search for: visualeffects

I was going to change the background of a div from white to red and then from red back to white, so this is used in an RJS file: page[:vote_score].visual_effect :highlight, :startcolor => ''#ffffff'', :endcolor => ''#ffcccc'' page[:vote_score].visual_effect :highlight, :startcolor => ''#ffcccc'', :endcolor =>

I''m having some issues trying to pass some options into render :update in my controller: render :update do |page| page[''mybox''].visual_effect( :scale, 200, {:scaleContent => false}) end this should just scale the box, and not the content, however, the content scales. I noticed that the following is produced:

Hi All, The subject pretty well describes what I am experiencing. This line in an .rhtml template: <%= link_to_remote menu_item.humanize, {:update => ''section'', :url =>{:controller => menu_item}, :complete => update_page do |page| page.activate_tab("#{menu_item}_tab", ''menu_'') page[''section''].hide

Hi - another question, sorry.... I''m trying to get the highlighting effect to work on the current_item. The page refreshes fine, and then I get an error as the highlighting code is fired: page[:current_item].visual_effect :highlight, :startcolor => "#88ff88", :endcolor => "#114411" The error

Hello, I tried link_to_remote to see the build in AJAX capabilities with rails for the first time for me, I tried the following code and it worked: <%= link_to_remote( "some link", :update => "some_div", :url =>{ :action => :someaction }) %> OK, it has worked, but I have two questions here: 1- When moving

Hello there. I have a problem doing Selenium tests. When I try to test my delete method doesn''t prompt me the respective alert which otherwise would appears before run the destroy method on the controller. Without Selenium the application prompt me as the regular way but within Selenium things go badly. Here is a part of my view: <%=link_to_remote

V1.6.1 (2006-04-06): Sortable Trees, Prototype 1.5.0_rc0 (fixes IE mem leaks)! New features in V1.6.1 and V1.6.0: * Update to Prototype 1.5.0_rc0 * Sortable trees [thx Sammi Williams, sammi-EeRYXuc1dym5PgFUrJwY1aU/zSkkHjvu@public.gmane.org] See the functional test (test/functional/sortable_tree_test.html) and the CHANGELOG for more information! * Add Draggable object as third parameter

Heya, The script.aculo.us SVN repositiory now holds the 1.6 beta. This version is mostly a refactoring/bugfix release, and marks the switch over to Prototype 1.5 (Prototype 1.4.0 is no longer supported). The required prototype.js file is included (lib/prototype.js) of course. Changes since 1.5.3: * Prepare for script.aculo.us 1.6, add Prototype 1.5 requirement and check that

Hello - I''m grappling with some tricky URL rewriting with Apache 2 and mod_rewrite, and could use a hand. Briefly: URL for application is: www.servername.com/path/to/app/ There is no Alias directive; the application is in the directory /www/content/path/to/app/ on the server file system. The FastCGI dispatcher (dispatch.fcgi) lives at: /www/fcgi-bin/path/to/app/dispatch.fcgi Inside

Why is RJS so dependant on programatic creation of Javascript? RHTML is a great implementation in that it puts HTML first, and Ruby second. I would have thought RJS would be the same way: a .js with ERb helpers for generating Javascript functions. RJS putting Javascript second means: - I have to learn a whole new set of commands to use Scriptaculous. - Developers have to constantly chase the

Note that this does not fix gettext for app, that will be done separately in another patch as F10/F11 require different setups for that. In the meantime gettext works if manually changed in environment.rb to gettext_rails instead of gettext/rails Signed-off-by: Jason Guiditta <jason.guiditt at gmail.com> --- src/app/controllers/application.rb | 200 --------

Note that one of the 8 patches (#6) will be sent separately in reply to this email, as some of the replaced lines are too long, so git won't let me send the email. However, there is nothing wrong with that patch, and it should be applied in the sequence listed below. Note also that I assume this will be tested on a clean f11 install, rather than an upgrade of an existing ovirt server