search for: vtkeller

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vtkeller".

Did you mean: vtkellers
2020 Nov 04
2
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...something like delay=NA to socketConnection() in order to not touch (NA), enable (TRUE) or disable (FALSE) TCP_NODELAY. I wonder if there is any other way we could infer the intention of the user to try to choose the right approach... Cheers, Simon > On Nov 3, 2020, at 02:28, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: > > Could TCP_NODELAY and TCP_QUICKACK be exposed to the R user so that they might determine what is best for their potentially latency- or throughput-sensitive application? > > Best, > Jeff > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproj...
2020 Nov 02
3
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...Connect(): > > Unit: microseconds > expr min lq mean median uq max neval > clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298 5322.234 1000 > > Cheers, > Simon > > > > On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: > > > > I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and i...
2020 Nov 04
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...socketConnection() in order to not touch (NA), enable (TRUE) or disable (FALSE) TCP_NODELAY. I wonder if there is any other way we could infer the intention of the user to try to choose the right approach... > > Cheers, > Simon > > > > On Nov 3, 2020, at 02:28, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: > > > > Could TCP_NODELAY and TCP_QUICKACK be exposed to the R user so that they might determine what is best for their potentially latency- or throughput-sensitive application? > > > > Best, > > Jeff > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:05, I?...
2020 Nov 01
2
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is there a way to avoid the apparent additional Linux overhead? I attempted to isolate the behavior with a test that simply returns
2020 Nov 02
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...ine + R but with TCP_NODELAY enabled in R_SockConnect(): Unit: microseconds expr min lq mean median uq max neval clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298 5322.234 1000 Cheers, Simon > On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: > > I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS with similar hardware. Is there a reason for this difference and is there a...
2020 Nov 02
0
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
...expr min lq mean median uq >> max neval >> clusterEvalQ(cl, iris) 156.125 166.41 180.8806 170.247 174.298 >> 5322.234 1000 >> >> Cheers, >> Simon >> >> >> > On 2/11/2020, at 3:39 AM, Jeff <jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: >> > >> > I'm exploring latency overhead of parallel PSOCK workers and >> noticed that serializing/unserializing data back to the main R >> session is significantly slower on Linux than it is on Windows/MacOS >> with similar hardware. Is...