search for: virtio_uev

...dev); + + drv->remove(dev); + + /* Driver should have reset device. */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->config->get_status(dev)); +} + static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, @@ -276,6 +289,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, }; bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id) -- 1.9.3

...dev); + + drv->remove(dev); + + /* Driver should have reset device. */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->config->get_status(dev)); +} + static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, @@ -276,6 +289,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, }; bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id) -- 1.9.3

...ng down, no need for full cleanup. > + */ > + dev->config->reset(dev); > + > +} > + > static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > .name = "virtio", > .match = virtio_dev_match, > @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > .uevent = virtio_uevent, > .probe = virtio_dev_probe, > .remove = virtio_dev_remove, > + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, > }; > > bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...ng down, no need for full cleanup. > + */ > + dev->config->reset(dev); > + > +} > + > static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > .name = "virtio", > .match = virtio_dev_match, > @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > .uevent = virtio_uevent, > .probe = virtio_dev_probe, > .remove = virtio_dev_remove, > + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, > }; > > bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...vice *dev, const struct virtio_device_id *id) @@ -165,7 +176,7 @@ static int virtio_dev_remove(struct device *_d) static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, - .dev_attrs = virtio_dev_attrs, + .dev_groups = virtio_dev_groups, .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, -- 1.8.4.6.g82e253f.dirty

...p sending interrupts, DMA, etc. + * We are shutting down, no need for full cleanup. + */ + dev->config->reset(dev); + +} + static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, }; bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...vice *dev, const struct virtio_device_id *id) @@ -165,7 +176,7 @@ static int virtio_dev_remove(struct device *_d) static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, - .dev_attrs = virtio_dev_attrs, + .dev_groups = virtio_dev_groups, .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, -- 1.8.4.6.g82e253f.dirty

...p sending interrupts, DMA, etc. + * We are shutting down, no need for full cleanup. + */ + dev->config->reset(dev); + +} + static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, }; bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...> > + dev->config->reset(dev); > > + > > +} > > + > > static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > > .name = "virtio", > > .match = virtio_dev_match, > > @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > > .uevent = virtio_uevent, > > .probe = virtio_dev_probe, > > .remove = virtio_dev_remove, > > + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, > > }; > > > > bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...> > + dev->config->reset(dev); > > + > > +} > > + > > static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > > .name = "virtio", > > .match = virtio_dev_match, > > @@ -276,6 +288,7 @@ static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { > > .uevent = virtio_uevent, > > .probe = virtio_dev_probe, > > .remove = virtio_dev_remove, > > + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown, > > }; > > > > bool virtio_device_is_legacy_only(struct virtio_device_id id)

...vice *dev, const struct virtio_device_id *id) @@ -165,7 +176,7 @@ static int virtio_dev_remove(struct device *_d) static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, - .dev_attrs = virtio_dev_attrs, + .dev_groups = virtio_dev_groups, .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, -- 1.8.4.3.gca3854a

...vice *dev, const struct virtio_device_id *id) @@ -165,7 +176,7 @@ static int virtio_dev_remove(struct device *_d) static struct bus_type virtio_bus = { .name = "virtio", .match = virtio_dev_match, - .dev_attrs = virtio_dev_attrs, + .dev_groups = virtio_dev_groups, .uevent = virtio_uevent, .probe = virtio_dev_probe, .remove = virtio_dev_remove, -- 1.8.4.3.gca3854a

to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index e3ecc94..7681fe3 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c @@ -98,11 +98,7 @@

to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index e3ecc94..7681fe3 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c @@ -98,11 +98,7 @@

This is a subject that came up in the virtio BOF session at OLS. I decided to go forward and implement something that I like, based on the latest virtio proposal at the time, which was draft III. It's not a drop-in replacement, because it's missing a host implementation. I first started my own, which is not done yet, but wanted to do one for lguest and one for emulated PCI next. It's

This is a subject that came up in the virtio BOF session at OLS. I decided to go forward and implement something that I like, based on the latest virtio proposal at the time, which was draft III. It's not a drop-in replacement, because it's missing a host implementation. I first started my own, which is not done yet, but wanted to do one for lguest and one for emulated PCI next. It's

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c