search for: v4

Hi, I have a column (V4) in a midi event list which includes tone pitch names, i.e. "A4, E4, C#4, A3...": > compo[1:10,] V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 1 1 1 0 A4 96 2 0 2 1 1 0 E4 96 2 0 3 1 1 0 C#4 96 2 0 4 1 1 0 A3 96 2 0 5 1 3 0 B4 96 1 0 6 1 3 0 E4 96 1 0 7 1...

...something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration > Current <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283> 158786 > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/order/1314> 2012-06-20 03:39:48 2:15:27 > Previous <http://llvm.org/perf/db_defau...

...ling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >> >> lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> >> >> Run Order Start Time Duration >> Current <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283> 158786 >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/order/1314> 2012-06-20 03:39:48 2:15:27 >> Previous <http://l...

...bots are >> showing slower compile times for many tests. >> >> Ciao, Duncan. >> >> On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >>> >>> lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> >>> >>> Run Order Start Time Duration >>> Current <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283> 158786 >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/order/1314> 2012-06-20 03:39:48 2:15:27 >>> Pr...

...wer compile times for many tests. >>> >>> Ciao, Duncan. >>> >>> On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >>>> >>>> lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> >>>> >>>> Run Order Start Time Duration >>>> Current <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283> 158786 >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/order/1314> 2012-06-20 03:39:48 2:15:2...

...-1.1.11 instead of a windows installation that I keep on a VM. I used 'winemaker ./' and then 'make' and that's what I got: Code: szczerb at nomad ~/projekty/wine/plansza $ make wineg++ -c -mno-cygwin -I. -o main.o main.cpp /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:170: error: ::snprintf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:171: error: ::vfscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:172: error: ::vscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2...

...isn't too newbie. I used the sample data from Table 1.1 in "Manly (1986/1994) Multivariate Statistical Methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall" on sparrow body measurements. I rescaled the data to mean 0 and SD 1, and the covariance matrix is: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V1 1.0000000 0.7349642 0.6618119 0.6452841 0.6051247 V2 0.7349642 1.0000000 0.6737411 0.7685087 0.5290138 V3 0.6618119 0.6737411 1.0000000 0.7631899 0.5262701 V4 0.6452841 0.7685087 0.7631899 1.0000000 0.6066493 V5 0.6051247 0.5290138 0.5262701 0.6066493 1.0000000 Now when I call princom...

Here is what I tried: optdata = read.csv("K:\\MerchantData\\RiskModel\\AutomatedRiskModel\\soptions.dat", header = FALSE, na.strings="") optdata attach(optdata) for (i in 1:length(V4) ) { x = read.csv(V4[[i]], header = FALSE, na.strings="");x } And here is the outcome (just a few of the 60 records successfully read): > optdata = > read.csv("K:\\MerchantData\\RiskModel\\AutomatedRiskModel\\soptions.dat", > header = FALSE, na.strings="") &...

On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, > > I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest > LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on > http://188.40.87.11:8000 > <http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median>. > > Especially, I also evaluated ourr187102 patch file that avoids expensive > failure string operations in normal execution. Specifically, I evaluated > two cases for it: > > Polly-NoCodeGen: clang -O3 -load LLVMPo...

...also evaluated our r187102 patch file that avoids expensive failure string operations in normal execution. Specifically, I evaluated two cases for it: Polly-NoCodeGen: clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median Polly-Opt: clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/18?compare_to=11&baseline=11&aggregation_fn=median The "Polly-NoCodeGen" case is mainly used to compare the compile-time...

...lly, the factor loadings are different. I did real dataset(n=264), however, I had an extremely different from R and SAS. Why this things happened? Which software is correct on? Thanks in advance, - TY #R code with example data # A little demonstration, v2 is just v1 with noise, # and same for v4 vs. v3 and v6 vs. v5 # Last four cases are there to add noise # and introduce a positive manifold (g factor) v1 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,4,5,6) v2 <- c(1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1,3,4,3,3,3,4,6,5) v3 <- c(3,3,3,3,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,5,4,6) v4 <- c(3,3,4,3,3,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,1...

...:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >> >> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >> LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on >> http://188.40.87.11:8000 >> <http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median>. >> >> Especially, I also evaluated ourr187102 patch file that avoids expensive >> failure string operations in normal execution. Specifically, I evaluated >> two cases for it: >> >> Polly-NoCodeGen...

Dear community, I've check it while working, but just to reassure myself. Let's say we have 2 models: model1 <- lm(vdep ~ log(v1) + v2 + v3 + I(v4^2) , data = mydata) model2 <- lm(vdep ~ log(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4^2, data = mydata) So in model1 you really square v4; and in model2, v4*^2 *doesn't do anything, does it? Model2 could be rewritten: model2b <- lm(vdep ~ log(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4, data = mydata) and nothing changes, doesn...

I am learning five mlogits as follows v1.model<-mlogit(v1~1|v2+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v1.data, reflevel="1") v2.model<-mlogit(v2~1|v1+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v2.data, reflevel="1") v3.model<-mlogit(v3~1|v1+v2+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v3.data, reflevel="1") v4.model<-mlogit(v4~1|v1+v2+v3+v5, data=mlogit.v4.data, reflevel="1") v...

hi all i'm trying to use smbclient v3 with a samba server v4 configured as ad with anonymous login it works; but it doesn't using a user i get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE the pc isn't in the domain; but i tried from a non domain pc with smbclient v4 and it works i tried some commands smbclient -L <ip> -U <user> -W <domain> smbcli...

Dear R Users, I have the following data frame: v1 <- c(rep(10,3),rep(11,2)) v2 <- sample(5:10, 5, replace = T) v3 <- c(0,1,2,0,2) df <- data.frame(v1,v2,v3) > df v1 v2 v3 1 10 9 0 2 10 5 1 3 10 6 2 4 11 7 0 5 11 5 2 I want to add a new column v4 such that its values are equal to the value of v2 conditional on v3=0 for each subgroup of v1. In the above example, the final result should be like df$v4 <- c(9,9,9,7,7) > df v1 v2 v3 v4 1 10 9 0 9 2 10 5 1 9 3 10 6 2 9 4 11 7 0 7 5 11 5 2 7 I tried the following commands...

If you look at the structure, you'll see: > x$V4 <- 0 > str(x) `data.frame': 4 obs. of 4 variables: $ V1: int 1 2 3 4 $ V2: int 5 6 7 8 $ V3: int 9 10 11 12 $ V4: num 0 Don't know if this is the intended result. In any case, you're probably better off using data.matrix, as > data.matrix(x) V1 V2 V3 V4 1 1 5...

...,1,1),ncol=3,byrow=T)) z=as.data.frame(matrix(c(1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,2, 1,2,2, 1,1,1),ncol=3,byrow=T)) for(i in letters[24:26] ) assign( i, subset(get(i), select=-c(V1)) ) x y z And I figured how to do further processing using functions: myfunc<-function(DF){ DF$V4<-DF$V2+DF$V3 return(DF) } for(i in letters[24:26] ) assign( i, myfunc(get(i))) But if I want to do a rather simple calculation and store it as a new column in each data frame such as x$V4<-x$V2+x$V3 y$V4<-y$V2+y$V3 z$V4<-z$V2+z$V3 is there a simpler way to do this than building a fu...

Hi. I have tried to use Package "SEM". As a learning, I try to convert a program running well of EQS which is as follows to SEM: ### EQS ### /SPECIFICATION CAS=100; VAR=5 MAT=COR; ANA=COR; /EQUATIONS V1=*F1+E1; V2=*F1+E2; V3=*F1+*F2+E3; V4=**F1+*F2*E4; V5=*F2+E5; /VAR E1 TO E5=*; F1*1.0; F2=1.0; /COV E1,E2=*; F1,F2=*: /PRINT FIT ALL; /MATRIX ...... /END This is the converted SEM program. ### data.mh<-matrix(c( 1.00,0,0,0, 0, 0.38,1.00,0,0, 0, 0.52,0.28,1.00,0,0, 0.55,0.32,0.38,1.00,0, 0.36,0.40,0.48,0.31,1.00 ),ncol=5,byrow=T) m...

Il giorno mer 19 dic 2018 11:46:56 CET, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:31:38 +0000 > Andrea Zagli via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi all >> >> i'm trying to use smbclient v3 with a samba server v4 configured as ad >> >> with anonymous login it works; but it doesn't using a user >> >> i get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE >> >> the pc isn't in the domain; but i tried from a non domain pc with >> smbclient v4 and it works > > I think you have ans...