search for: va2

...re in flight, which is why you need a system-defined intrinsic.) So a kernel function like this: void foo(__global int*A) { __local int vint; __local int *vpint; __local int const *vcpint; __local int volatile vvint; int a = A[0]; vint = a; vvint = a; int a2 = vint; int va2 = vvint; barrier(CLK_LOCAL_MEM_FENCE); A[0] = a2 + va2; } is translated to this, which does pass through Clang, with __local meaning attrib addrspace(2): extern __local void * __get_work_group_local_base_addr(void); // intrinsic void foo(__global int*A) { __local struct __local_vars_s {...

.... I narrowed it down to lld/Writer.cpp:getFileAlignment (). (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? Or Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the difference rather than adding the large value? Thanks A. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > I am trying to build llvm-gcc4 on a amd64. I had to add the attached > patch to get the build system to select the correct library. Now the Applied. > build fails while compiling a code that has __builtin_va_copy. The > attached test.i fails with: > > cc1: ../../trunk/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:443: llvm::Value* >

...> > So a kernel function like this: > > void foo(__global int*A) { > __local int vint; > __local int *vpint; > __local int const *vcpint; > __local int volatile vvint; > int a = A[0]; > vint = a; > vvint = a; > int a2 = vint; > int va2 = vvint; > barrier(CLK_LOCAL_MEM_FENCE); > A[0] = a2 + va2; > } > [Villmow, Micah] This example is incorrect. There is a race condition between the writes to vint and vvint and the reads from vint/vvint. The reason being is that all threads in a work-group share the memory that v...

I am trying to build llvm-gcc4 on a amd64. I had to add the attached patch to get the build system to select the correct library. Now the build fails while compiling a code that has __builtin_va_copy. The attached test.i fails with: cc1: ../../trunk/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:443: llvm::Value* TreeToLLVM::Emit(tree_node*, llvm::Value*): Assertion `(isAggregateType(((exp)->common.type)) == (DestLoc

...pp:getFileAlignment (). > > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > Or > > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the difference rather than adding the large value?...

Hello, I have installed samba-vscan module but when I try to read a test file: May 24 12:14:12 va2 smbd_vscan-clamav[15035]: ERROR: file /home/testav/eicar.com not found, not readable or an error occured why ? my smb.conf for homes: [homes] comment = home of %U, %u read only = No valid users = %U create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0775 browsea...

...> > > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > > > Or > > > > Should it be cast to a signed integ...

...corresponding to d$treatment == "C" from all values in order to get the difference between the treatments. If I do that by hand, it will look like: va <- rep(d$value[d$treatment == "C"], 3) # don't need to rep because R would do the recycling for me anyways d$value - va va2 <- rep(d$value2[d$treatment == "C"], 3) d$value2 - va2 This works because the data frame is sorted in the right way and all cases are present. Furthermore, it would be a bit elaborative if you want to that for more than a couple of columns and it is not very error prone nor scalable (...

Hi... I have one 2 data set with 3 variables and 4 observations. I want to combine the two data sets. I tried with merge but it gives only the common values. I need common values and and remaining values also. Please help me? this is my data set dataset:1 name va1 va2 AA 10 100 BB 20 200 CC 30 300 DD 40 400 dataset:2 name va1 va2 AA 36 444 BB 10 111 CC 20 222 DD NA 333 Please reply me..................................... -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-new-row-in-to-an-existing-data-set-in-R-Language-tp4644855.html...

...> (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > > > > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > > > > > > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > > > > > Or > >...

...to lld/Writer.cpp:getFileAlignment (). > > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > Or > > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the difference rather than adding the large value? > > > > Thanks > &gt...

...(). > > > > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > > > Or > > > > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the difference...

hi there, I have a dataframe in the shape vA1, vA2,..., vA11, vB1, vB2,..., VB11,......., VP1, VP2,...., VP11 (so 16 times a sequence of 11 variables) I am trying to build a double loop so that i can apply the function (i-1)*v(i) to the first 10 variables, then the same for the next 10 variables, etc... 16 times. I have tried the following with no...

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Peter Collingbourne > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 2:56 PM > To: David Neto > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] OpenCL support > > Hi David, > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:14:42AM -0500,

...> > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ()) > > > > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value… > > > > > > > > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ? > > > > Or > > > > Sho...

...return 1; + const uint64_t *p1 = __map_domain_page(pfp1); + const uint64_t *p2 = __map_domain_page(pfp2); + int rc = memcmp(p1, p2, PAGE_SIZE); + + unmap_domain_page(p2); + unmap_domain_page(p1); + + return rc; } static inline int tmem_pcd_cmp(void *va1, pagesize_t len1, void *va2, pagesize_t len2) @@ -271,54 +269,58 @@ static inline int tmem_pcd_cmp(void *va1, pagesize_t len1, void *va2, pagesize_t return 1; } -static inline int tmem_tze_pfp_cmp(struct page_info *pfp1, pagesize_t pfp_len, void *tva, pagesize_t tze_len) +static inline int tmem_tze_pfp_cmp(struct page...

Hi David, On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:14:42AM -0500, David Neto wrote: > >> It > >> seems it would be a good idea to transform the code so that uses of x > >> become loads and stores from memory, and the address for that memory > >> is returned by a builtin function that itself is dependent on work > >> group ids. > >> > >> I'm

...t/mpl/assert.hpp:56:58: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_MPL_AUX_ASSERT_CONSTANT' # define BOOST_MPL_AUX_ASSERT_CONSTANT(T, expr) enum { expr } ^ cliques.cpp:53:19: error: expression is not assignable p = edge(*va1, *va2, g); ~ ^ cliques.cpp:54:25: error: member reference base type 'mpl_::assert_arg_pred_not<boost::detail::is_iterator_traversal<boost::random_access_traversal_tag>>::<anonymous enum at rbgl_trimmed_boost_1_49_0/boost/mpl/assert.hpp:149:5>' is not a stru...

Hi there, I'm not able to get winbind to work, although searched google and studied and tried nearly every howto and forum entry on the net the last week.... it simply doesn't work and I don't understand why.... My Samba3-Domain SUPZ (samba & ldap Linux PDC, Windows Clients) works perfektly with all ldap users, groups (linux and from windows) and computer accounts (Win2000 WS).