search for: vclock_non

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "vclock_non".

Did you mean: vclock_none
2018 Sep 17
11
[patch V2 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime() implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet another slightly different copy of the same code. Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines. If jump tables are disabled it adds yet another conditional to the existing
2018 Sep 14
0
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
...invalidated separately from the vsyscall_gtod_data sequence to store the fact in a separate variable. That's inefficient. Restructure the code so the vclock readout returns cycles and the conversion to nanoseconds is handled at the call site. If the clock gets invalidated or vclock is already VCLOCK_NONE, return U64_MAX as the cycle value, which is invalid for all clocks and leave the sequence loop immediately in that case by calling the fallback function directly. This allows to remove the gettimeofday fallback as it now uses the clock_gettime() fallback and does the nanoseconds to microseconds...
2018 Sep 14
24
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime() implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet another slightly different copy of the same code. Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines. If jump tables are disabled it adds yet another conditional to the existing
2018 Sep 14
24
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime() implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet another slightly different copy of the same code. Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines. If jump tables are disabled it adds yet another conditional to the existing
2018 Sep 14
0
[patch 02/11] x86/time: Implement clocksource_arch_init()
...inux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/irq.h> @@ -105,3 +106,18 @@ void __init time_init(void) { late_time_init = x86_late_time_init; } + +/* + * Sanity check the vdso related archdata content. + */ +void clocksource_arch_init(struct clocksource *cs) +{ + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode == VCLOCK_NONE) + return; + + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode >= VCLOCK_MAX) { + pr_warn("clocksource %s registered with invalid vclock_mode %d. Disabling vclock.\n", + cs->name, cs->archdata.vclock_mode); + cs->archdata.vclock_mode = VCLOCK_NONE; + } +}
2018 Sep 14
1
[patch 02/11] x86/time: Implement clocksource_arch_init()
...@@ -105,3 +106,18 @@ void __init time_init(void) > { > late_time_init = x86_late_time_init; > } > + > +/* > + * Sanity check the vdso related archdata content. > + */ > +void clocksource_arch_init(struct clocksource *cs) > +{ > + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode == VCLOCK_NONE) > + return; > + > + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode >= VCLOCK_MAX) { It should be '>' as VCLOCK_MAX == VCLOCK_HVCLOCK == 3 > + pr_warn("clocksource %s registered with invalid vclock_mode %d. Disabling vclock.\n", > + cs->name, cs->archdata.vclock...
2018 Sep 17
0
[patch V2 02/11] x86/time: Implement clocksource_arch_init()
...inux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/irq.h> @@ -105,3 +106,18 @@ void __init time_init(void) { late_time_init = x86_late_time_init; } + +/* + * Sanity check the vdso related archdata content. + */ +void clocksource_arch_init(struct clocksource *cs) +{ + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode == VCLOCK_NONE) + return; + + if (cs->archdata.vclock_mode > VCLOCK_MAX) { + pr_warn("clocksource %s registered with invalid vclock_mode %d. Disabling vclock.\n", + cs->name, cs->archdata.vclock_mode); + cs->archdata.vclock_mode = VCLOCK_NONE; + } +}
2017 Feb 08
0
[PATCH RFC 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method
...; + if (!sequence) + break; + + scale = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_scale); + offset = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_offset); + rdtscll(cur_tsc); + + current_tick = mul64x64_hi(cur_tsc, scale) + offset; + + if (READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence) == sequence) + return current_tick; + } + + *mode = VCLOCK_NONE; + return 0; +} +#endif notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void) { @@ -173,6 +217,10 @@ notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode) else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_PVCLOCK) cycles = vread_pvclock(mode); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_CLOCK + else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_HVCLO...
