search for: uppers

#I would like to use the below data to make a scatter plot matrix with #code similar to that below the data #conceptually this is the right approach I think #thanks in advance melt.gg <- structure(list(stream = c("Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower", "Bonham Lower",

With main R releases only happening yearly in spring, now is good time to consider *and* discuss new features for what we often call "R-devel" and more officially is R Under development (unstable) (.....) -- "Unsuffered Consequences" Here is one such example I hereby expose to public scrutiny: A few minutes ago, I've committed the following to R-devel (the

Hi list, could anyone please educate me on the following: lst<-seq(47, 239, by=12) for(n in lst) { lower=n; upper=lower+10 for(i in lower+2 : upper) { print(paste(n, " i: ", i, " lower: ",lower, " upper :", upper)) } } does not stop when i = upper A while loop fixes this but, I still don't understand why the for loop doesn't stop

Dear R-helpers, the problem I'm facing today is to convince lattice to paint some areas in gray. The areas I would like to have in gray, are confidence bands I've googled around in the mailing list archives and eventually find some clues. This link is my starting point http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/07/04/15595.html I'm reproducing here the code for your convenience est

Hi, I noticed a minor flaw in integrate() from package stats: Taking up arguments lower and upper from integrate(), if (lower == Inf) && (upper == Inf) or if (lower == -Inf) && (upper == -Inf) integrate() calculates the value for (lower==-Inf) && (upper==Inf). Rather, it should return 0. Quick fix: ### old code ### ### [snip] else {

For a variety of displays (mosaicplots, barplots, ...) one often wants to either abbreviate or wrap long labels, particularly when these are made up of several words. In general, it would be nice to have a function, abbreviate.or.wrap <- function(x, maxlength=10, maxlines=2, split=" ") { } that would take a character vector or a list of vectors, x, and try to abbreviate or wrap

Dear R users, i try to integrate lgamma from 0 to Inf. But here i get the message "roundoff error is detected in the extrapolation table", if i use 1.0e120 instead of Inf the computation works, but this is against the suggestion of integrates help information to use Inf explicitly. Using stirlings approximation doesnt bring the solution too. ## Stirlings approximation lgammaApprox

I would like to set the 'xlab' on the 'upper' x axis. The following code shows roughly what I want by way of (one possible) expected behaviour. par(mar=c(5.1, 4.1, 5.1, 2.1)) plot(rnorm(10), rnorm(10), xlab="the lower one") axis(3, xlab="the upper one????") There are various other ways that could be expected to work, but hopefully the above is clear enough to

Dear R-helpers, I wish to place some text in a plot, at approx 10% of my upper xlim and approx 90% of my upper ylim, i.e. > plot(log(all$SR,10)~log(all$AREA,10)) > text(.1*max(xlim),.9*max(ylim),"text to be placed") (I know how to give absolute coordinates for text location, but I wish to use relative coordinates). My code (above) doesn't work because I don't know how

Full_Name: Volker Franz Version: 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Mac OSX / Debian Submission from: (NULL) (84.58.8.232) Hi there, the new version of plotCI (Version: 2.0.3 of gplots) produces errors if the upper or lower error bars should be omitted by passing NULL as an argument. Older versions of plotCI had no problem with this. Here is an example: library(gplots) means <- c(1,2,3,4,5) upperw

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

Hello, I am having difficulty dynamically building a query. I want to ensure that I''m using Active Record protection against SQL injection attacks. In PHP land, I would have built up the query in my logic & attempted to clean every variable - a bit tedious really. I want to be able to achieve something like: events = Event.find(:all, :conditions => [**DynamicallyBuiltQuery**

hello R users strange behavior of the integrate function! i assume this occurs because of the way in which the quadriture is set up! (any comments.) f=function(x){exp(-exp(-x)-5*x)/gamma(5)} xx=seq(from=-20, to=20, length.out=1000) plot(xx,f(xx),type="l") integrate(f, lower=-Inf, upper= 1) integrate(f, lower=-Inf, upper= 10) integrate(f, lower=-10, upper= 11) integrate(f,

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

Explicitly declare constants are unsigned long to address the following sparse warnings: warning: constant is so big it is long Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf108.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 2 +-

Hi, Would you help me solve the following question? Thanks. Question: If I try to set the probability=0.05 and find the approximate x. (The answer should be somewhere between 2.1782 and 2.1783.) I write about this R program as follows but I don¡¦t know how to get the value of x which is between 2.1782 and 2.1783. library(mvtnorm) value<-array(1000) a<-array(1000)

Dear useRs, i have certain commands for some operations in R. They are good if you have a small dataset but my dataset, apart from what i used in the recent past, is prety large. I want to convert these massive sets of commands into a simple loop. Your help is required on it thanks in advance eliza kindly note: "e" is matrix whose each column has to be executed into a distance vector

Dear all, I am using the nlsLM function to fit a Lorentzian function to my experimental data. The LM algorithm should allow to specify limits, but the upper limit appears not to work as expected in my code. The parameter 'w', which is peak width at half maximuim always hits the upper limit if the limit is specified. I would expect the value to be in-between the upper and lower limit with

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Hi, is there a way to place text at the upper left corner (or another corner) of the plot? I want to place it really at the upper left corner of the whole plot (the file I get), not at the upper left corner of the plot-region. I tried text() and mtext(), and corner.label() of the plotrix package but it didn't work out. thanks!