search for: vdsl

AHOI! I've big trouble by setting up CentOS 6.3 for my new vDSL. As I've found out, the German Telekom is using VLAN7 for her internet-(data) connections. => http://workaround.org/blog/vdsl O.K. what I've done: The NIC where's my DSL-modem is connectet is eth0. cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 # device for vDSL-modem DEVICE=eth0...

...between two buildings several hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and without having to resort to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 megabit link for about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black Box VDSL Ethernet Extender, which supports 30 megabits over a single twisted pair. This is relevant to the list because I have seen many posts with people facing the same kind of challenge deploying Asterisk in remote locations. In my case, I am running ~40 Snom 360's from the remote building to wh...

I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building is several hundred metres away from my backbone. My only option for cabling to the remote building is copper. My plan is to provision them with a Linux bridge with 4

HI! I'm currently reviewing my (functional) setup with one physical ethernet interface eth1 of the host system being connected to a VDSL modem (not router!). A fully virtualized guest acts as router with this source mode: <source dev='eth1' mode='bridge'/> Reading the docs [1] I'm thinking whether mode='private' would be a better choice because the network packets are supposed to be sent exclusiv...

Hello, CentOS 8 dropped the rp-pppoe package. My attempts with NetworkManager-ppp already failed because it seems that it is not possible to use a VLAN as a device. Please, how does it work under C8 to set up a pppoe connection (German Telekom, VDSL (VLAN 7 required), ZTE modem). Thanks. Joe

I've just got Uverse installed. I had dsl, but ATT insisted I couldn't keep my old dsl, but had to switch to Uverse internet - vdsl. My setup: linux box as router : 10.10.11.252 asterisk box: 10.10.11.180 10.10.11.252 is multihomed and connected to the Uverse Residential Gateway. I've set it up as DMZplus, and it shows the public ip address as eth1. I can ssh into the linux box from outside. sip worked fine w...

...cted 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a normal VDSL connection with a simple customer-router. But it doesn't work for us, which wouldn't be a big problem, but perhaps it is interesting for you. By the way: is there a source where we could get ready-to-user Debian-Packages for Debian stable aka Lenny? Because when using the sid ones we had to...

...RTT: 434.393 msec == Endpoint pjsip_sipgate is now Reachable so it is somewhat clear, why i get a busy, because the endpoint is not reachable. But WHY is the endpoint not reachable? Regarding the architecture: I have two routers cascaded, that is unfortunately necessary. On the first router (vDSL-access router) I have forwarded nearly everything to the second router (Bintec rj 353), where a port forwarding for relevant ports (sip and pjsip (udp and tcp), rtp (udp)) is configured. IF a call goes through, nearly everything is working (audio only incoming, but that is another issue). STUN...

Hi all, First of all, thank you for supporting us. I've installed Libretime (https://github.com/LibreTime/libretime) which user Icecast2 on Ubuntu Server 16.04. I've also developed a mobile application to listen to stream myhost:8000/mount. My problem is when the number of listeners increases up 500 (On live streaming with butt), the application blockes, and I hardly get info from

...> > you can configure icecast to serve thousands of listeners but it's not > going to happen on anything less then an industrial strength internet > connection. > > If you have ADSL you can probably handle 5 listeners maybe 10 on an > average service. > > If you have VDSL increase that to 15 maybe. > > If you have fibre it might do 25. > > It all depends on the service provided by your ISP and the condition of > the cabling between the local switch and your location. > > They control how much data you can send and recieve even on " unlomite...

Hi BKF, you can configure icecast to serve thousands of listeners but it's not going to happen on anything less then an industrial strength internet connection. If you have ADSL you can probably handle 5 listeners maybe 10 on an average service. If you have VDSL increase that to 15 maybe. If you have fibre it might do 25. It all depends on the service provided by your ISP and the condition of the cabling between the local switch and your location. They control how much data you can send and recieve even on " unlomited " Then it depends  on t...

...; hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and > without > having to resort > to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 > megabit link for > about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black > Box VDSL Ethernet > Extender, which supports 30 megabits over a single twisted pair. Be very carefully running copper loops between buildings without proper isolation. Google will probably tell you all about it. James

...; hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and > without > having to resort > to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 > megabit link for > about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black > Box VDSL Ethernet > Extender, which supports 30 megabits over a single twisted pair. Be very carefully running copper loops between buildings without proper isolation. Google will probably tell you all about it. James _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided b...

Hello For customers who need a small IP PBX to handle up to four ISDN lines (in France, so I guess that means EuroISDN) instead of a PC + Asterisk and an ISDN gateway box, has someone already played with the Atcom IP-4B? www.atcom.cn/IP-BRIM.html Any feedback appreciated.

...onfigure icecast to serve thousands of listeners but it's > not going to happen on anything less then an industrial strength > internet connection. > > If you have ADSL you can probably handle 5 listeners maybe 10 on > an average service. > > If you have VDSL increase that to 15 maybe. > > If you have fibre it might do 25. > > It all depends on the service provided by your ISP and the > condition of the cabling between the local switch and your location. > > They control how much data you can send and recieve even on...

>Or, you could use a Corinex Phone Line Bridge which runs 128Mbits up to 2000 >feet. They also have a co-ax version which is 200mbits and goes 4000 feet... >About $300 for both ends. too bad they don't say what the bandwidth is at max distance - anyone know?

We are an asterisk user... small time system 50-100 users or so. But, we have an opportunity to get into a big time telecom activity. It would have 2000 to 30,000 user lines per city, and we would like to have those brought back to a central location for control and because transport can be more economical than remote site rentals, maintenance and personnel. We could take the local lines into

...ax size for IPv6 is 1444. Exceeding these values leads to a "ping: local error: Message too long, mtu=1492" in both cases. My Fritzbox says "Native IPv6", no tunnel, no underlying "IPv4 via DS-Lite". These are the default settings for ISP "Deutsche Telekom", VDSL-50. VINCENZO: Tried as adviced to test with FTP, installed pure-ftpd and opened VPS's ftp port in firewall. Maximum IPv4 speed was much slower (1.5-2 MB/sec) than other tests, maybe temporary issue or virtualization. But again: IPv6 was MUCH slower than IPv4. Am 07.11.18 um 20:57 schrieb...

openssh 7.6p1-lp150.7.4 on OpenSuse Leap 15 (both server and client) Hi all, first post to list, hopefully on-topic. Haven't found anything on the net, tried to ask at first in OpenSuse forums a while ago (https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/533588-rsnapshot-rsync-massive-performance-decrease) and today opened a bug in OpenSuse's Bugzilla

...ing category, just a heap of info (I have the logs set to level 2). Is there anything in particular that I should be looking for in the logs? Regarding the use of a VM to access the host in a remote location... I had considered this and there was little choice. The machine is on the end of a VDSL line and was installed to consolidate a few servers in that location in order to save power. I figured that automatically starting a VM that ran the networking was not much more risk than a physical server that had to start up its networking, and that has (so far) proven to be true with all of...