then be used for much
2000 Aug 18
0
No DESTDIR in po makefiles
...l root - not very nice. I don't know how to edit the Makefile.in.in files, I can find out but it'd be nicer if somebody else with experience with gettext could do it :). ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/ ------------------------------------------- --- TINC development list, tinc-devel@nl.linux.org Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc-devel/
2000 Nov 12
1
Balanced trees in tinc
...wn library that supports balanced trees, please tell me. In the mean time I will be trying to create some support routines for red-black or AVL trees combined with a linked list. ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/ ------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature...
2001 Feb 27
1
[CVS] humbolt:/tinc/src net.c
Guus Sliepen wrote: > - Added TCP_NODELAY and IPTOS_LOWDELAY options for meta sockets. Maybe it's better to make these optional? -- Ivo Timmermans --- TINC development list, tinc-devel@nl.linux.org Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc-devel/
2001 May 10
0
[mh@designassembly.de: [Vtun] Windows port]
...so did anybody have any success yet, or maybe some sources I could use as a starting point, so I don't have to start from scratch? Michael ----- End forwarded message ----- ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/ ------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature...