search for: usertagging

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 599520 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 599520 4.4.0-1 Failed to add fixed version '4.4.0-1' to 599520: Not altering archived bugs; see

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 532603 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 532603 4.4.0-1 Bug #532603 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.2-1: incorrectly calls network-script Marked as fixed in

user pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org usertag 271051 + close-after-first-upload usertag 326817 + probably-unreproducible usertag 331297 + probably-fixed usertag 321154 + probably-fixed usertag 327493 + pending-in-svn usertag 342249 + pending-in-svn usertag 321157 + pending-in-svn usertag 323698 + pending-in-svn thanks Hi! I'm user-tagging some of the bugs in the bts so we can keep a

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 728743 331.20-1 Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms Marked as

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was debian at abeckmann.de). > usertags 669005 piuparts Bug#669005: uninstallable on sid (might just need require a rebuild) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: piuparts. > affects 669005 + shogun-python-static shogun-python-modular

Looking through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xen I think it would be useful to add some usertags, in particular to easily filter for toolstack specific (i.e xend) bugs. I think we can use the pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org namespace for this -- what do you think? Ian.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:16:49PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Looking through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xen I > think it would be useful to add some usertags, in particular to easily > filter for toolstack specific (i.e xend) bugs. I've never seen the use for this. The kernel team tried and it did not work well. The release team however uses them and like it.

On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 13:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:16:49PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Looking through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xen I > > think it would be useful to add some usertags, in particular to easily > > filter for toolstack specific (i.e xend) bugs. > > I've never seen the use for this. I was

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > found 712376 4.1.4-4 Bug #712376 [src:xen] xen FTBFS with current gcc-4.8 Marked as found in versions xen/4.1.4-4. > tags 712376 + sid jessie Bug #712376 [src:xen] xen FTBFS with current gcc-4.8 Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > user debian-gcc at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-gcc at lists.debian.org (was bigon at debian.org).

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-security at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-security at lists.debian.org (was carnil at debian.org). > usertags 776319 + tracked There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: tracked. > tags 776319 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #776319 [src:xen] CVE-2015-0361 Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream. > retitle

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 477525 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 477525 4.4.0-1 Bug #477525 [src:xen] xend with network-route fails to start, missing $vifnum Marked as

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 502123 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 502123 4.4.0-1 Bug #502123 [src:xen] xen-utils-unstable: Debian patch breaks paravirtualized guest initrd

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 494727 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 494727 4.4.0-1 Bug #494727 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.2-1: Fail to define a new domain. Marked as fixed in

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # As per Moritz, not blockers > user release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian.org at packages.debian.org (was adam at adam-barratt.org.uk). > tag 609531 + squeeze-ignore Bug #609531 [xen] CVE-2010-4255: 64-bit PV xen guest can crash host by accessing hypervisor per-domain memory area Added tag(s)

user debian-release at lists.debian.org usertag 469013 -goal-python2.5 retitle 469013 Python API memory handling bug in unused code path found 469013 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 thanks Hi, the code that exhibits the buggy PyObject_NEW/PyMem_DEL behaviour (in xen-unstable-3.0-unstable+hg11561/tools/pygrub/src/fsys/ext2/ext2module.c) is not actually compiled and the results shipped[1]. As such,

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

Source: xen Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111022 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory `/build/xen-njlTaX/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/check' > PYTHON=python2.6

Package: xen Version: 4.1.0-3 Severity: important Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian patch just passes -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and -Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter to avoid build failures,

Package: xen-utils-4.1 Version: 4.1.4-4 Severity: normal User: mayhem at forallsecure.com Usertags: mayhem xenbaked crashes with exit status 139. We confirmed the crash by re-running it in a fresh debian unstable installation. The attachment [1] contains a testcase (under ./crash) crashing the program. It ensures that you can easily reproduce the bug. Additionally, under ./crash_info/, we