search for: vpids

Hi, (Assume VPID is available and enabled.) I''m trying to figure the TLB stuff with VPIDs. I understand from the poorly written chapter in the intel manual that if an HVM vcpu is running then only the TLBs tagged with the vcpu.VPID will be used. If xen or a PV guest is running, then VPID 0 TLBs are what will be used. Now I understand the hvm_asid_flush_vcpu upon new guest cr3, will js...

Hello, In processors supporting VPID I think we should invalidate the VPID mapping in the TLB after a shadow invlpg (in case EPT is turned off). Signed-off-by: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com> Gianluca _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Kashyap: I have not tried integrating your guest xml but I will look over it today when I get a chance. Thank you. Martin: Below is the output from /proc/cpuinfo. Let me know if there is anything else that would be helpful in debugging this. Thank you, Michael Giardino processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 60 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz stepping

On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:

Hi all, I am trying to configure a kvm guest using pci passthrough to pass it a wireless pci adapter (host is my personal laptop). But when I try to start it: error: Failed to start domain obsdfw error: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support passthrough of host PCI devices PCI passthrough is enabled: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64

Hi everyone I'm trying to create a virtual machine using OpenNebula [1] on a centos 6.4 server, but i'm facing some erros using kvm / libvirt. This server is running on a virtual machine created on XCP. Then, my infrastructure is: XCP 1.6 (hypervisor - dom0) + CentOS 6.4 (running on a XCP VM) + OpenNebula 4.0.1 (installed on CentOS). In the host machine, I have the same infrastructure.

> -------- Original message -------- > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Can I configure cores instead of CPU's > From: Todd And Margo Chester <toddandmargo at gmail.com> > To: "libvirt-users at redhat.com" <libvirt-users at redhat.com> > CC: > > > Hi All, > > Scientific Linux 6.1 x64 > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6_1.2.x86_64 > > My XP-Pro

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Hi, I'm geting this message from virt-manager. Server: SuperMicro X8SIL with INTEL X3440 Here is my logs /var/log/dmesg: Bootdata ok (command line is ro root=/dev/md2) Linux version 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen (mockbuild at builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:49:53 EDT 2010 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Xen: 0000000000000000 -

Hi, today I tried to configure a guest using Virt-Manager and used the "copy host cpu configuration" option which resultet in a "Sandy Bridge" model. What I noticed is that for example the "aes" extension is not available in the guest even though it is available on the host cpu. This is what the host cpu looks like: model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @

Hi All, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 with QEMU+KVM for Virtualization. I have successfully created a Windows 2003 VM with 4GB of RAM. The host server is an HP ML350 G8 with 24GB RAM and 24 cores. Details of one of the cores is shown below: processor : 23 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @

Hi Martin Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor

Hi, I have hybrid smp running with autoxlate. However, without autoxlate, I am running into issues realted to TLB flush. The guest in this case makes multicalls as part of which cache is flushed (__do_update_va_mapping, etc..). However, the guest is using VPIDs and it is getting complicated. I can just xen not do any TLB management and let the guest just do it after return from the hypercall. That would be simpler than hacking xen further to put in hooks for hybrid. However, before doing that, I am wondering if there is even a usecase for hybrid without H...

Hi, I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error message from virt-manager is Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features: rtm,

From: Zhang Xiantao <xiantao.zhang@intel.com> With virtual EPT support, L1 hyerpvisor can use EPT hardware for L2 guest''s memory virtualization. In this way, L2 guest''s performance can be improved sharply. According to our testing, some benchmarks can show > 5x performance gain. Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <xiantao.zhang@intel.com> Zhang Xiantao (11):

Hi All, I'm trying to install a VM on host OS (Redhat 6.1, KVM hypervisor). I've installed all the required RPMs for KVM and libvirt tools. Here is the list of libvirt RPMs and KVM modules *kvm.ko kvm-intel.ko libvirt-0.8.7-18.el6.x86_64.rpm libvirt-java-devel-0.4.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm virt-top-1.0.4-3.8.el6.x86_64.rpm libvirt-client-0.8.7-18.el6.x86_64.rpm

I''ve got a new system with Dual Quad Core Intel E5520 processors and Intel 82576 NICs built on the motherboard (this is a Supermicro Nehalem based blade). I''m running Xen 3.4.2, but I''ve also tried 3.4.1 and had the same problem. Dom0''s network works flawlessly, but the DomU systems all have network issues. Whenever they transmit large packets, it is as if

The code was passing sizeof(char *) - not the length of the buffer - to memset. Change the function to take the length of the buffer as a parameter. Fixes the warning: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to provide an explicit length? Signed-off-by: Jonathan Boeing <jonathan.n.boeing at gmail.com> ---

On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >>> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >>> >>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >>> >>> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >>> >>>

These patches fix a few compiler warnings. Tested on top of commit aee0dc5565711ef5be7c30fb5fc1c5f3f98db09f Jonathan Boeing (6): Use z width specifier when printing size_t variable pxe: fix truncation warning gpllib: fix sizeof(char *) misuse hdt: fix sizeof(char *) misuse hdt: fix sizeof(char *) misuse hdt: fix sizeof(char *) misuse com32/gpllib/dmi/dmi.c | 24 +++---