search for: verifity

Dear R help; I'll preface this by saying that the example I've provided below is pretty long, turgid, and otherwise a deep dive into a series of functions I wrote for a simulation study. It is, however, reproducible and self-contained. I'm trying to do my first simulation study that's quite big, and so I'll say that the output of this simulation as I'd like it to be is

I''ve got a block of code that''s turning out.. well - just plain ugly. So i know I must not be doing it the Ruby way. The main problem I''m having is in dealing with handling errors - and just not finding much Rails documentation that gives a deeper understanding of how to handle errors in Rails (outside of several docs on the catch-all''s) the main method

Hello, I want to use rsync to create backups. I think I need a verification that: 1) data is written to disk. 2) data is read back from disk. 3) verify the checksum of data. Does the automatic file verification in rsync works like this? Technically, I'd like to know how does we make step 2 read data from disk and not from file cache/buffer in OS? Or, do OS/harddrives always perform written

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734 Summary: Misleading error message when host key verification is impossible / SSH_ASKPASS impossible. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hi Michael, +CC llvm-dev My guess is that it would be rather error prone to pinpoint exact places where we start populating new LPPassManager since it’s created lazily via LoopPass::assignPassManager. So we are risking to miss adding verifiers in some of the LPPassManager’s. One similar idea is to introduce LCSSAVerifier function pass and make LCSSA pass to be dependant on it. That will allow

Hi, I tried executing the rpm -V command on the packages of the CentOS 7.2 ISO which I have created, the verification failed for some of them. Here is the log for 'authconfig' : Steps: 1. Execute command : rpm -V authconfig 2. Observe the output Expected Result: If there is no error, nothing should be displayed Actual Result: Verification fails with following error log:

Hi, I see some warnings like the following. Could anybody explains what they mean? Thanks. 19/31274477.pdf 257,169,119 0% 1.26MB/s 0:03:15 (xfr#121, to-chk=848309/1043298)WARNING: 18/32281577.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). WARNING: 19/28879866.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). -- Regards, Peng

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Igor Laevsky <igor at azulsystems.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, > Hi Igor, Hi Michael, > >> >> +CC llvm-dev >> >> My guess is that it would be rather error prone to pinpoint exact places where we start populating new LPPassManager since it’s created lazily via LoopPass::assignPassManager. So we are risking to

hi, my scenario is this: i have a cgi (on host1) that executes ssh (as userxyz) to a remote server (host2), executes a command to retrieve some data and outputs them to the local browser. on host1: #!/usr/bin/perl -w ... $output = `/usr/local/bin/ssh -l userxyz -x host2 ls -l` ... but i get "Host Key Verification failed" on my apache's error_log. i can do it on the command line,

Hello, I have script that I run remotely on a server, using ssh config with a 'command' call in the authorized keys file. I can successfully run this from one of my servers, but when I try from 2 other machines, I receive a Host Key Verification Failed error. When I remove the 'command' from the call from authorized keys on the remote server, I can successfully connect to the

I would like to know if anyone here knows the answer to the following question I need to implement the following conferencing feature for my agents. 1. Agent receives call from caller 2. Agent conferences a verification service 3. After finishing the verification, agent needs to drop third party (Verification service) and continue on the line with caller. My problem

Dear all, I'm happy to share a recent publication on a bounded model checker for concurrent programs represented in LLVM IR that integrates the verification framework that I'm developing: Marcelo Sousa, and Alper Sen, LLVMVF: A Generic Approach for Verification of Multicore Software. Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications, September 2013. (

On 9/26/2017 6:11 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Mikael reported a machine verification failure in his out-of-tree target with the MachineCopyPropagation changes to forward registers (which is currently reverted). The verification in question is:

I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW. Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public one is shared), anytime i connect to the other system, I get the host verification failed error and have to

Hello, all, My name is Scott Santucci and I'm a software developer kicking around various wild ideas. (I wish I had something more interesting to say about myself than that, but nothing comes to mind; my day job is in SQL and Java, nothing to do with LLVM.) I am wondering whether anyone has tried using LLVM to apply formal verification to program code. I'm thinking about trying to

Hi, what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? Are such packets inevitably dropped? Does a network card drop them when it does checksum verification in hardware even before the packets go anywhere? In general, if someone were to send me UPD packets with invalid checksums over the internet, how far would such packets get? In particular, how likely it is that SRTP

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1625 Summary: [PATCH] Make configuration of key verification from DNS easier Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hi all, Mikael reported a machine verification failure in his out-of-tree target with the MachineCopyPropagation changes to forward registers (which is currently reverted). The verification in question is: *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval *** - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref - interval: %vreg77

On 9/26/2017 6:47 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Geoff Berry <gberry at codeaurora.org >> <mailto:gberry at codeaurora.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 9/26/2017 6:11 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: >>>> On Sep 26, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev >>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org

Hi all I have succesfully set up PPTP VPN access to my company using PoPToP/pppd (thank you Tom for excellent documentation), everything works fine so far. Problem is security. As I understand it, since PPTP ports trough tunnel are opened to whole Internet (have to be), access verification is now based only on username/password combination. Can level of security be raised with MAC verification?