search for: varienc

I'm trying to use R for some of the analysis shown in Box, Hunter and Hunter (1979, I believe) using the aov function. I'm using the first example in chapter 6, where they are determining the analysis of varience between 4 treatments. In this example, the are determineing the analysis between and within treatments, which I can get by aov(response~treatment+Error(treatment)) Where response is the response data (numeric) and treatment is the treatment type (Factor). In the next example, they determine th...

Dear Experts, In glim() of S Plus, one of the returned values is "var", the estimated variance matrix of coefficients. However, in glm() of R (there is no glim() in R), "var" is not one of the returned values. Anyone know what could I get the varience matrix of coefficients in glm() in R? As a novice in R and S+, I'd appreciate your help Sincerely, Charlie Liu -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info"...

...al7 webeval8 /MISSING LISTWISE /ANALYSIS webeval1 webeval2 webeval3 webeval4 webeval5 webeval6 webeval7 webeval8 /PRINT INITIAL EXTRACTION /PLOT EIGEN /CRITERIA FACTORS(8) ITERATE(25) /EXTRACTION PC /ROTATION NOROTATE /METHOD=CORRELATION . As mentioned the proportions of varience explained and the scree plot are identical. However SPSS produces this "Component Matrix" which we, in class, have been calling "the loadings": WEBEVAL1 -0.798 0.253 0.178 0.317 -0.370 0.167 -0.033 -0.037 WEBEVAL2 -0.764 0.487 0.026 0.188 0.186 -0.309 -0.108 -0.043...

...about 5 Minutes on a 750MHz machine. The fitting makes sense but is very bad due to the lack of flexibility. 4 knots take 27 Min to compute and 5 knots take more than 5 hours (I interrupted after that). I played around with pdMat, but actually it does not make sense to restrict the variance - co-varience matrix. Second example: In this case, we have about 800 children with measurements between 0 and 2.5 years. Unfortunatly, the number of the measurements as well as the timing differs a lot, it is only guranteed that each child is measured at least once in all of the 5 first quarters. Chosing...

I found I have ripped the same CD twice with different machines. Cannot remember when, why, or how, but anyway. I've been using jack, here is relevant output: first one: 01/|\enc/|\128/|\[coding @0.67× done,129kbit] 02/|\enc/|\128/|\[coding @0.69× done,124kbit] 03/|\enc/|\128/|\[coding @0.66× done,124kbit] <etc> econd one: 01/|\enc/|\128/|\[coding @5.50× done,116kbit]