search for: upr20

...u have said a few days ago? Notice that a new minor release includes new drivers for new servers, so it is important to know if you can install at all the system on your server, before any updates ! Alain -- Administrateur Syst?me/R?seau Laboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructures (LPN/CNRS - UPR20) Centre de Recherche Alcatel Data IV - Marcoussis route de Nozay - 91460 Marcoussis Tel : 01-69-63-61-34

Bonjour, It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work. When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet arrives on the server. Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ? Thanks PS: no error with the compilation of the last source version of freeradius (3.0.7) --

Hi All, How to install and configure monitoring tools Nagios,lcinga,Zabbix and Ngnix on COS5 and COS6. -- *Thanks,* *Manikandan.C* *System Administrator*

Hi List Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will it be released ? Thanks Jatin

If you use the EPEL repository, please read https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-announce/2014-November/000032.html TL;DR: There are a large number of orphaned/unmaintained packages in EPEL across the 5, 6, and 7 trees. These packages will be removed from EPEL unless they are picked up by a packager. Packages that *depend* on an orphaned package will be removed as well to ensure

On a fully patched C7 machine... % cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) % cat /etc/os-release NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"

Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a ?crit : >> I would have assumed that this release would be "7.1.1503", and the URL >> >>on at least one mirror has: >> >> >> >>http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/ >> >> >> >>Guess if that's the new convention, I'll need to keep my ISO files >> >>sorted out

On 04/02/2015 04:43 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > >> On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in >>> /etc/os-release >>> >> In that particular place it is actually rather important,

Hi, http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and file reports. Dont use it in production. As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta builds from Red Hat and to report issues at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the release upsteam, and do it in

...1 Now, all CPUs are 64 bits capable, and Red Hat is looking for the professional and server market, where there is no more interest for 32 bits (memory limited even if there is PAE, UEFI and so on...) Alain -- Administrateur Syst?me/R?seau Laboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructures (LPN/CNRS - UPR20) Centre de Recherche Alcatel Data IV - Marcoussis route de Nozay - 91460 Marcoussis Tel : 01-69-63-61-34 ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:00:10 -0400 From: "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" <bobgoodwin at wildblue.net> To: centos at centos.o...