search for: wallez

...not a class, which means I can only change it and not extend it to override what needs to be. What''s the rationale for Sortable not being a class? Is making it a class something that can be envisioned? If yes, I''d happily provide a patch for this. Thanks, Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director

...workaround is for sure to use "for (var i = 0; i < array_variable.length; i++)" but that doesn''t look satisfying as it requires to update the 3rd party code. I assume I''m not the first one to have this problem, so how do you guys handle this? Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director

Hi all, when I want to interate through an array, all those pesky Prototype functions get in my way! When I do this: --------------------- r=""; for(x in new Array()) { r+="var: "+x+", val: "+ (new Array())[x]+"\n"; } alert(r); --------------------- I get a giant alert window with loads of functions printed out. Is this a bug, or is there a better way to

Hi, I''m using prototype within ruby on rails. One limitation I''d like to overcome is the restriction of beeing able to update just one html elements content using from_remote_tag or link_to_remote. AFAICS this is just a restriction of the form_remote_tag/link_to_remote implementation and it''s underlying Ajax.Updater class. Right? In theorie there should be no problem,