2017 Feb 08
3
[PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. I implemented the required support re-using pvclock_page VVAR. Simple sysbench test shows the following results: Before: # time sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=500000 run ... real 1m22.618s user 0m50.193s sys 0m32.268s After: # time sysbench
2017 Feb 08
3
[PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. I implemented the required support re-using pvclock_page VVAR. Simple sysbench test shows the following results: Before: # time sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=500000 run ... real 1m22.618s user 0m50.193s sys 0m32.268s After: # time sysbench
2017 Feb 09
0
[PATCH 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method
...(!sequence) + break; + + scale = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_scale); + offset = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_offset); + rdtscll(cur_tsc); + + current_tick = mul_u64_u64_shr(cur_tsc, scale, 64) + offset; + + if (READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence) == sequence) + return current_tick; + } + + *mode = VCLOCK_NONE; + return 0; +} +#endif notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void) { @@ -173,6 +205,10 @@ notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode) else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_PVCLOCK) cycles = vread_pvclock(mode); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE + else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_HVC...
2017 Feb 08
2
[PATCH RFC 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method
...READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence) == sequence) > + return current_tick; > + } Can you explain better what's going on here? What protocol does the hypervisor use to update this bizarro seqlock? What exactly does sequence==0 mean? > + > + *mode = VCLOCK_NONE; > + return 0; > +} > +#endif > > notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void) > { > @@ -173,6 +217,10 @@ notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode) > else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_PVCLOCK) > cycles = vread_pvclock(mode); > #endif &g...
2017 Feb 08
2
[PATCH RFC 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method
...READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence) == sequence) > + return current_tick; > + } Can you explain better what's going on here? What protocol does the hypervisor use to update this bizarro seqlock? What exactly does sequence==0 mean? > + > + *mode = VCLOCK_NONE; > + return 0; > +} > +#endif > > notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void) > { > @@ -173,6 +217,10 @@ notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode) > else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_PVCLOCK) > cycles = vread_pvclock(mode); > #endif &g...
2017 Feb 09
4
[PATCH 0/2] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. Implemented the required support. Simple sysbench test shows the following results: Before: # time sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=500000 run ... real 1m22.618s user 0m50.193s sys 0m32.268s After: # time sysbench --test=memory
2017 Feb 09
4
[PATCH 0/2] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. Implemented the required support. Simple sysbench test shows the following results: Before: # time sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=500000 run ... real 1m22.618s user 0m50.193s sys 0m32.268s After: # time sysbench --test=memory
2017 Mar 03
4
[PATCH v3 0/3] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, merge window is about to close so I hope it's OK to make another try here. Changes since v2: - Add explicit READ_ONCE() to not rely on 'volatile' [Andy Lutomirski] - rdtsc() -> rdtsc_ordered() [Andy Lutomirski] - virt_rmb() -> smp_rmb() [Thomas Gleixner, Andy Lutomirski] Thomas, Andy, it seems the only blocker for the series was the ambiguity with TSC page read algorithm.
2017 Mar 03
4
[PATCH v3 0/3] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, merge window is about to close so I hope it's OK to make another try here. Changes since v2: - Add explicit READ_ONCE() to not rely on 'volatile' [Andy Lutomirski] - rdtsc() -> rdtsc_ordered() [Andy Lutomirski] - virt_rmb() -> smp_rmb() [Thomas Gleixner, Andy Lutomirski] Thomas, Andy, it seems the only blocker for the series was the ambiguity with TSC page read algorithm.
2017 Feb 14
6
[PATCH v2 0/3] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, while we're still waiting for a definitive ACK from Microsoft that the algorithm is good for SMP case (as we can't prevent the code in vdso from migrating between CPUs) I'd like to send v2 with some modifications to keep the discussion going. Changes since v1: - Document the TSC page reading protocol [Thomas Gleixner]. - Separate the TSC page reading code from
2017 Feb 14
6
[PATCH v2 0/3] x86/vdso: Add Hyper-V TSC page clocksource support
Hi, while we're still waiting for a definitive ACK from Microsoft that the algorithm is good for SMP case (as we can't prevent the code in vdso from migrating between CPUs) I'd like to send v2 with some modifications to keep the discussion going. Changes since v1: - Document the TSC page reading protocol [Thomas Gleixner]. - Separate the TSC page reading code from