search for: viriketo

Hi! (I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian''s patches). When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian''s patches applied, only the first ''hop'' of the routing table "222" is used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt). I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer. Maybe someone can tell me the

Hi! I get this strange behaviour... I don''t know how some packets get into wrong rules. My rules are those: 0: from all lookup local 50: from all lookup main 201: from 192.168.17.0/28 lookup 201 202: from 192.168.16.0/28 lookup 202 222: from all lookup 222 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default Table main has: 192.168.17.0/28 dev eth2

As I''ve read in http://gnumonks.org/papers/netfilter-lk2000/presentation.html, there''s said about the "nat" netfilter table: "This table is different from the ''filter'' table, in that only the first packet of a new connection will traverse the table. The result of this traversal is then applied to all future packets of the same connection." I

I already understood that a packet enters chains in the ''nat'' table only if it is the _first_ packet of a connection. In that case, we may do SNAT in the POSTROUTING chain of the ''nat'' table. So, the packets arrive to the POSTROUTING chain of the ''mangle'' table with the source IP address changed (if it''s said by the rules of the

Hi! I''m still trying to solve the problem, about which I already posted in these lists... I''ve been trying to understand where packet routing and NAT is being done. The schemes are quite clear, when it''s about the _first_ packet of a NAT connection (when it enters the NAT table). But it isn''t that clear about the packets NAT''ed by the connection

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it: