search for: v4i

...)) || > > Does that look right to you? Yes, and it fixes the problem. What's your opinion about how TargetData and X86Subtarget define ABI alignment for SSE registers? I think that's suspect too. It's too bad we can't specify separate ABI alignments for v16i/f8, v8i/f16, v4i/f32 and v2i/f64 as we should probably set the ABI alignment to the element alignment. But I guess to be conservative we should set it to 8 bits. Unless I'm misunderstanding the purpose of the ABI alignment. -Dave

...nably reduced testcase for this, please add it. > What's your opinion about how TargetData and X86Subtarget define ABI > alignment > for SSE registers? I think that's suspect too. It's too bad we > can't specify > separate ABI alignments for v16i/f8, v8i/f16, v4i/f32 and v2i/f64 as > we > should probably set the ABI alignment to the element alignment. But > I guess > to be conservative we should set it to 8 bits. Unless I'm > misunderstanding > the purpose of the ABI alignment. The purpose of ABI alignment is to govern things...

I agree, that doesn't look right. It looks like this is what was intended: Index: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (revision 65000) +++ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (working copy) @@ -4903,9 +4903,9 @@ // resultant store does not need a higher alignment than

I got bit by this in LLVM 2.4 DagCombiner.cpp and it's still in trunk: SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSTORE(SDNode *N) { [...] // If this is a store of a bit convert, store the input value if the // resultant store does not need a higher alignment than the original. if (Value.getOpcode() == ISD::BIT_CONVERT && !ST->isTruncatingStore() && ST->isUnindexed()) {

...t;G=H:6QE(%L@)$U/4D4@/2!Y97, at 73L@9&\* M("`@(&-A<V4@(B0Q(B!I;@H)+6A\+2UH96QP*0H@("`@("`@("`@("!U<V%G M90H)("`@(&5X:70@,`H)("`@(#L["@DM;GPM+6YO+7)E<W1A<G0I"@D@("`@ M1%)94E5./7EE<PH)("`@(#L["@DM=GPM+79E<F)O<V4I"@D@("`@5D520D]3 M13UY97,*"2`@("`[.PH)+6=\+2UG8V]R92D*"2`@("!'0T]213UW:6YB:6YD M9`H)("`@(#L["@DM1WPM+6=C;W)E+6%L;"D*"2`@("!'0T]213UA;&P*"2`@ M("`[.PH@("`@("`@("U!?"TM875T:&9I;&4I"B`@("`...

All, using Samba as an AD (2k12) domain member in Stretch (2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u4) with tdb as default and rid as domain backend. No overlapping. Everything works fine. Setup was done as in the wiki [1]. If you're connecting from a Windows 10 client and do not add dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind refresh tickets = Yes to