Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "veb".
Did you mean:
ve
2014 Jan 24
0
Libvirt support for VEB
Hello,
I have a setup of virtual machines and wherein my virtual switch (OVS) takes care of switching locally and it uses the network for talking to VM's outside the server (like a VEB scenario I guess). I want Netlink messages to be sent to LLDPAD. I understand that i had to modify the XML files and start the VM. But, i see from the XML that it supports only VEPA, not VEB.
But, irrespective of VEB or VEPA, those VM information should be known to the upstream switch through VDP....
2005 Nov 25
7
tcpdump not working with imq0 devices
On my debian woody (kernel 2.4.31) the tcpdump
doesn''t work with imq0 devices. If I try to tcpdump
imq devices there is no packet seen:
[...]
rt1:~# tcpdump -n -i imq0
Warning: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket
tcpdump: WARNING: imq0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on
2014 Sep 19
1
Syslog PID
Hi!
How to write PIDs to syslog?
Example:
Sep 19 00:57:00 hostname dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=< username at domainname.com >, method=PLAIN, rip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, lip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, mpid=14407, TLS, session=<6LYlcmYDAQC4reGs>
Sep 19 00:57:00 hostname dovecot: pop3( username at domainname.com ): Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0
Sep 19 00:57:09 hostname
2009 Dec 08
3
Guest bridge setup variations
As promised, here is my small writeup on which setups I feel
are important in the long run for server-type guests. This
does not cover -net user, which is really for desktop kinds
of applications where you do not want to connect into the
guest from another IP address.
I can see four separate setups that we may or may not want to
support, the main difference being how the forwarding between
guests
2009 Dec 08
3
Guest bridge setup variations
As promised, here is my small writeup on which setups I feel
are important in the long run for server-type guests. This
does not cover -net user, which is really for desktop kinds
of applications where you do not want to connect into the
guest from another IP address.
I can see four separate setups that we may or may not want to
support, the main difference being how the forwarding between
guests
2009 Aug 07
3
[Bridge] [evb] RE: [PATCH][RFC] net/bridge: add basic VEPA support
Paul,
I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux
Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge)
As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster
2009 Aug 07
3
[Bridge] [evb] RE: [PATCH][RFC] net/bridge: add basic VEPA support
Paul,
I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux
Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge)
As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster
2009 Aug 07
3
[Bridge] [evb] RE: [PATCH][RFC] net/bridge: add basic VEPA support
Paul,
I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux
Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge)
As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster
2005 Dec 21
9
question about changejournal
Hi,
I''ve got a newbie question--sorry if this is covered elsewhere, I parsed
through the archives for awhile and didn''t see it.
I''d like to listen for whenever a file is renamed (e.g. foo.txt -> foo.old)
and then magically change it back. This sounds odd, but I''m working with a
stubborn application and this will actually make things work nice.
So, if I do:
2008 May 21
0
Errors in using gdb (PR#11496)
...Z1egZ6h8fAGwXawc9l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...
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...Nl3T4A*xn at d-5|E7v
z<NW?%N{uf*+8Ci?l|>@Cu}q?pJ8#F%vp#rdj!1g-2=I0)VCo%bQy>v-L#D-HX{V}q
z5 at fsYsPOx_Tb0l@nFJIc)fMra+#qfxAT{St#77i90Zdpjq~t_yJj3TDF-IBG`!PR0
zm;7V9f&nNm3<UDE5--dz7Jf0x@&WR4Jj_7^WI at 7D`25QN96W1WqpgO`Zqk<3V<C*m
z<9?yPO8{bs0tqr<RVDhZ2P_*|KE28=r%m1^({q{vEB)InV=^31T@=xoAEEc|X3DI3
zDpMflXu$L`i;$@9PaNLMwD>FG`$x=pn+!j~)pa?gIvR#nlh$8Oj#shQ#5mxt2Bm6!
zv5EUwbCnFSn4$$}&A4;x0(647C}&hEAFXk5HNb3gvR1P{P4Qz|b_ErclO+I9P8f*%
zdN^ULOhrYbuwr6y=Q;dN*Ka^5l6jNwg$pQ3KUehaZ=Q?pwn$9rE>lDkK*a*+_4RP~
zp|bY-gxo&2GXt4bj{}H60ZRdGOPYOfvv(=xJXbR6uQ<6pE}uPoizG...
2005 Nov 16
0
per packet loadbalancing.
I have the following scheme:
------------- -------------
| router | eth0 ------------------ eth0 | router |
| linux 1 | | linux 2 |
| | eth1 ------------------ eth1 | |
------------- -------------
I''d like to do per packet loadbalancing on linux1
and
2004 Jan 30
1
two interfaces - borrowing bandwidth...
Hello...
I have one 2Mbit WAN interfaces and two vlan LAN interfaces - vlan2 and
vlan3. I''d like to limit bandwidth something like this:
rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan2 and
rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan3
with possibility to borrow bandwidth between vlan2 and vlan3.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it possible to do in any way?
regards,
--
Michal
2002 Nov 28
2
fw and u32 together...
hello...
1.
Is it possible using u32 to filter marked packets? I have found only documents to fw filter to filter marked packets...
2.
If u32 cannot filter marked packets is it possible to use fw and u32 together? I wanted to filter packets marked by iptables by fw, and packets depended on ip destination, src and others by u32, but something goes wrong :(
the filters configuration is:
$TC