search for: vdb2

...YNTAX: > * (hd[disk number],[partition number])/path/to/file > * > * E.G.: (hd0,1)/dir/file means /dir/file at partition 1 of the disk 0. > * Disk and Partition numbering starts from 0 and 1 respectivelly. > */ > ... > > > # fdisk -l /dev/vdb | grep -w 83 > /dev/vdb2 2099200 4194303 2095104 1023M 83 Linux > # mount | grep vdb2 > /dev/vdb2 on /data type ext4 ... > # ls -1 /data > initramfs-4.4.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc24.x86_64.img > lost+found > vmlinuz-4.4.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 > > > BOOT: > find_all_partitions: failed to set...

.../multifs.h?h=multifs-for-upstream#n27 * MULTIFS SYNTAX: * (hd[disk number],[partition number])/path/to/file * * E.G.: (hd0,1)/dir/file means /dir/file at partition 1 of the disk 0. * Disk and Partition numbering starts from 0 and 1 respectivelly. */ ... # fdisk -l /dev/vdb | grep -w 83 /dev/vdb2 2099200 4194303 2095104 1023M 83 Linux # mount | grep vdb2 /dev/vdb2 on /data type ext4 ... # ls -1 /data initramfs-4.4.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc24.x86_64.img lost+found vmlinuz-4.4.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 BOOT: find_all_partitions: failed to set EFI disk info efi_multifs_init: failed to find di...

...machine with md raid 1. I tried the following. ... #zerombr #clearpart --none --initlabel part raid.01 --onpart vda1 --noformat part raid.02 --onpart vdb1 --noformat raid /boot --fstype xfs --label boot --level 1 --device md0 --noformat part raid.11 --onpart vda2 --noformat part raid.12 --onpart vdb2 --noformat raid pv.00 --level 1 --device md1 --noformat volgroup v --noformat logvol / --fstype=xfs --name=wurzel --vgname=v --useexisting logvol /home --fstype=ext4 --name=home --vgname=v --noformat ... But I get ... 02:54:21,069 ERR anaconda: storage configuration failed: The following pr...

...eg /dev/vda) to have a LVM partition, which in turn has a logical volume for root? It should be possible create a fresh virtual disk, add it to the VM as /dev/vdb (say), and then inside the CentOS 7 VM, partition the new disk into however many partitions you need (say /dev/vdb1 for /boot, /dev/vdb2 for swap, and /dev/vdb3 for /) and then use dd or use mkfs and rsync, etc. to copy the file systems, go a grub-install on /dev/vdb and then stop the VM and remove the /dev/vda disk from it and restart it. Oh, you might need to make sure the UUID or LABEL used to reference the root file system...

...ts(q, vblk->sg_elems-2); If you apply this patch, what happens? Here it prints: [ 0.616564] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues) [ 0.621244] vda: vda1 vda2 < vda5 > [ 0.632290] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues) [ 0.683526] vdb: vdb1 vdb2 < vdb5 > Cheers, Rusty. diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 0a581400de0f..aa9d4d313587 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -683,6 +683,13 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) /* We can handle...

...-l /dev/vdb Disco /dev/vdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Unidades = cilindros de 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/vdb1 * 1 1174 9430123+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/vdb2 1175 1305 1052257+ fd Linux raid autodetect --------------------------------------------------------------------- The idea of these tests is to set up software RAID1 on a running system, since, as I said in another thread, it seems that Anaconda does not support installatio...

...-l /dev/vdb Disco /dev/vdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Unidades = cilindros de 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/vdb1 * 1 1174 9430123+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/vdb2 1175 1305 1052257+ fd Linux raid autodetect - --------------------------------------------------------------------- The idea of these tests is to set up software RAID1 on a running system, since, as I said in another thread, it seems that Anaconda does not support installat...

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:54 PM Simon Matter via CentOS > <centos at centos.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > What makes you think this has *anything* to do with systemd? Bitching >> > about systemd every time you hit a problem isn't helpful. Don't. >> >> If it's not systemd, who else does it? Can you elaborate, please? >> >

Hi, I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs. Here's an example of the backtrace: https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932 I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem: - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num); + BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num && !vq->indirect); Shall I submit the patch or is a more elaborate fix

Hi, I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs. Here's an example of the backtrace: https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932 I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem: - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num); + BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num && !vq->indirect); Shall I submit the patch or is a more elaborate fix

I have a Centos 7 install using EXT4 on LVM. Its running as a VM inside KVM. Issue I have run into is that fstrim does not work due to the LVM. Without fstrim snapshots have gotten huge. Is there a way convert it from LVM to non-LVM without a complete reinstall?

So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not