search for: vfs_find_backend_entry

...dd_a_service: Creating snum = 16 for sysvol hash_a_service: hashing index 16 for service name sysvol doing parameter path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol doing parameter read only = No pm_process() returned Yes set_conn_connectpath: service (null), connectpath = / Initialising default vfs hooks vfs_find_backend_entry called for posixacl Successfully added vfs backend 'posixacl' vfs_find_backend_entry called for /[Default VFS]/ Successfully added vfs backend '/[Default VFS]/' vfs_find_backend_entry called for dfs_samba4 Successfully added vfs backend 'dfs_samba4' vfs_dfs_samba4: Debug cla...

Hello list, I know this has been discussed before (June 2007 looks to be the most recent time), so apologies for covering (sort of) old ground. The lowdown is that samba uses readdir to get its directory listing and this is returned in whatever order the filesystem sees as appropriate (using ext3, it seems to be related to mtime). I have a device which accesses a share using CIFS and presents

...how anything in the 'previous versions' tab. I think it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/smbd/vfs.c:65(vfs_find_backend_entry) vfs_find_backend_entry called for shadow_copy2 Successfully loaded vfs module [shadow_copy2] with the new modules system ... [2020/10/05 16:50:12.483055, 10, pid=50572, effective(3000037, 20), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/modules/vfs_default.c:1327(vfswrap_fsctl) FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COP...

...nything in the 'previous versions' tab. I think it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: > [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/smbd/vfs.c:65(vfs_find_backend_entry) > vfs_find_backend_entry called for shadow_copy2 > Successfully loaded vfs module [shadow_copy2] with the new modules system > ... > [2020/10/05 16:50:12.483055, 10, pid=50572, effective(3000037, 20), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/modules/vfs_default.c:1327(vfswrap_fsctl) >...

We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module

...log file is megabytes long. My smb.conf is also included at the botton. Is it known issue? Any advice how to overcome that? I can't export my filesysem having sharemodes set to no - it's used heavily on Linux side. Regards, Zdenek smetana [2012/05/10 18:47:16.881075, 10] smbd/vfs.c:53(vfs_find_backend_entry) - module gets loaded vfs_find_backend_entry called for gpfs Successfully loaded vfs module [gpfs] with the new modules system [2012/05/10 18:47:16.881906, 10] modules/gpfs.c:201(smbd_gpfs_lib_init) libgpfs lacks gpfs_lib_init [2012/05/10 18:47:18.671854, 10] modules/vfs_gp...

...r bbb to login //$myip/f1 on Windows and i got the denied permission. But user bbb is not in d_group. There are somethings mess up. 4. I saw the log in samba below: [2020/06/05 16:40:40.672747, 10, pid=2781, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/smbd/vfs.c:65(vfs_find_backend_ vfs_find_backend_entry called for /[Default VFS]/ Successfully loaded vfs module [/[Default VFS]/] with the new modules system [2020/06/05 16:40:40.672789, 10, pid=2781, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/service.c:70(set_conn_connectpath) set_conn_connectpath: service IPC$, connectpath = /tmpfs/tmp [202...

...Windows and i got the denied permission. > But user bbb is not in d_group. There are somethings mess up. > > 4. I saw the log in samba below: > [2020/06/05 16:40:40.672747, 10, pid=2781, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), > class=vfs] ../../source3/smbd/vfs.c:65(vfs_find_backend_ > vfs_find_backend_entry called for /[Default VFS]/ > Successfully loaded vfs module [/[Default VFS]/] with the new modules > system > [2020/06/05 16:40:40.672789, 10, pid=2781, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] > ../../source3/smbd/service.c:70(set_conn_connectpath) > set_conn_connectpath: service IPC$, conn...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --