search for: vaccinations

Hi I have data from 12 subjects. The measurement is log(expression) of a particular gene and can be assumed to be normally distributed. The 12 subjects are divided into the following groups: Infected, Vaccinated, Lesions - 3 measurements Infected, Vaccintaed, No Lesions - 2 measurements Infected, Not Vaccinated, Lesions - 4 measurements Uninfected, Not Vaccinated, No Lesions - 3 measurements

Hi So carrying on my use of analysis of variance to check for the effects of two factors. It's made simpler by the fact that both my factors have only two levels each, creating four unique groups. I have a highly significant interaction term. In the context of the experiment, this makes sense. I can visualise the data graphically, and sure enough I can see that both factors have different

WinXP, R-2.9.1 LS., I have been trying to solve a (for me) tricky issue. No matter what I've tried, I just can't find a way to do this. This is the issue: I have a text file (ansi text) "titles.txt" with lines of text; here is an example of such a file: >>>>> a brief history of polio vaccines anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations early warning

Hi all, I have just uploaded the hbim package. This package does calculations related to the Hill/Bliss independence model as applied to mulitcomponent vaccines. Specifically, the package caculates expected relative risk and proportion protected assuming normally distributed log10 transformed antibody dose for a several component vaccine. It uses Hill models for each component which are combined

Hi all, I have just uploaded the hbim package. This package does calculations related to the Hill/Bliss independence model as applied to mulitcomponent vaccines. Specifically, the package caculates expected relative risk and proportion protected assuming normally distributed log10 transformed antibody dose for a several component vaccine. It uses Hill models for each component which are combined

dear list, i just found this post in the archive: ---------------- On 23-Apr-05 Bill.Venables at csiro.au <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> wrote: >:* -----Original Message-----*>:* From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> *>:* [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >> 1FuckingPrettyRose >> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters." >> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow! >> "Sorry, you cannot use punctuation."

Hi, I want asterisk to call a person on the phone for monitoring the refrigerator storing vaccines. I am clueless where to look. Can someone clue me in ? Thanks, balu raman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071017/923a7b49/attachment.htm

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, February 2, 2015 5:26 pm, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>>> >>> Let???s flip it around: what???s your justification *for* weak >>> passwords? >>> >> You don't

Dear R-experts, The forest.rma() function from the metafor package creates nice forest plots for presenting the results of a meta-analysis. These plots can be annotated for e.g. giving names to the columns. E.g. as in the documentation of the package: data(dat.bcg) ### meta-analysis of the log relative risks using a random-effects model res <- rma(ai=tpos, bi=tneg, ci=cpos, di=cneg,

Hi All, I would like to use anonymous cvs, but it appears not to be working (again?). There was a discussion back in Jan-Feb about whether to continue supporting it, but it seemed that Tony Rossini got it working and the discussion left off there. Did someone decide to disable it, or is it just not working properly? Here's the details: $ cvs -d

> On Feb 2, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > should a software > vendor make their code stop working for you because they think you > aren't working hard enough? When the consequence of widespread bad security is botnets and all the ills that derive therefrom ? DDoS armies, spam, etc. ? then yes, I think we do need to raise the

...te: > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch. > > Why? It's not just an imperfect analogy it really doesn't work on closer scrutiny. Malware itself is not a good analog to antigens. Vaccinations provide immunity to only certain kinds of antigens, and only specific ones at that. Challenge-Response, which is what a login password is, is about user authentication it is not at all meant or designed to provide immunity from malware. That we're trying to use it to prevent infections is more...

If you are interested in the following position, please contact Vladimir Svetnik at Vladimir_svetnik at merck.com. Date: Nov 18, 2015 Location: Rahway, NJ, US Associate Principal Scientist, Biostatistics-BIO004396 Description Merck & Co., Inc. Kenilworth, N.J., U.S.A. known as Merck in the United States and Canada, is a global health care leader with a diversified portfolio of prescription

Hello, I am using odesolve to simulate a group of people moving through time and transmitting infections to one another. In Matlab, there is a NonNegative option which tells the Matlab solver to keep the vector elements of the ODE solution non-negative at all times. What is the right way to do this in R? Thanks, Jeremy P.S., Below is a simplified version of the code I use to try to do this,

On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. > > Other than DDoS which is a problem of engineering design of how the network operates (untrusted anything can talk to untrusted

The Gottardo lab at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle has an opening for a programmer. To apply: https://erecruit.fhcrc.org/psp/RECRUIT/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/HRS_HRAM.HRS_CE.GBL?Page=HRS_CE_JOB_DTL&Action=A&JobOpeningId=24122&SiteId=2&PostingSeq=1 The position description is below: About Us Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, home of three Nobel laureates,

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. >> >> Other than

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is no inconvenience. What is the inconvenience of encrypting your device

Hello All, ? Am replicating in R an analysis I did earlier using SAS. See this as a test of whether I'm ready to start using R in my day-to-day work. ? Just finished replicating a Kaplan Meier analysis. Everything seems to work out fine except for one thing. The 95% CI around my estimate for the median is substantially larger in R than in SAS. For example, in SAS I have a median of 3.29 with a