search for: uplink

I'm trying to implement direct_media between multiple peers and an uplink provider, all of whom have direct_media=yes configures. For originating calls to the uplink provider direct_media=yes works like expected. SIP flows through asterisk, rtp doesn't SIP: enduser <-> SBC <-> asterisk 13 <-> uplink RTP: enduser <-> SBC <-----------------...

...e call flow: AST-Sanset*CLI> -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 195.27.242.8: > requested format = g729, > requested prefs = (), > actual format = g729, > host prefs = (g729), > priority = mine -- Executing Goto("IAX2/comcentrixs-uplink-6", "sanset|944|1") in new stack -- Goto (sanset,944,1) -- Executing Macro("IAX2/comcentrixs-uplink-6", "stdexten") in new stack -- Executing Set("IAX2/comcentrixs-uplink-6", "LANGUAGE()=de") in new stack -- Executing SetMusicOn...

...hese point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis arises. Code follows: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit tc class add dev $DEV...

Hi I''m moving to hfcs (mostly succesfuly:) ), but I''ve encountered a strange problem: When I download something from this server using wget (one thread) via an idle uplink, I get no more than 130 kbit/s, and when I''m using prozilla (or start more wgets), I get about 200 kbit, but still it''s not all the link can do (240) - the rest remamins unused. Is this my fault or the qdisc? (I must tell that htb works fine - I get all the bandwidth I can no...

Dear friends: I was analizing the HTB script at "The ultimate traffic conditioner", at the Cookbook, at Lartc. I have a very basic question: First, it is defined the root htb qdisc, as expected; then, it is defined the main (parent) htb class, with the total uplink as rate, also as expected; then, they are defined 2 child clases: first of them has also the total uplink as rate (!) and second, has the 90% of the total uplink as rate (!). So, sum of child classes equals to 190% of the total uplink (and parent) rate. Why is this done that way?? I understand...

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority class with rate $[8*$UPLINK/10]kbit No class has any ceiling set (I think it defaults to the parent rate which would be ${UPLINK}kbit). Now my concern is how these are divided up. Shouldn''...

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d = dmax ? I’ve found this article too http://linux-ip.net/articles/hfsc.en/ And for example this line is quite diferent !...

...between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all station-originated frames to the adjacent bridge for frame processing and frame relay (including so-called 'hairpin' forwarding) and by steering and replicating frames received from the VEPA uplink to the appropriate destinations. A VEPA may be implemented in software or in conjunction with embedded hardware. In particular, the patch extends the Linux Ethernet bridge to act as (1) a VEPA - for this we have added VEPA forwarding functionality and added a configuration option for a VEPA up...

...between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all station-originated frames to the adjacent bridge for frame processing and frame relay (including so-called 'hairpin' forwarding) and by steering and replicating frames received from the VEPA uplink to the appropriate destinations. A VEPA may be implemented in software or in conjunction with embedded hardware. In particular, the patch extends the Linux Ethernet bridge to act as (1) a VEPA - for this we have added VEPA forwarding functionality and added a configuration option for a VEPA up...

...between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all station-originated frames to the adjacent bridge for frame processing and frame relay (including so-called 'hairpin' forwarding) and by steering and replicating frames received from the VEPA uplink to the appropriate destinations. A VEPA may be implemented in software or in conjunction with embedded hardware. In particular, the patch extends the Linux Ethernet bridge to act as (1) a VEPA - for this we have added VEPA forwarding functionality and added a configuration option for a VEPA up...

For easy reading: http://www.karthaus.nl/r/ Hi, We used to have 1 single ip range (1.1.1.0/24) that had one uplink to a = switch of the colocation provider. Recently we got a second range 2.2.2.0/24 and a redundant uplink = directly on two routers. But our switch does not have spanning tree = protocol support so we cannot use them redundantly. We have set up the switch to have a vlan for both networks like i...

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in 1:10 and 1:20, this works) As I''m somewhat new to this, I''m stuck and don''t know what I have...

...s a whole new world to me :) wondershaper.htb creates 3 HTB classes; 1:10 is high prio, 1:20 is bulk (default), and 1:30 is low priority. The classes are created as follows: ========================================================== tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb \ rate ${UPLINK}kbit \ burst 6k prio 1 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb \ rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit ceil ${UPLINK}kbit \ burst 6k prio 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb \ rate $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit ceil ${UPLINK}kbit \ burst 6k prio 2 ==========================...

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No ingress policing, no IMQ. On WAN interface, like in wondershaper and myshaper, I plan to have classes which handles interactive and bulk traff...

...an ESXi server, on top of it I have created one VM whose IP address is 192.168.79.1. I want to connect to the VM on ESXi server from my host machine but I am not able to do it. I have created a network "networkforSC" and I have pasted my xml file content below but I am not able to add any uplink (how to add it?) . Below is the xml file of my node as well as the network which I am creating on my ESXi server *<domain type='vmware'>* *<name>testNode</name>* *<uuid>50115e16-9bdc-49d7-f171-53c4d7f91710</uuid>* *<memory>1048576</memory>* *<cu...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: mzura...

...1214 -j MARK --set-mark 4 $IPTABLES -t mangle -A MANGLE_PREROUTING -p 6 -m length --length :64 -j MARK --set-mark 1 $IPTABLES -t mangle -A MANGLE_PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0 -j MARK --set-mark 3 Abstract of my TC script:- tc qdisc add $DEV root handle 1: htb default 40 # shape everything at $UPLINK speed - this prevents huge queues in the DSL modem that destroy latency tc class add $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit ceil ${UPLINK}kbit burst 12k # divide traffic into 4 classes with high prio class 1:10: tc class add $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate $[UPLINK/2]kbit ceil...

Hi everyone, I''m controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth gets limited then i''ve got trouble on that because my intention is  shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL).  Lately, I''m going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worr...

I am hoping that someone with more experience and knowledge than I can assist me in finding a solution ;) We have a RedHat AS4 box with 5 interfaces. Two interfaces serve two different networks and two interfaces connect to two different uplinks. The fifth interface is our management interface. Since a picture is worth a thousand words I attempted to come up with a diagram: http://studpup74.googlepages.com/networkproblem (I did not want to post this image to the list :) If anyone with this experience has a few moments to assist...

...ation would be to just plunk down the cash and do a Cisco system, but I'm relatively certain that would get shot down by finance. Any recommendations for a couple-hundred-port solution with VLANs, PoE, and QoS? Don't care much if it's in a single chassis or not, so long as it has Gbit uplinks. Thanks! -Ken