thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number> [Nov 2020]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Moshtaghi, Alireza via llvm-dev

2020-Nov-16 17:52 UTC

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

I can't send the exact objects, but I'll try to reproduce.

Thanks
A

On 11/16/20, 9:48 AM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray at google.com>
wrote:

    NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




    On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:05 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza
    <Alireza.Moshtaghi at netapp.com> wrote:
    >
    > My target requires that text section be at 0x0 so "-Ttext
0x0" is passed to the linker.
    > When I link with gold, it goes through; but lld fails.
    > Instead of always returning the same calculation, when I change the
calculation to the following, it links:
    >   return first->offset + (os->addr > first->addr ?
    >                           os->addr - first->addr :
    >                           os->addr);
    >
    > There are other things in the build that I need to fix so I can't
tell if the result is correct yet though. Do you think this is correct?

    It is wrong. Can you upload a reproduce file somewhere?
    (LLD_REPRODUCE=/tmp/rep.tar ld.lld ....   or ld.lld
    --reproduce=/tmp/rep.tar)

    > Thanks
    > A
    >
    > On 11/15/20, 11:19 PM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray at
google.com> wrote:
    >
    >     NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >     Hi Alireza, getFileAlignment was renamed in Oct 2018. It seems that
    >     you may have sectionA and sectionB in one PT_LOAD while sectionB
has a
    >     lower address. This is invalid.
    >
    >     Can you provide more information about how you have a sectionB with
a
    >     lower address? Note that LLD has an error "unable to move
location
    >     counter backward for: ".
    >
    >     On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:20 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza via llvm-dev
    >     <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
    >     >
    >     > Hi
    >     >
    >     > I’m having a trouble linking a special program with lld and
the above error is generated.
    >     >
    >     > I narrowed it down to lld/Writer.cpp:getFileAlignment ().
    >     >
    >     > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version 10)
and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ())
    >     >
    >     > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when two
sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1) but
the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value…
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ?
    >     >
    >     > Or
    >     >
    >     > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the
difference rather than adding the large value?
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Thanks
    >     >
    >     > A.
    >     >
    >     > _______________________________________________
    >     > LLVM Developers mailing list
    >     > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
    >     > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
    >
    >
    >
    >     --
    >     宋方睿
    >


    --
    宋方睿

Moshtaghi, Alireza via llvm-dev

2020-Nov-16 18:31 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

Actually it is the combination of -Ttext 0x0 and --no-rosegment that cause the
problem. You can reproduce using any c file using following:
clang test.c -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,-Ttext,0x0 -Wl,--no-rosegment

A

On 11/16/20, 9:52 AM, "llvm-dev on behalf of Moshtaghi, Alireza via
llvm-dev" <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org on behalf of llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:

    NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




    I can't send the exact objects, but I'll try to reproduce.

    Thanks
    A

    On 11/16/20, 9:48 AM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray at
google.com> wrote:

        NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.




        On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:05 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza
        <Alireza.Moshtaghi at netapp.com> wrote:
        >
        > My target requires that text section be at 0x0 so "-Ttext
0x0" is passed to the linker.
        > When I link with gold, it goes through; but lld fails.
        > Instead of always returning the same calculation, when I change the
calculation to the following, it links:
        >   return first->offset + (os->addr > first->addr ?
        >                           os->addr - first->addr :
        >                           os->addr);
        >
        > There are other things in the build that I need to fix so I
can't tell if the result is correct yet though. Do you think this is
correct?

        It is wrong. Can you upload a reproduce file somewhere?
        (LLD_REPRODUCE=/tmp/rep.tar ld.lld ....   or ld.lld
        --reproduce=/tmp/rep.tar)

        > Thanks
        > A
        >
        > On 11/15/20, 11:19 PM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray at
google.com> wrote:
        >
        >     NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >     Hi Alireza, getFileAlignment was renamed in Oct 2018. It seems
that
        >     you may have sectionA and sectionB in one PT_LOAD while
sectionB has a
        >     lower address. This is invalid.
        >
        >     Can you provide more information about how you have a sectionB
with a
        >     lower address? Note that LLD has an error "unable to move
location
        >     counter backward for: ".
        >
        >     On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:20 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza via
llvm-dev
        >     <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
        >     >
        >     > Hi
        >     >
        >     > I’m having a trouble linking a special program with lld
and the above error is generated.
        >     >
        >     > I narrowed it down to lld/Writer.cpp:getFileAlignment ().
        >     >
        >     > (Well, my local repository is from a while back (version
10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ())
        >     >
        >     > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset when
two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 – VA1)
but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound value…
        >     >
        >     >
        >     >
        >     > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ?
        >     >
        >     > Or
        >     >
        >     > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract the
difference rather than adding the large value?
        >     >
        >     >
        >     >
        >     > Thanks
        >     >
        >     > A.
        >     >
        >     > _______________________________________________
        >     > LLVM Developers mailing list
        >     > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
        >     > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
        >
        >
        >
        >     --
        >     宋方睿
        >


