search for: v96

I have a V96 and have access to a V92 ON series UPS. I can tell you right off the oneac drivers don't see the family OZ with V96 responds with. I'd be willing to help out with this driver as I have a data center full of them plus one at home. However my C is weak. William

Hi, I've prepared patches for both LLVM and Clang to change the datalayout for R600. This may seem like a bold move, but I think it is warranted. R600/SI is a strange architecture in that it uses 64bit pointers but does not support 64 bit arithmetic except for load/store operations that roughly map onto getelementptr. The current datalayout for r600 includes n32:64, which is odd

...53:%f V54:%f V55:%f V56:%f V57:%f V58:%f V59:%f V60:%f V61:%f V62:%f V63:%f V64:%f V65:%f V66:%f V67:%f V68:%f V69:%f V70:%f V71:%f V72:%f V73:%f V74:%f V75:%f V76:%f V77:%f V78:%f V79:%f V80:%f V81:%f V82:%f V83:%f V84:%f V85:%f V86:%f V87:%f V88:%f V89:%f V90:%f V91:%f V92:%f V93:%f V94:%f V95:%f V96:%f V97:%f V98:%f V99:%f V100:%f V101:%f ',V102, weight, V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7, V8, V9, V10, V11, V12, V13, V14, V15, V16, V17, V18, V19, V20, V21, V22, V23, V24, V25, V26, V27, V28, V29, V30, V31, V32, V33, V34, V35, V36, V37, V38, V39, V40, V41, V42, V43, V44, V45, V46, V47, V48, V49, V50...

...ear R user, After I imported data (csv format) in R, I called it out. But it is in non-numeric format. Then using "as.numeric" function. However, the output is really awful !!!!! > PE[1,90:99] V90 V91 V92 V93 V94 V95 V96 V97 V98 V99 1 16.8467742 17.5853166 19.7400328 21.7277241 21.5015489 19.1922102 20.3351524 18.1615471 18.5479946 16.8983887 > as.numeric(PE[1,90:99]) [1] 11 10 11 10 11 9 10 9 9 8 How can I solve the above problem?? Thanks so much! Jessica...

...t;> V58:%f V59:%f V60:%f V61:%f V62:%f V63:%f V64:%f V65:%f V66:%f V67:%f >> V68:%f V69:%f V70:%f V71:%f V72:%f V73:%f V74:%f V75:%f V76:%f V77:%f >> V78:%f V79:%f V80:%f V81:%f V82:%f V83:%f V84:%f V85:%f V86:%f V87:%f >> V88:%f V89:%f V90:%f V91:%f V92:%f V93:%f V94:%f V95:%f V96:%f V97:%f >> V98:%f V99:%f V100:%f V101:%f ',V102, weight, V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, >> V7, V8, V9, V10, V11, V12, V13, V14, V15, V16, V17, V18, V19, V20, >> V21, V22, V23, V24, V25, V26, V27, V28, V29, V30, V31, V32, V33, V34, >> V35, V36, V37, V38, V39, V40, V41, V42, V4...

...quot;v49" "v50" "v51" "v82" "v83" "v84" "v85" "v86" "v87" "v88" "v89" "v90" "v91" "v92" "v93" "v94" "v95" [96] "v96" "v97" "v98" "v99" "v100" "v101" "v102" "v103" "v104" "v105" "v106" "v107" "v108" "v109" "v110" "v111" "v112" "v113" &qu...

...scalarized where the index into the vector is a function argument and could be set to any value. (scalar_repl_store_delete.ll): target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f80:128:128-v16:16:16-v24:32:32-v32:32:32-v48:64:64-v64:64:64-v96:128:128-v128:128:128-v192:256:256-v256:256:256-v512:512:512-v1024:1024:1024--a64:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64" define void @test_fn(<2 x i32>* %src, <2 x i32>* %results, i32 %alignmentOffsets) nounwind alwaysinline { entry: %sPrivateStorage = alloca [3 x <2 x i32>], a...

...V56:%f V57:%f > V58:%f V59:%f V60:%f V61:%f V62:%f V63:%f V64:%f V65:%f V66:%f V67:%f > V68:%f V69:%f V70:%f V71:%f V72:%f V73:%f V74:%f V75:%f V76:%f V77:%f > V78:%f V79:%f V80:%f V81:%f V82:%f V83:%f V84:%f V85:%f V86:%f V87:%f > V88:%f V89:%f V90:%f V91:%f V92:%f V93:%f V94:%f V95:%f V96:%f V97:%f > V98:%f V99:%f V100:%f V101:%f ',V102, weight, V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, > V7, V8, V9, V10, V11, V12, V13, V14, V15, V16, V17, V18, V19, V20, > V21, V22, V23, V24, V25, V26, V27, V28, V29, V30, V31, V32, V33, V34, > V35, V36, V37, V38, V39, V40, V41, V42, V43, V44, V45, V46...

...V36, V37, V38, V39, V40, V41, V42, V43, V44, V45, V46, V47, V48, V49, V50, V51, V52, V53, V54, V55, V56, V57, V58, V59, V60, V61, V62, V63, V64, V65, V66, V67, V68, V69, V70, V71, V72, V73, V74, V75, V76, V77, V78, V79, V80, V81, V82, V83, V84, V85, V86, V87, V88, V89, V90, V91, V92, V93, V94, V95, V96, V97, V98, V99, V100, V101, V102, V103, V104, V105, V106, V107, V108, V109, V110, V111, V112, V113, V114, V115, V116, V117, V118, V119, V120, V121, V122, V123, V124, V125, V126, V127, V128, V129, V130, V131, V132, V133, V134, V135, V136, V137, V138, V139, V140, V141, V142, V143, V144, V145, V146, V...

Hello.. How do I get str() to show all variables in a data frame? It seems to be "list output truncated" at about 99 variables, the data frame has over 600 but i can't seem to figure out how to show all variables, we see list.len() but again can't seem to figure this out - help will be appreciated. R> str(raw) 'data.frame': 1201 obs. of 626 variables: . . $

...V40, V41, V42, V43, V44, V45, V46, V47, V48, V49, V50, V51, V52, V53, V54, V55, V56, V57, V58, V59, V60, V61, V62, V63, V64, V65, V66, V67, V68, V69, V70, V71, V72, V73, V74, V75, V76, V77, V78, V79, V80, V81, V82, V83, V84, V85, V86, V87, V88, V89, V90, V91, V92, V93, V94, V95, V96, V97, V98, V99, V100, theta = lambda, scale = FALSE) Also I have found that the code breaks with number of variables greater than 97. For 97 and less it works fine. I have found that it breaks at the following line of the coxph function if (is.R()) m <- eval(temp, parent.frame())...

...a", "c", "g", "t"), class = "factor"), V95 = structure(c(3L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 4L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 4L, 3L, 2L), .Label = c("a", "c", "g", "t"), class = "factor"), V96 = structure(c(3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 4L, 3L, 4L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L), .Label = c("a", "c", "g", "t"), class = "factor"), V97 = structure(c(1L, 4L, 4L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 4L, 4L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 4L, 1...

Hi Tom, Thanks for working on this. The SLP-vectorizer thinks that %X %Y %Z and %W alias, so it tries to perform 4 scalar store operations (which is a bad idea). We need to figure out why AA thinks that X and Y may alias. Maybe there is a problem with the code that uses AA. Thanks, Nadav On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Hi, > >

...t; regions with multiple exits, but I don't think this helps any here. -Matt -------------- next part -------------- ; RUN: opt -S -structurizecfg -si-annotate-control-flow %s target datalayout = "e-p:32:32-p1:64:64-p2:64:64-p3:32:32-p4:64:64-p5:32:32-i64:64-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256-v512:512-v1024:1024-v2048:2048-n32:64" target triple = "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa-opencl" ; Function Attrs: nounwind define amdgpu_kernel void @multi_divergent_region_exit(i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %arg0, i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %arg1, i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture...

...__global int *output) { unsigned x = get_global_id(0); output[x] = input[x] + mask[get_local_id(0)]; } The IR for R600 now is: /// test.r600.ll /// target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-v16:16:16-v24:32:32-v32:32:32-v48:64:64-v64:64:64-v96:128:128-v128:128:128-v192:256:256-v256:256:256-v512:512:512-v1024:1024:1024-v2048:2048:2048-n32:64" target triple = "r600-none-none" ; Function Attrs: nounwind define void @convolve(i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture readonly %input, i32 addrspace(2)* nocapture readonly %mask, i32 addrspac...

...$ V90 : num 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 ... $ V91 : num 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 ... $ V92 : num 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ... $ V93 : num 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.998 ... $ V94 : num 0.28851 -0.00130 0.16621 0.19513 0.15963 ... $ V95 : num 0.2804 -0.1910 0.1693 0.2661 0.0609 ... $ V96 : num 0.290 -0.238 0.233 0.287 0.147 ... $ V97 : num 0.4559 -0.4030 0.0401 0.0264 -0.0420 ... $ V98 : num -1.64 -1.58 -1.15 -1.90 -1.48 ... $ V99 : num -1.47 -1.47 -1.19 -2.30 -1.85 ... $ V100: num -1.350 -1.517 -0.362 -2.072 -1.323 ... $ V101: num -1.070 -0.450 -1.064 -1.175 -0.4...

Hi, I've been playing around with the SLPVectorizer trying to get it to vectorize this simple program: define void @vector(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 %index) { entry: %0 = alloca [4 x i32] %x = getelementptr [4 x i32]* %0, i32 0, i32 0 %y = getelementptr [4 x i32]* %0, i32 0, i32 1 %z = getelementptr [4 x i32]* %0, i32 0, i32 2 %w = getelementptr [4 x i32]* %0, i32 0, i32 3

...], i64 2048, i1 false) Notice the presence of "align 1". I'm not sure which side is correct, isn't it equivalent (that is, this is the natural ABI alignment of that type)? Here is my datalayout: target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-n8:16:32:64-S128-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256-v512:512-v1024:1024" 2018-01-23 20:14 GMT-08:00 Daniel Neilson <dneilson at azul.com>: > Hi Alexandre, > The script uses extended-sed syntax, so you need to run sed with the -E > option. > > For example, when preparing the patch I created a file...

...presence of "align 1". I'm not sure which side is correct, > isn't it equivalent (that is, this is the natural ABI alignment of that > type)? > > Here is my datalayout: > > target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-n8:16:32:64- > S128-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256- > v512:512-v1024:1024" > > > 2018-01-23 20:14 GMT-08:00 Daniel Neilson <dneilson at azul.com>: > >> Hi Alexandre, >> The script uses extended-sed syntax, so you need to run sed with the -E >> option. >> >> For example,...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michele Scandale [mailto:michele.scandale at gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:29 AM > To: Micah Villmow > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Address space extension > > On 08/10/2013 02:47 PM, Micah Villmow wrote: > > Michele, > > The information you are trying to gather is fundamentally