search for: waaaaay

...09, 2024 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Jan Schermer wrote: > The correct solution is to throw whatever requires it to the garbage and never buy from that vendor again. As nice as this sounds, the selection of possible algorithms on the (usually "internal network only") management interface is waaaaay low on the priority list when shopping for a $50k router... gert -- "If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."...

I was about to patch oggenc to replace '/' in the strings included in the -n format [*], but that's too platform specific. Thinking waaaaay back, I realise that it's not even Windows versus the rest of the world. How should this be handled? The Windows criteria are probably generally useful, they include nuisance characters for shells, but I wouldn't like to lose colon unnecessarily (pun suppressed). It does make me wonder,...

As great as Rails 2.1 is, I for the life of me cannot figure out why polymorphic associations do not support reconfiguring the type column used. For example, I have no way to do a polymorphic association using a lookup hash which maps an integer to a class name. Storing a TINYINT unsigned is waaaaay more efficient than storing a string like "SomeActiveRecordModel" over and over again. Looking in the association proxy classes for has_one and has_many, I see: def construct_sql case when @reflection.options[:as] @finder_sql = "#{@reflec...

...ig/environment.rb:54 from /Users/maxbenjamin/Desktop/telewriting/public/dispatch.fcgi:21 ################################################################## pointing my browser at http://localhost:3000/ I get a 500 error. Any help would be very appreciated. I''ve been at this for waaaaay to long. Thanks, Max -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...+0200, Jan Schermer wrote: > > The correct solution is to throw whatever requires it to the garbage and > never buy from that vendor again. > > As nice as this sounds, the selection of possible algorithms on the > (usually "internal network only") management interface is waaaaay low > on the priority list when shopping for a $50k router... > > gert > -- > "If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you > feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never > doubted > it myself till I met a computer wi...

...parent 10:11 sfq quantum 1514b perturb 15 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip \ dst xxx.xxx.225.20 flowid 10:11 Now, this doesn''t work. The customer is NOT limited to 512k. Tested. Downloading from ftp (not on our network) was as fast as 143KB (which is waaaaay more than 512kbit, even more than double that). Now, is it impossible to do limiting that way? I don''t know. Another possibility is the limiter sending ICMP redirects, I haven''t tried disabling them yet. 225.1 is linux 2.2, 225.10 is linux 2.4 and 225.20 is some 3com ADSL stuff....

Luben, We all have different types of learning and how we approach this, let alone how we decompose things. With that, sorry you found this frustrating. Many of us put volunteer time into this trying to make things 'possible' and preferably 'easy' but we don't always get there. That said, I have shown multiple times over the last few years that the simple _one statement

The crypto policies are system-wide to disallow any software (using system crypto) from using unsafe/weak/unwanted algorithm, which is exactly what you are trying to do. You?ll need to allow that system-wide by default, unfortunately. Luckily you can then disallow ssh-rsa in ssh-config by default and only enable it for a few hosts. The correct solution is to throw whatever requires it to the

...everything else, but I can't find anyone else in this same situation. So, can anyone please suggest ways to make this work. I don't care how it's done, but the requirements are: * Anonymous CIFS shares * Works by name across subnets * Without a WINS server on each subnet (we have waaaaay too many subnets, some in weird places) * (Preferably) Without WINS altogether Let me know if you need any specific information as far as config files, versions, or diagrams. Thanks in advance! Jon Heese Systems Administrator Weld County Computer Services ACS Government Systems, Inc., A Xerox C...

Hello folks, I have a really strange routing problem that no amount of googling and experimenting has been able to solve. Then again, I''m new to Xen and "advanced" networking, so I could be missing something very basic. Summary: an unprivileged domU with PCI frontend for a NIC is used as a router; icmp gets routed, but tcp/ip only partially. I''m using a xen-unstable

Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev

We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so we're contemplating switching to ZFS. As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux http://zfsonlinux.org/ calls itself production ready despite a version number of 0.6.2, and

Reviews Wanted. I''ve read the tables of contents and haven''t yet made up my mind. Is one book clearly better than the other? Is one clearly full of bugs? Is one so much further ahead that there is no choice? Are they both so incomplete that I should just wait and only cook real food? Do trains still have dining cars? Warren Fred -------------- next part -------------- An