search for: volent

...esult night tester run at FreeBSD 5.1 accessable by URL > http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html > I can't guaranty run it per day base, sorry. Okay, sounds great. I added it to the page with a note to that effect: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Thanks a lot for volenteering to run it. Also, if you notice any big regressions or anything that don't show up on the, say, Linux/X86 tester, please let us know. > As i can see, make (bug 385) and perl (bug 386) not builded by > NightlyTest.pl (but builded if use gmake night tests run format) So I > don...

Result night tester run at FreeBSD 5.1 accessable by URL http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html I can't guaranty run it per day base, sorry. As i can see, make (bug 385) and perl (bug 386) not builded by NightlyTest.pl (but builded if use gmake night tests run format) So I don't known preferable solutions: its can be closed or patches applied. Vladimir

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Valery Khamenya wrote: > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will finish a project that they start, we can't make 'promises' about new features. However, any specific person, at any specific time, should be able to tell you what they are working on. Personally, I'm working on build...

...to make it work. > > > I fixed this by adding a ``return 0;`` at the end of the method. But why > > don't you just provide binaries for windows? I could send you the > > binaries that I built - I have not yet tested them though. > > The LLVM community consists of volenteers, and noone volenteered for 2.0 > :) > > -Chris I volunteer. As soon as I get everything to work. Next problem: I now have the hello.bc file compiled. But how do I get an executable from this? I tried: C:\Eigenes\compiler\llvm-2.0\win32\release>llvm-ld -o=hellow.exe hellow.bc...

Hi! I want to use LLVM for my own "pet" programming language compiler as a backend. Currently it generates C code, but I am not satisfied with this approach as generating high-level C (with proper type declarations!) is horrible. So here are my questions/problems with LLVM: 1.) Are there operations that add, sub, mul integers with overflow checking? How much work would it be to add

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner <sabre <at> nondot.org> writes: > We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very > difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by > volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will > finish a project that they start, we can't make 'promises' about new > features. well, even LLVM 1.2 was too serious to skip some roadmap, at least as for new comers like me. The LLVM 1.9 is much too much serious...

Dear All, Do people think that they are ready to create the LLVM 1.6 release branch? I believe all the development is pretty much done. Is all the documentation in the LLVM source tree updated and ready? I'm not able to make a full doc review like I've been able to do in previous releases, so I need volunteers to work on the docs if they're not done yet. -- John T. -- John

...1. CVS works and is well understood by all involved. 2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't hampered by lack of atomic commits, renames, and better branch facilities). 3. The CVS server is hosted at Illinois. You will have to get buy in from them and a volenteer with access to the machine to do the upgrade work (including converting the post-commit hooks, etc). 4. I maintain that a real distributed VCS would be very useful for LLVM, perhaps moreso than the other features provided by new VCS's. Last time this came up, the available distr...

Perhaps someone could come up with a list of different versioning software, list the pros and cons, and then we could vote? (Has anyone mentioned Bitkeeper yet? :-) -bw On 11/28/06, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if I just took HEAD or converted the whole llvm repo. > > Personally, I like darcs for the atomic theory of patches.

> I'm not sure if I just took HEAD or converted the whole llvm repo. > Personally, I like darcs for the atomic theory of patches. YMMV. I have used darcs to work with psi. It looks like a very clean design, but currently it is a very anemic implementation IMHO. I constantly find myself trying to find out how to do a relatively simple task. Git is fast and has a lot of features, but

Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 10:48 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On May 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > > > Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel: > >> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > >> > >>> 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM > >>> and gcc