Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "use_locking".
2020 May 27
2
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
...gcv* is:
> >
> > Issues:
> >
> > ** openblas 0.3.x x<7 is not thread safe if itself compiled for single thread
> > use and then called from multiple threads (unlike the reference BLAS, say).
> > 0.2.20 appears to be OK. For 0.3.x x>6 make USE_THREAD=0 USE_LOCKING=1
> > to make openblas ensures thread safety (currently unclear if USE_LOCKING
> > will be default from 0.3.7).
>
> Does this mean that single-threaded openblas should be built with
> USE_LOCKING=1 by default? Is there any upstream recommendation about
> this?
>
>...
2020 May 26
2
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
...erested, the issue Simon Wood reports with openblas
and *mgcv* is:
Issues:
** openblas 0.3.x x<7 is not thread safe if itself compiled for single thread
use and then called from multiple threads (unlike the reference BLAS, say).
0.2.20 appears to be OK. For 0.3.x x>6 make USE_THREAD=0 USE_LOCKING=1
to make openblas ensures thread safety (currently unclear if USE_LOCKING
will be default from 0.3.7).
and running `mgcv:::blas.thread.test()` (Simon's non-exported function
to test for problems) returns:
> mgcv:::blas.thread.test()
|...
2020 May 27
2
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 21:40, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks I?aki, that is exactly what i was looking for, esp the last
> option which I have now configured as an alias for easy remembering.
>
> I can answer the question re USE_LOCKING=1. I think that using both
> those options is required to get thread-safety even if openblas was
> compiled for single thread use. I don't know to what extent Simon has
> engaged with upstream on this etc.
I've seen that there is a brief note about this in the project's wiki....
2020 May 27
0
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
Thanks I?aki, that is exactly what i was looking for, esp the last
option which I have now configured as an alias for easy remembering.
I can answer the question re USE_LOCKING=1. I think that using both
those options is required to get thread-safety even if openblas was
compiled for single thread use. I don't know to what extent Simon has
engaged with upstream on this etc.
All I know is that using the openblas shipped with Fedora for R is
currently a recipe for disa...
2020 May 27
0
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
...orts with openblas
> and *mgcv* is:
>
> Issues:
>
> ** openblas 0.3.x x<7 is not thread safe if itself compiled for single thread
> use and then called from multiple threads (unlike the reference BLAS, say).
> 0.2.20 appears to be OK. For 0.3.x x>6 make USE_THREAD=0 USE_LOCKING=1
> to make openblas ensures thread safety (currently unclear if USE_LOCKING
> will be default from 0.3.7).
Does this mean that single-threaded openblas should be built with
USE_LOCKING=1 by default? Is there any upstream recommendation about
this?
--
I?aki ?car
2020 May 27
0
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
Thanks (again) I?aki.
There was a typo in my reply above. I should have said: I *can't*
answer the question re USE_LOCKING=1.
Those other suggestions are really helpful too; I really didn't
understand what the difference was (I'm still not clear what the
differences are between say openblas-openmp and openblas-openmp64),
but I did get R to pass mgcv's thread safe test with both
openblas-openmp and blis-ope...
2020 May 27
1
Changing the BLAS from openblas on a F32 box
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 23:03, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks (again) I?aki.
>
> There was a typo in my reply above. I should have said: I *can't*
> answer the question re USE_LOCKING=1.
:)
> Those other suggestions are really helpful too; I really didn't
> understand what the difference was (I'm still not clear what the
> differences are between say openblas-openmp and openblas-openmp64),
> but I did get R to pass mgcv's thread safe test with both
>...
2007 Jun 01
0
USB phone -- Help
...d a sms to my friends.
I installed gammu. Pls see below for installed rpm.
[root at mailgw ~]# rpm -qa |grep gammu
gammu-1.11.0-1.el5.rf
here's my /etc/gammurc file.
[gammu]
port = /dev/ttyUSB0
;model = 6110
connection = dlr3
;synchronizetime = yes
;logfile = gammulog
;logformat = textall
;use_locking = yes
;gammuloc = locfile
;startinfo = yes
;gammucoding = utf8
;rsslevel = teststable
;usephonedb = yes
[gammu1]
port = /dev/ttyUSB1
;model = 6110
connection = dlr3
;synchronizetime = yes
;logfile = gammulog
;logformat = textall
;use_locking = yes
;gammuloc = locfile
;startinfo = yes
;gammucoding...
2006 Mar 22
5
gnokii on FreeBSD 6.0 and Dell PE 2850
Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060322/b3ddf5ba/attachment-0001.pgp