search for: upsampler

The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely different, like SoXR. On 07/05/13 22:12, Hermann Weber wrote: > Dear Nikos, > > thank you very much for your advice! > > I am not a little bit new to C++, and experiments

Hello! I would like to know if it is possible to request encoding to a higher samplerate than the original data. For example my uncompressed data was 22 kHz, and I would now like to decode the compressed data to 48 kHz (to feed it to a filter which expects a high "input" format). Is this possible with Speex? Thank you. Hermie

I'm not using Opus at all. I'm just including its resampler in my own sources. It's not even a DLL; it's directly compiled together with the rest of my code. You need these sources from the opus-tools package (http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/): arch.h resample.c resample_sse.h speex_resampler.h stack_alloc.h In your project file, define these macros: #define

Dear Nikos, thank you very much for your advice! I am not a little bit new to C++, and experiments (like using another third party library) always turn out to be days of work for me. That is why I would first like to try Speex's new internal resampling function. I am currently still using the old 1.0.4 version. I have now downloaded the new 1.2rc1 version. Unfortunately it does not want

Hello Jean-Marc, I did some experiments with the fixed-point version of the resampler in SVN. Basically it works very well, great work! But I experienced a problem when upsampling audio data with slight clipping. This seems to cause an overflow somewhere, resulting in "cracks" in the output. I'm aware that the resampler hasn't been released yet, but I wanted to mention it. :-)

Hello, I have some progress for the NHW codec. I recently talked with a researcher that has some interest in the NHW codec.He has studied several directional wavelet transforms (notably HWD directional transform), and he came to the conclusion that directional transforms will bring marginal improvement, not significant in the case of my compression codec.This also confirms what I have read from

Hello Jean-Marc, thank you for your answer! > I'll look into this. There's basically no overflow prevention for now. > I'll think about how to add that without affecting performance too much > (on CPUs that don't have hardware saturation). I'm open to suggestions :-) I'm not sure if I can really help, but I did a few more tests. Reducing the volume of the input

Dear Nikos, thanks! But you use Opus only for resampling, not for entirely replacing Speex, don't you? Greetings! Hermie Am 07.05.2013 22:53, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same > interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) > Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely

----- Original Message ----- From: "Conrad Parker" <conrad at metadecks.org> To: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel at vb-audio.com> Cc: "Jean-Marc Valin" <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca>; <speex-dev at xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] SPEEX on iPhone ? > 2008/11/13 Vincent Burel

Can someone who really knows the Ogg command-line encoder, help recommend the best setting for 33.6k modem stereo music streaming? (56k doesn't count cuz many people's 56k modems don't work at a full 56k, and I want them to be able to surf CD Baby at the same time as listening. 2 minutes / 120 seconds of audio should be about 400k.) I'm at my wit's end: tried everything I

Hello all, It's me again.Just a quick message to tell that I finally do not agree that HEVC (don't have tested AOM AV1 for now) is better than the NHW codec at mid compression. Last night, I dowloaded 30 images of Star Wars Rogue One on the web and I made another comparison with x265 (HEVC) for mid compression (-l2 to h2 settings for the NHW codec). Visually, I prefer the results of NHW

Hi, I am trying to make a neural network learning a "noisy sine wave". Suppose I generate my data like so.. x <- seq(-2*pi, 2*pi, length=500) y <- sin(x) + rnorm(500, sd=sqrt(0.075)) I then train the neural net on the first 400 points using c <- nnet(as.matrix(x[1:400]),as.matrix(y[1:400]), size=3, maxit=10000, abstol=0.075, decay=0.007) Inspecting the fit of the training

Hi I have data that is sampled (in time) with a certain frequency and I would like to express this time series as a time series of a higher (or lower) frequency with the newly added time points being filled in with NA, 0, or perhaps interpolated. My data might be regularly or irregularly spaced. For example, I might have quarterly data that I would like to handle as a monthly time series with

Hello, I understand it would be better to post several messages with separate topics but I hope I don't cause too much mess if I put it all in a single message this time. To be clear, recently I've been testing Opus Tools under Windows and these are my questions/observations. ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps with Opusenc and then decoded

Hi. I was wondering if there was any interest in extending the flac container format to support sample rates above the 655k current limit. Please note this is not for using ridiculously high sample rate sourced audio for some imaginary audible benefit. I've been involved in some experimentation with offline upsampling in software prior to delivery to an external DAC as a way to bypass the

----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Chemeris" <Alexander.Chemeris at sipez.com> To: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel at vb-audio.com> Cc: "Conrad Parker" <conrad at metadecks.org>; <speex-dev at xiph.org>; "Jean-Marc Valin" <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:31 PM Subject: Re:

On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. What sine sweep exactly? How did you obtain it, and how exactly did you encode and decode it? Jan > The strange > thing was that even though the output wave file was at 48 kHz, it

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics