search for: vent

I''m having trouble getting the magical counter to work in a rails app with single table inheritance. following is the relevant code. thank you class declarations class Job < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :vents end class Vent < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :job, :counter_cache => true validates_numericality_of :width end class Rectangular < Vent validates_numericality_of :height end table declarations CREATE TABLE `jobs` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `name...

Hi all [Exclamation] I decided to register because i cant solve the problem with a game and speaking program from the topic. When i run those 2 things separately they work very fine. But when i try to run them together World of Warcraft just freezes. Ventrilo still works fine, people can hear me and i can hear them. When i run WoW without Vent, it works really nice. Even voice chat in game works. But my guild uses Vent so i need to have both programs running at the same time. Here`s what i get in a console when i try to run WoW witch Vent already ru...

I built this box and was looking forward to running eve on it. 2 weeks later CCP dropped support for Linux and I haven't been able to get a decent install yet. I found some instructions last night that let me run eve in safe mode, but if I tried adding Vent, it would crash. Also, I can't get Vent to run either. Can somebody post a straight forward install so I can run this game as intended, with Vent support. UBUNTU Hardy 8.04 Kernel Linux 2.6.24-27-generic GNOME 2.22.3 Memory 3.2 GiB Processor 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz...

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software's users to > protest. Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though. -- Jonathan Billings

...>>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org >>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >>> Behalf Of John Hodrien >>> Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 >>> To: CentOS mailing list >>> Cc: Mark LaPierre >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent >>> >>> My opinion is that there's a silent majority who don't hate >>> Gnome3, and that >>> it's not half as terrible as people seem to make out. You can start >>> applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do >>> p...

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Mark LaPierre > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > My opinion is that there's a silent majority who don't hate Gnome3, and that > it's not half as terrible as people seem to make out. You can start > applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do people really > want from a DE? Being able to just type...

...Message----- >>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >>> Behalf Of John Hodrien >>> Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 >>> To: CentOS mailing list >>> Cc: Mark LaPierre >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent >>> >>> My opinion is that there's a silent majority who don't hate Gnome3, >>> and that >>> it's not half as terrible as people seem to make out. You can start >>> applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do people >&gt...

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Billings > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 11:47 AM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software...

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote: > No one is saying that sysvinit is perfect. What I can't grasp is why > replace it with something which is no less imperfect, and is almost > certainly worse in at least some respects - and to make that replacement > unavoidable and mandatory. Distros weighed up the advantages and disadvantages, and made a decision as to what they thought

On 01/23/16 18:20, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > > For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is > no way to ask it to only show monospace fonts. > > It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you > have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't

On Sat, January 23, 2016 5:20 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > > For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is > no way to ask it to only show monospace fonts. > > It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you > have to do something special to get fonts shown

On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:20, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > > For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is no way > to ask it to only show monospace fonts. > > It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you have to > do something special to get fonts shown that

On 01/23/2016 06:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > > For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is > no way to ask it to only show monospace fonts. > > It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you > have to do something special to get fonts shown that

On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 20:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500 > Mark LaPierre wrote: > > > The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because I > > don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3. > > Install Mate on Centos 7 and you never have to touch Gnome 3. I did, > and my desktops don't look or work any

On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 12:01 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Well, there is Linux distribution which is systemd-free. And that > distribution I predict will live for decently long time. It is "Devuan" - > a fork of Debian, stripped off systemd and friends... well, I should have > said: composed without systemd and friends. Devuan was forked off ebian > because of systemd.

> Seriously, who is in charge with the UI design in gnome? > > Whoever it is needs to be fired. > > /rant > Most of them were already fired or left cause of under-funding. Like other OSS projects, they are severely understaffed.

Isn't this basically a volunteer effort? On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Micky <mickylmartin at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seriously, who is in charge with the UI design in gnome? > > > > Whoever it is needs to be fired. > > > > /rant > > > > Most of them were already fired or left cause of under-funding. > Like other OSS projects, they are

On 01/24/2016 10:23 PM, Hal Wigoda wrote: > Isn't this basically a volunteer effort? At one point I believe they were funded by Novel, not sure who is funding the project now.

On 01/25/2016 01:28 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > I personally love Gnome3 on Fedora. It took me about a week to adjust my > mindset though -- I did that over a Xmas break. > > It did help that I read the release notes first (so I was not surprised at > the major change) and went through the tutorial the developers provided. > > An interesting exercise re-examining and

...; Depending on how the systemd drama plays out CentOS-6 may well be our last RH derivative, and perhaps our last Linux. At the moment we are withholding any judgement on the matter for want of clear empirical evidence respecting systemd's benefits and risks. On our test CentOS-7 systems we eventually switched to Mate. That in itself sorted out most of the most visceral negativity to RHEL7. But systemd, rightly or wrongly, remains a controversial issue here. And, being more interested in stability than features we will await further developments on that front. Maybe someone could convinc...