Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vtkellers".
Did you mean:
tellers
2020 Nov 04
2
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...something like delay=NA to socketConnection() in order to not touch (NA), enable (TRUE) or disable (FALSE) TCP_NODELAY. I wonder if there is any other way we could infer the intention of the user to try to choose the right approach...
Cheers,
Simon
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 02:28, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote:
>
> Could TCP_NODELAY and TCP_QUICKACK be exposed to the R user so that they might determine what is best for their potentially latency- or throughput-sensitive application?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproje...
2020 Nov 02
3
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...Connect():
>
> Unit: microseconds
> expr min lq mean median uq max neval
> clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298 5322.234 1000
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> > On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is...
2020 Nov 04
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...socketConnection() in order to not touch (NA), enable (TRUE) or disable (FALSE) TCP_NODELAY. I wonder if there is any other way we could infer the intention of the user to try to choose the right approach...
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 2020, at 02:28, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote:
> >
> > Could TCP_NODELAY and TCP_QUICKACK be exposed to the R user so that they might determine what is best for their potentially latency- or throughput-sensitive application?
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:05, I?a...
2020 Nov 01
2
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed
that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is
significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar
hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is there a way to
avoid the apparent additional Linux overhead?
I attempted to isolate the behavior with a test that simply returns
2020 Nov 02
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...ine + R but with TCP_NODELAY enabled in R_SockConnect():
Unit: microseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298 5322.234 1000
Cheers,
Simon
> On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote:
>
> I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is there a...
2020 Nov 02
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...expr min lq mean median uq
>> max neval
>> clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298
>> 5322.234 1000
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> > On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and
>> noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R
>> session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS
>> with similar hardware. Is t...