Hi, http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and file reports. Dont use it in production. As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta builds from Red Hat and to report issues at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the release upsteam, and do it in a manner that allows lots of people to get involved and track progress. Keep an eye out on posts on the centos-devel list to see how you can get involved and help with the CentOS Builds and testing process. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Am 11.12.2013 um 16:56 schrieb Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>:> Hi, > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ > > Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and > file reports. Dont use it in production. > > As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta > builds from Red Hat and to report issues at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the > release upsteam, and do it in a manner that allows lots of people to get > involved and track progress. Keep an eye out on posts on the > centos-devel list to see how you can get involved and help with the > CentOS Builds and testing process.cool! -- LF
Le 11/12/2013 16:56, Karanbir Singh a ?crit :> http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ > > Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and > file reports. Dont use it in production. > > As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta > builds from Red Hat and to report issues athttp://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the > release upsteam, and do it in a manner that allows lots of people to get > involved and track progress. Keep an eye out on posts on the > centos-devel list to see how you can get involved and help with the > CentOS Builds and testing process.There seems to be only x86_64 release ? That would be in the current trend... Alain -- Administrateur Syst?me/R?seau Laboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructures (LPN/CNRS - UPR20) Centre de Recherche Alcatel Data IV - Marcoussis route de Nozay - 91460 Marcoussis Tel : 01-69-63-61-34
Thanks for this, looking forward to kicking the tires to see what they did with GNOME 3. On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>wrote:> Hi, > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ > > Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and > file reports. Dont use it in production. > > As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta > builds from Red Hat and to report issues at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the > release upsteam, and do it in a manner that allows lots of people to get > involved and track progress. Keep an eye out on posts on the > centos-devel list to see how you can get involved and help with the > CentOS Builds and testing process. > > Regards, > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 11 december 2013 16:56 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public > > Hi, > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ > > Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and > file reports. Dont use it in production. > > As in the past, we highly encourage people to use the official beta > builds from Red Hat and to report issues at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the > release upsteam, and do it in a manner that allows lots of people to get > involved and track progress. Keep an eye out on posts on the > centos-devel list to see how you can get involved and help with the > CentOS Builds and testing process.I see nobody's asked when CentOS 7 will be out yet. ;-) Anyway, will be interesting to check out the "new" gnome. -- //Sorin
On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:> > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the > release upsteamIn the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there being speculation that building the next major release wouldn't be as troublesome, for various reasons[*]. Did that turn out to be true? [*] a) Improved procedures, b) grand works that, done once, don't need to be done over again as long as upstream doesn't change the world again, etc.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:> > > Am 14.12.2013 23:30, schrieb Les Mikesell: >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:35 PM, SilverTip257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In a way it's a shame... >>> At the same time I can see why RH is going x86_64 only ... much hardware in >>> data centers is 64bit capable and running 64bit OSes. >> >> This will probably be painful for people using LTSP to boot older thin >> clients even if they have a hefty server > > how should it be painful for anybody? > > * physical machine: use RHEL5/6, it is still supported > * server: user virtualization for a RHEL5/6 guestLTSP (Linux Terminal Server Project) isn't virtualization, it is network booting an assortment of desktops that can act as thin clients to your hefty server or run local apps over an NFS mount from the server. While there are ways to boot a different kernel on the clients, LTSP wants to boot the same one the server uses. And it is used in classrooms, etc.> in 2013/2014 there is no valid need for support 32bit > on a recent operating system while mosts users kicked > this legacy hardware 5-6 years ago for many reasonsSure if you buy a new server today you'd get 64 bit. But seriously, how many things do you do on you desktop that you couldn't do back when everything was 32 bit? And what can't you do with a 32bit X session running remote apps from a 64-bit server? So there is no reason to replace those boxes and either lagging behind in software or switching to a more accommodating Linux distribution will be painful. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:> > > so stay on RHEL6/CentOS6 until this old hardware dies > where is the problem?Google Chrome, etc.> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Life-cycle_dates > > *who* is forcing you to RHEL7?Nobody wants old desktop apps. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com