        --
        宋方睿

    _______________________________________________
    LLVM Developers mailing list
    llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
    https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

Fāng-ruì Sòng via llvm-dev

2020-Nov-16 18:38 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

This is a common pitfall: people think that .text is the first section
of the traditional concept "text segment" (which does not apply with
LLD layout and GNU ld's -z separate-code layout)
You need to use --image-base=0

https://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#breaking-changes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:31 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza
<Alireza.Moshtaghi at netapp.com> wrote:>
> Actually it is the combination of -Ttext 0x0 and --no-rosegment that cause
the problem. You can reproduce using any c file using following:
> clang test.c -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,-Ttext,0x0 -Wl,--no-rosegment
>
> A
>
> On 11/16/20, 9:52 AM, "llvm-dev on behalf of Moshtaghi, Alireza via
llvm-dev" <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org on behalf of llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>     NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
>
>
>
>
>     I can't send the exact objects, but I'll try to reproduce.
>
>     Thanks
>     A
>
>     On 11/16/20, 9:48 AM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray at
google.com> wrote:
>
>         NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
>
>
>
>
>         On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:05 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza
>         <Alireza.Moshtaghi at netapp.com> wrote:
>         >
>         > My target requires that text section be at 0x0 so "-Ttext
0x0" is passed to the linker.
>         > When I link with gold, it goes through; but lld fails.
>         > Instead of always returning the same calculation, when I
change the calculation to the following, it links:
>         >   return first->offset + (os->addr > first->addr ?
>         >                           os->addr - first->addr :
>         >                           os->addr);
>         >
>         > There are other things in the build that I need to fix so I
can't tell if the result is correct yet though. Do you think this is
correct?
>
>         It is wrong. Can you upload a reproduce file somewhere?
>         (LLD_REPRODUCE=/tmp/rep.tar ld.lld ....   or ld.lld
>         --reproduce=/tmp/rep.tar)
>
>         > Thanks
>         > A
>         >
>         > On 11/15/20, 11:19 PM, "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray
at google.com> wrote:
>         >
>         >     NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     Hi Alireza, getFileAlignment was renamed in Oct 2018. It
seems that
>         >     you may have sectionA and sectionB in one PT_LOAD while
sectionB has a
>         >     lower address. This is invalid.
>         >
>         >     Can you provide more information about how you have a
sectionB with a
>         >     lower address? Note that LLD has an error "unable to
move location
>         >     counter backward for: ".
>         >
>         >     On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:20 AM Moshtaghi, Alireza via
llvm-dev
>         >     <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>         >     >
>         >     > Hi
>         >     >
>         >     > I’m having a trouble linking a special program with
lld and the above error is generated.
>         >     >
>         >     > I narrowed it down to lld/Writer.cpp:getFileAlignment
().
>         >     >
>         >     > (Well, my local repository is from a while back
(version 10) and for me it is lld/Writer.cpp:computeFileOffset ())
>         >     >
>         >     > Either way, where it is calculating the file offset
when two sections share same PT_LOAD, the formula used is off2 = off1 + (VA2 –
VA1) but the subtraction is causing a negative number, causing out of bound
value…
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > Should this be abs(VA2 – VA1) ?
>         >     >
>         >     > Or
>         >     >
>         >     > Should it be cast to a signed integer so we subtract
the difference rather than adding the large value?
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > Thanks
>         >     >
>         >     > A.
>         >     >
>         >     > _______________________________________________
>         >     > LLVM Developers mailing list
>         >     > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>         >     >
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     --
>         >     宋方睿
>         >
>
>
>         --
>         宋方睿
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     LLVM Developers mailing list
>     llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>     https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>

-- 
宋方睿

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

llvm dev - Nov 2020 - lld error: output file too large <some large number>

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

[llvm-dev] lld error: output file too large <some large number>

Possibly Parallel Threads