search for: usbdevfs_control

...raw usb 2-3: USB disconnect, device number 5 usb 2-3: new low speed USB device number 6 using ohci_hcd usb 2-3: New USB device found, idVendor=0764, idProduct=0501 usb 2-3: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=1, SerialNumber=0 usb 2-3: Product: CP550HG usb 2-3: Manufacturer: CPS usb 2-3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -110 usb 2-3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 usb 2-3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 129 rq 6 len 9 ret -6 2 usb 2-3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 129 rq 6 len 376...

Hi, I keep getting the following messages (or similar) in my syslog: Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.921566] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -110 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.972569] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -75 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.976568] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret -71...

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.086977] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret -75 A...

Hi all, after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: [...] [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [256789.640795] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [257771.412836] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [258932.684998] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL fa...

...sb/003/001", O_RDONLY) = 4 ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_IOCTL, 0x7fff23b78170) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) close(4) = 0 open("/dev/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) open("/dev/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDONLY) = 4 ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff23b78110) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff23b78110) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) ioctl(4, USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff23b78110) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) close(4) = 0 open("/dev/bus/usb/006/002", O_...

Hello list, I have a "Salicru SPS One 700VA" in a Debian Wheezy server. I configured a week ago, it works well, but today it start to show "UPS salicru at 192.168.x.x:3493 is unavailable" And I got this in the system logs: # dmesg [147080.501925] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147080.503913] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147089.509450] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147089.511436] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL...

...evice 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub ... Bus 001 Device 003: ID 1a40:0201 Terminus Technology Inc. FE 2.1 7-port Hub Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0665:5161 Cypress Semiconductor USB to Serial The problem is that I have some failed messages: # dmesg ... [90941.136274] usb 1-3.7: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [91382.412323] usb 1-3.7: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [92037.704329] usb 1-3.7: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [92250.832357] usb 1-3.7: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL fa...

...Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret -110 Error -110 is indeed a timeout, but it is not directly coupled to pollinterval. NUT 2.7.1 increases most of the USB tim...

...newhidups -a mgeups /usr/sbin/upsd -u root /usr/sbin/upsmon /usr/sbin/upsmon NUT operates correctly, shutting down the server after 4 minutes without power. However I'm seeing 25 to 50 messages logged each day in /var/log/messages of the form: Jun 21 16:11:40 pastis kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -110 Jun 21 16:46:29 pastis kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret -110 I read in Arnaud's message http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsuse...

...= 0 write(2, " 0.575600\t", 12) = 12 write(2, "Checking USB device [1d6b:0001] "..., 42) = 42 open("/dev/bus/usb/009/001", O_RDWR) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) open("/dev/bus/usb/009/001", O_RDONLY) = 4 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff2c4c0080) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff2c4c0080) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0x7fff2c4c0080) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) close(4)...

...4:56 PM, Fabio Cecamore wrote: > Hi all, > after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: > > [...] > [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 "ret -110" is a timeout, I believe. > Obviously the usb ports work good, I think is a bug in the driver or something like.. Could be a cable problem, too. What version of NUT? We increased the timeout in 2.7.1. Also, devices that ta...

...edback Arnaud. I have to admit that past days im having the syslog with a lil more activity from the new usb attached unit (ellipse ASR 1000 VA) Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.23 (2.0.2-pre2) Detected an UPS: MGE UPS SYSTEMS/ELLIPSE usb 3-1: control timeout on ep0in usb 3-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 10 ret -110 usb 3-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 10 ret -32 usb 3-1: usbfs: process 3225 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use usb 3-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 10 ret -32 usb 3-1...

On Jan 12, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Ariel Wainer wrote: > On 11/01/14 15:27, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Ariel Wainer wrote: >> >>> On 10/01/14 01:53, Charles Lepple wrote: >>>> I am curious about why the Interrupt Out packet is sent by the Windows software if it isn't to turn off the UPS. Is it possible to do some more testing with

...ected to device 001/002 again as I ran the strace. The output is attached. That's strange. The return codes seem to imply that the requests are timing out, rather than there being a permissions problem: open("/dev/bus/usb/001/002", O_RDWR) = 4 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0xbff9a28c) = 4 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0xbff9a28c) = 26 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0xbff9a28c) = 4 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0xbff9a28c) = 26 ioctl(4, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_PVERSION or USBDEVFS_CONTROL, 0xbff9a28c)...

...-usb 0003:0D9F:0001.0009: hiddev0,hidraw2: USB HID v1.00 Device > [HID 0d9f:0001] on usb-0000:02:0b.0-1/input0 > usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial_generic > usbserial: USB Serial Driver core > > dmesg output every time I tried to start upsd: > > usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd lsusb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 > ret -110 > usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd lsusb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 > ret -110 > usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd lsusb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 > ret -110 > usb 4-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd lsusb rqt 128 rq 6...

Hi Charles >> Obviously the usb ports work good, I think is a bug in the driver or something like.. > Could be a cable problem, too. I'll try to change the USB cable but is hard to be fault, it's new.. > What version of NUT? We increased the timeout in 2.7.1. Network UPS Tools - Megatec/Q1 protocol USB driver 0.09 (2.6.5) > > Also, devices that talk to blazer_usb are

...XIO 80000400, flags 0, urb f710eec0, burb f79a32c0 wcusb: Error executing control: status=-6 wcusb: Failed to initialize proslic wcusb: Hardware intialization failed. cleanup Wildcard USB FXS Interface driver registered host/usb-uhci.c: ENXIO 80000480, flags 0, urb f79a32c0, burb f79a3540 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 4 rqt 128 rq 6 len 535 ret -6 host/usb-uhci.c: ENXIO 80000480, flags 0, urb f79a32c0, burb f79a3540 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 4 rqt 128 rq 6 len 9 ret -6 host/usb-uhci.c: ENXIO 80000480, flags 0, urb f79a3540, burb f79a32c0 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 4 rqt 128 rq 6...

The output of the ldd command is: root at minime:~# ldd /lib/nut/nutdrv_atcl_usb linux-gate.so.1 (0xb7722000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0xb76fe000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb76e2000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7536000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2

...bin.com/JWmnp8iW Graphs plotting the battery charge can be found here: https://screenshots.firefox.com/iyTY8fAIB2MjXMV5/openmediavault.local The battery charge drops suddenly when the UPS shuts down. When I power it on again, the batter starts charging from there. In the same instant of time, the USBDEVFS_CONTROL messages appear in the log: > Dec 2 18:39:59 openmediavault postfix/qmgr[2088]: 9E9F65001EB: > from=<xxxxx at gmail.com>, size=509, nrcpt=2 (queue active) > Dec 2 18:40:00 openmediavault postfix/smtp[22067]: 9E9F65001EB: > replace: header Subject: UPS notification from openm...

On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query.