search for: sdb2

Hey, I am trying to upgrade my kickstart usb key to 6.0 and I ran into a few issues. I boot with: ? append initrd=initrd.img ks=hd:sdb2:/ks.cfg repo=hd:sdb2:/centos and in the ks.cfg I have: ? harddrive --partition=sdb2 --dir=/centos and on sdb2 I have: ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso It fails from the beginning unless I add /images inside /centos, If I do: ? sdb2:/ce...

...vice offlined - not ready after error recovery: host 0 channel 0 id 1 lun 0 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: SCSI error : <0 0 1 0> return code = 0x10000 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 209404208 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb2, logical block 10110526 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on sdb2 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: scsi0 (1:0): rejecting I/O to offline device Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb2, logical block 10110527 Nov 27 19:12:59 server kernel: lost...

...on md device /dev/md125. Faithfully yours, etc. P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/1] [U_] md126 : active raid1 sdb1[1] 104320 blocks [2/1] [_U] md125 : active raid1 sdb2[1] 312464128 blocks [2/1] [_U] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] 312464128 blocks [2/1] [U_] unused devices: <none> firstly, what the heck are md125 and md126? previously there was only md0 and md1.... ???? secondly, I'm not sure what it's trying to tell me....

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me: # mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 ... unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it. Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a blkdev put after mkfs attemp...

...all servers. On the backup server I have the following running: # guestmount --version guestmount 1.40.2 # guestmount --ro -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk1a -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk2 -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk3 -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk4 -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk5 -a /dev/lvm1-vol/sr8-disk6 -m /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sr8-sdb2 # rsync --archive --delete --partial --progress --recursive --no-links --no-devices --quiet /mnt/sr8-sdb2/ /srv/storage/backups/libvirt-filesystems/sr8-sdb2 This used to go fine for many years (we helped with the development of deduplication ntfs support). Now one of our window...

...seemingly random moment - init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (50632) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (137147) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (172036) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (175720) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (72350) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (174751) EXT3-fs error (device sdb2): ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 19698169 in dir #19696695 Aborting journal on device sdb2. init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (165661) EXT3-fs error (device sdb2): ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 19698131 in dir #19696695 init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (76763) init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (3116) init...

Sjors Gielen wrote: > Then I noticed that the partition /dev/sdb2 was mounted noexec, so I > umounted ~/.wine and /media/sdb2, remounted /dev/sdb2 with exec, and > remounted ~/.wine - and it all worked again. > > This is with Wine 1.1.24. Has this always been behavior, or is it a > regression somewhere? Wine will not work / run programs from moun...

...nce I made sure I retrieved all my data, I followed your suggestion, and it looks like I'm making big progress. The system booted again, though it feels a bit sluggish. Here's the current state of things. [root at alphamule:~] # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md125 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 512960 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk md126 : inactive sda1[0](S) 16777216 blocks super 1.2 md127 : active raid1 sda3[0] 959323136 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [U_] bitmap: 8/8 pages [32KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: <...

...I disks. The first disk has WinXP installed, and the second disk has Redhat 8.0. I copied the images into /boot and modified grub.conf accordingly: title Xen / XenoLinux 2.4.22 root (hd1,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 ser_baud=115200 noht noreboot module /xenolinux.gz root=/dev/sdb2 ro console=tty0 When I reboot the machine and select Xen, I have the following error message: root_device_name=sdb2 kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k block-major-8, errno=2 VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb2" or 08:12 Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel...

I have accidently damaged the first block(s) of a btrfs partition and can''t mount it anymore. I can see that my data is still intact by running a command like: cat /dev/sda5 | hexdump -C | more Do any (experimental) tools exist which would allow me to recover the files? Thank you -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a

System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID configuration. md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home Installed kmod ZFS via yum, reboot, zpool works fine. Backed up the /home data 2x, then stopped the sd[ab]2 partition with: mdadm --stop /dev/md1; mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sd[ab]1; Removed /home in /etc/fstab. Used fdisk to set the partition type to gpt for...

