search for: wailing

Hello everyone, Since the upgrade to 1.0.alpha3 I experience a strange problem with plaintext authentication. I successfully login first few (2-5) times after the dovecot restart, and then on a reason I cannot login any more (both via POP3 and IMAP). I tried to find out what could be the reason for this but I failed. Nothing is changed inside the user's home directory or

I'm currently going through the LLVM OCaml bindings tutorial in preparation for using LLVM in my own project. While the tutorial is very helpful, it was somewhat hard to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex and ocamlyacc (the only

2009/4/13 Chris Wailes <chris.wailes at gmail.com>: > I'm currently going through the LLVM OCaml bindings tutorial in preparation > for using LLVM in my own project.  While the tutorial is very helpful, it > was somewhat hard to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and > ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. > > I have managed

I tried searching the list archives, but "NT server" gives me 14530 matches, go figure. :-) And I've read through all the docs that ship with Samba, and the FAQ, and the webpages. No joy. We're using Samba 2.0.5a under Solaris 7. Everything works *wonderfully* when mounting a Unix-side filesystem as an NT/98 share. The username maps save our butts, the security is

...41705) 'Indicates the ACL structure is is not valid'. Followed, of course, by the unwinding call stack. 4) smbclient //localhost/netlogon -UAdministrator -c 'ls' nets me the message: 'Domain=[ozco] os=[unix] Server=[Samba 4.3.1] NT_STATUS_INVALID_ACL listing \*' After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. Now, 'samba-tool gpo aclcheck' returns "uncaught exception - (-1073741790 'access denied')". I really would appreciate any help you can offer! -jimc

> > I'm happy to apply any patches :) Even better if you wanted to extend > the tutorial to support things like garbage collection. As I go along in my project and explore these features I might be willing to produce code for additional chapters but I don't think I have time to dedicate to it now. What was the problem? I just tested it out on fedora 10 and it worked > after

I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or...

On Tuesday 14 April 2009 01:29:44 Chris Wailes wrote: > I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex > and ocamlyacc (the only thing I'm missing is the ability to assign > precendence to user defined binary and unary operators), and was wondering > if ther would be an interest in adding my code as supplimental material. Yes! I thought it was a bit of

...phy wrote: > >> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. > > Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement > could be named MUD. > > Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) > > > > There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when these changes rolled into Fedora. After a while, I got used to it and now it seems normal. Plus, if you type "yum update" it responds "what your really should type is dnf update, but I'll do it for you anyway". -- -- Steve

I've read through the archives and it looks like people are using ext3 with software RAID with at least some success. I just want to confirm that it works properly. If I convert my md RAID 0 to ext3, should I expect A) A fast journalled filesystem, or B) Wailing and gnashing of teeth My RAID currently does not use persistant superblocks, because I created it many moons ago under the old raidtools. Should I convert it to the new style before making it ext3, or is is not relevant? Regards, Jeffrey Baker

...yum had associations which it was sad to lose. >>> >>> Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement >>> could be named MUD. >>> >>> Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) >> >> There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when these changes rolled >> into Fedora. After a while, I got used to it and now it seems normal. >> Plus, if you type "yum update" it responds "what your really should >> type is dnf update, but I'll do it for you anyway". > &...

Attached are alternative the files for chapters 1-7 that use ocamlyacc and ocamllex. I have cleaned them up and debugged them as best I can but I may have missed something, so any comments on them would be great. Also, the LLVM-OCaml bindings are messed up in Fedora 10 (some of the binary files point to their origonal build directory) so I had to put in a dirty hack in the Makefile. I left in

On 22/11/15 10:04, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, jimc! > >> After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. > Unfortunately, Samba does not use POSIX ACL's, if its own ACL's are present on > files. (If at all.) > Unless you have it configured for POSIX ACL's, but that's not the case for DC. Samba doesn't use ACLs at all, it is just a b...

Dear Admin, It seems that mails from our iit.ac.in domain are being marked as spam. It would be nice if something could be done about this. Best Regards Ramakrishna On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Aditya Kamath < adityakamath+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > (I received many emails that my posts were marked spam, so I am re-sending > this from another email address

...gt;>> Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") >>>>> replacement >>>>> could be named MUD. >>>>> >>>>> Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) >>>> >>>> There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when these changes >>>> rolled into Fedora. After a while, I got used to it and now it seems >>>> normal. Plus, if you type "yum update" it responds "what your really >>>> should type is dnf update, but I'll do it for you...

Dear list, I'm trying to learn how to use nlme to be able to fit ad analyse mixed-model logistic regressions. In order to keep things simple, I started by the simplest possible model : a one (fixed-effect ...) continuous variable. This problem is, of course, solved by glm, but I wanted to look at a "hand-made" nls fit, in order to be able to "generalize" to nlme

Kenneth Porter wrote: > I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on > CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with > dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a For the normal user (like me) dnf is neither better nor worse than yum. In fact it is almost identical. In my view, the introduction of a new

...ciations which it was sad to lose. > > > > Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement > > could be named MUD. > > > > Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) > > > > > > > > > There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when these changes rolled > into Fedora. After a while, I got used to it and now it seems normal. > Plus, if you type "yum update" it responds "what your really should type > is dnf update, but I'll do it for you anyway". > There was a mai...

.... >>>> >>>> Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") >>>> replacement >>>> could be named MUD. >>>> >>>> Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) >>> >>> There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when these changes >>> rolled into Fedora. After a while, I got used to it and now it seems >>> normal. Plus, if you type "yum update" it responds "what your really >>> should type is dnf update, but I'll do it for you anyway&quot...

...41705) 'Indicates the ACL structure is is not valid'. Followed, of course, by the unwinding call stack. 4) smbclient //localhost/netlogon -UAdministrator -c 'ls' nets me the message: 'Domain=[ozco] os=[unix] Server=[Samba 4.3.1] NT_STATUS_INVALID_ACL listing \*' After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. Now, 'samba-tool gpo aclcheck' returns "uncaught exception - (-1073741790 'access denied')". 1) Did you run a disk check (fsck) on your DC after the outage? 2) Did you try to reset ACL's on your Sysvol? Viktor