Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "vr9".
Did you mean:
vr
2011 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] Error in a custom analysis Pass
Hi,
I am writing an analysis pass for a custom processor. I get an unusual
situation where the code generated for a BB is
BB#23: derived from LLVM BB %sw.bb99
Live Ins: %vr2 %vr0 %vr1 %vr9 %vr3 %vr8 %vr4 %vr5 %vr6
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#22
%vr46<def> = LD_Iri %LV, -4; mem:LD4[FixedStack0]
%vr7<def> = ADDri %vr9, 1
%vr47<def> = ADDri %vr46, -4
ST_Iri %LV, -4, %vr47<kill>; mem:ST4[%cpArg.addr]
>>> %vr48...
2005 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM to SUIF-MACH VM binary
...use any of the code generator components). If it does, making
> use of the code generator infrastructure would make sense.
>
> -Chris
>
Sample from SUIF disassembler (done by someone else):
lda $vr10.p32 <- main.A
cvt $vr11.p32 <- $vr10.p32
add $vr12.p32 <- $vr11.p32,$vr9.s32
lod $vr13.s32 <- 0($vr12.p32)
cvt $vr8.s32 <- $vr13.s32
mul $vr6.s32 <- $vr7.s32,$vr8.s32
ldc $vr15.s32 <- 5
ldc $vr18.s32 <- 1
add $vr17.s32 <- main.i,$vr18.s32
********************
So I guess it is RISK. Lots of virtual registers, so I guess allocation isn't a
b...
2005 Jan 18
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM to SUIF-MACH VM binary
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote:
>> Can you say a little bit about MACH-SUIF? With a brief google search, I
>> didn't turn up anything that described the architecture. Is it a RISC-like
>> machine with 32-bit instruction words?
>>
>
> It's another VM representation. I haven't really gotten to know the nitty
> gritty of the language so
2012 Mar 30
1
[LLVMdev] load instruction memory operands value null
Hi,
For a custom target, there is a pass to perform memory dependence analysis, where, i need to get memory pointer for "load instruction". I want to check the pointer alias behavior. I am getting this by considering the memoperands for the load instruction.
For "load instruction", Machine Instruction dumps as below:
vr12<def> = LD_Iri %vr2<kill>, 0;