...ot;/boot/domU-linux-2.6.18" vif = [ "mac=00:16:3E:64:26:B6, bridge=xenbr0" ] hostname = "test1" ip = "192.168.83.36" netmask = "255.255.255.0" gateway = "192.168.83.1" disk = [ "phy:xbd/test1.sda2,sda2,w", "phy:xbd/test1.sdb2,sdb2,w", "phy:xbd/test1-swap.sda1,sda1,w", "phy:xbd/test1-swap.sdb1,sdb1,w" ] root = "/dev/md0 ro" extra = "md=0,/dev/sda2,/dev/sdb2 md=1,/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1" ==================================== root@xenhost:~# xm create test1 -c Using...

..., This morning I received this notification from mdadm: This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm running on server-mail.mydomain.kom A Fail event had been detected on md device /dev/md1. Faithfully yours, etc. In /proc/mdstat I see this: Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[2](F) sda2[0] 77842880 blocks [2/1] [U_] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 305088 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> Pls help me. What should I do? Thank you very much, -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 10:23:49...

...dd - mdadm --create /dev/md2 -R -l 1 -n 2 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 - array has been created and syncronized - pvcreate /dev/md2 - vgextend vg0 /dev/md2 and it looks fine: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 140488320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdd1[1] sdc1[0] 292961216 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 3148608 blocks [2/2] [UU] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # pvdisplay --- Physical volume --- PV Na...

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the md device, partitioning it and create fs on each partition created on md device: mdadm create...

...ly the filesystem must be able to deal with lots of directories, and lots of small files. The first "oddity", is that when I mount a newly formated ocfs2 fs, it already contains used space: [root@ocfs1 /]# df /cgp02 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb2 10710016 135004 10575012 2% /cgp02 The info for that partition: [root@ocfs1 /]# fsck.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdb2 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdb2: label: cgp02 uuid: ad 2e 20 38 60 70 45 b8 97 68 48 d7 b9 88 5e 59 number of blocks: 10710016 byte...

...l my data, I followed your suggestion, > and it looks like I'm making big progress. The system booted again, > though it feels a bit sluggish. Here's the current state of things. > > [root at alphamule:~] # cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] > md125 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] > 512960 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] > bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk > > md126 : inactive sda1[0](S) > 16777216 blocks super 1.2 > > md127 : active raid1 sda3[0] > 959323136 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [U_] > bitmap: 8/8...

...ouse a linux kernel cvs repository. The machine is a dual 733mhz p3 netfinity of some kind. 512M of mem. Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 16484504 4015876 11631240 26% / /dev/sda2 31079 3199 26276 11% /boot /dev/sdb2 16516084 32828 15644264 1% /disk/sdb2 /dev/sdc1 141905076 344080 137235980 1% /disk/sdc1 $ grep sd /etc/fstab /dev/sda1 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/sda3 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/sdb1 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/sda2 /boot ext3 defaults,rw 0 2 /dev/s...

Hey all, I just decided I was too much out of space on my normal Linux partition. I had a spare partition, so I mkfs.ext4'd it, created a directory 'wine' owned by me, moved all contents of ~/.wine to it, and ran a sudo mount -o bind /media/sdb2/wine /home/dazjorz/.wine. I proceeded to take a look inside and everything was, of course, just fine. When I ran "wine someAppThatHadAlwaysJustWorked.exe", I first got a crash in winedevice.exe, then in that app. Then I noticed that the partition /dev/sdb2 was mounted noexec, so I umount...

...rong) /dev/disk/by-id/: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_00000000 -> ../../sdb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_00000000-part1 -> ../../sdb1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_00000000-part2 -> ../../sdb2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_01000000 -> ../../sda lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_02000000 -> ../../sdd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 10:56 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_03000000 -> ../../sdc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar...