search for: vfs_find_backend_entri

Hello, I've seen this upgrade error posted before: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/171022.html but either there is a different issue or I'm misreading the post. Basically when I run the classicupgrade (samba3 to 4) on a test machine, I get the following (the full debug output will be at the end of my post): ....... key added: key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows

Hello list, I know this has been discussed before (June 2007 looks to be the most recent time), so apologies for covering (sort of) old ground. The lowdown is that samba uses readdir to get its directory listing and this is returned in whatever order the filesystem sees as appropriate (using ext3, it seems to be related to mtime). I have a device which accesses a share using CIFS and presents

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 12.1 system with Samba 4.11.8 using ZFS and I want to get shadow copies working, however the clients (Windows 10) don't show anything in the 'previous versions' tab. I think it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0),

We have: vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl (Actually, vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl fruit streams_xattr, but I wanted to point out the order of shadow_copy2 and zfsacl). To rule out shadow:format problems, I would create just one snapshot with a simple name and configure shadow:format accordingly. Also, is /public the mountpoint of the ZFS dataset? If not, then you might need

We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hi all, I am using samba 4.10.7 and it seems to have bug for using @group in valid or invalid conf (?). And i can't find fixed patch in later release. I describe this issue detail below: 1. Firstly, there is my samba conf below (Add @d_group in "invalid users"): (smb_share.conf) [f1] path = /home/f1 write list = "admin" "@Administrator_Group"

No one care then i closed it. Thanks. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Jeremy <jeremy55662004 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using samba 4.10.7 and it seems to have bug for using @group in valid > or invalid conf (?). And i can't find fixed patch in later release. I > describe this issue detail below: > > 1. Firstly, there is my samba conf below (Add

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --