search for: unlink

...0.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-rw- 1 biolord bioinf 29610 Sep 19 05:26 mirror.log Using rsync -r --delete on server B for this dir works fine, also rsync -r --keep-dirlinks works OK (but no deletes, of couse). With rsync --keep-dirlinks -r --delete HOST:$ftp/software . I get: rsync: delete_one: unlink "/gaia/indata/software/PHYLIP/mirror.log" failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync: delete_one: unlink "/gaia/indata/software/PHYLIP/TOPO-1.0.0.tar.gz" failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync: delete_one: unlink "/gaia/indata/software/PHYLIP/TOPO-0.1.tar.gz"...

Hi, I try to delete the files in a directory. While the command invisible(lapply( list.files( "DeleteThis" ), function(x) file.remove(paste("DeleteThis", x, sep="/" )) )) works, I keep thinking that there should be a more direct command. "unlink" looks like a good candidate but whith this I only arrive to either delete the whole directory or nothing happens at all. Code: file.exists( "DeleteThis" ) # TRUE: folder is here (unlink( "DeleteThis/*.*" )) # 0, content doesn't get deleted (unlink(...

Hola, Dovecot: 2.2.16 (6bde7868cffd) That is the rename-it 2:2.2.16-1~auto+43 edition. In the beginning of syncing it caused scary things like: Apr 9 16:24:08 mail dovecot: dsync-server(username): Error: unlink(OX/dbox-Mails/u.10672) failed: No such file or directory Apr 9 16:24:08 mail dovecot: dsync-server(username): Error: unlink(ox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/u.10927) failed: No such file or directory Apr 9 16:24:08 mail dovecot: dsync-server(username): Error: unlink(OX/dbox-Mails/u.10839) failed: No...

!!! DON'T TRY THE CODE IN THIS EMAIL AT HOME !!! Well, unlink() does what it is supposed to do, so you could argue that there is nothing wrong with it. Also, nobody would call unlink() on "~", right? The situation is not so simple, however. E.g. if you happen to have a directory called "~", and you iterate over all files and directories t...

...text html latex example spl text html latex example summary.MCMCglmm text html latex ** building package indices ... * DONE (MCMCglmm) * creating vignettes ... OK * cleaning src * removing junk files unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/ residuals.MCMCglmm.R ~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/.DS_Store unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/prunePed.R unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/commutation.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/rtnorm.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/KPPM.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/cs_inversion.c~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/posterior.cor.R unlink MCM...

...text html latex example spl text html latex example summary.MCMCglmm text html latex ** building package indices ... * DONE (MCMCglmm) * creating vignettes ... OK * cleaning src * removing junk files unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/ residuals.MCMCglmm.R ~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/.DS_Store unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/prunePed.R unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/commutation.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/rtnorm.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/KPPM.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/cs_inversion.c~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/posterior.cor.R unlink MCM...

...text html latex example spl text html latex example summary.MCMCglmm text html latex ** building package indices ... * DONE (MCMCglmm) * creating vignettes ... OK * cleaning src * removing junk files unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/ residuals.MCMCglmm.R ~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/.DS_Store unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/prunePed.R unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/commutation.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/rtnorm.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/KPPM.R~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/cs_inversion.c~ unlink MCMCglmm_2.05/R/posterior.cor.R unlink MCM...

...var/tmp ID 271 top level 5 path .snapshots ID 278 top level 5 path .snapshots/5/snapshot ID 575 top level 5 path .snapshots/293/snapshot ... ... many, many more Further I recognize in /var/log/messages some btrfs - orphan related entries: Apr 17 09:06:57 ctrlaltdel kernel: [ 3120.205958] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Apr 17 09:10:04 ctrlaltdel kernel: [ 3307.607220] btrfs: unlinked 15 orphans Apr 17 09:11:04 ctrlaltdel kernel: [ 3367.233679] btrfs: unlinked 15 orphans Apr 17 09:11:44 ctrlaltdel kernel: [ 3407.023880] btrfs: unlinked 16 orphans Apr 17 09:11:51 ctrlaltdel kernel: [ 3414.172983] btrfs:...

It seems unlink doesn't work with wildcards in 2.5.0. I've tried R-2.5.0 under gnu/linux from source and the Mac binary from att research. Example: > dir() [1] "bgx.Rnw" "bgx.pdf" "run.1" > unlink("run.*",recursive=T) > dir() [1] "bgx.Rnw"...

I see the default behavior of unlink with respect to directories is changing in 1.2. This causes me a certain amount of difficulty: since the recursive argument is not supported in S I will need to start building up my compatibility library again (which is almost empty now). Instead of changing unlink's default behavior it might...

...version 2.5.1 using the Sun Studio 12 compilers on Sun Solaris 10 (SPARC). All tests using "make check" pass with a status of OK. However, the following section of "reg-tests-1.R" fails when I attempt to test after a build of either 2.6.0 or 2.6.1: ## regression tests for unlink and wildcards owd <- setwd(tempdir()) f <- c("ftest1", "ftest2", "ftestmore", "ftest&more") file.create(f) stopifnot(file.exists(f)) unlink("ftest?") stopifnot(file.exists(f) == c(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE)) unlink("ftest...

To clarify, these issues are about deleting the contents of the home directory, not the directory itself, which cannot be deleted by ordinary users on today's systems. Unfortunately this has to be fixed in the code that calls unlink(), such code must be aware of the expansions. The "R CMD build" case as you write has been fixed, if anyone finds any other instance of this problem in base R, please report, it will be fixed as well. The new argument "expand" has been added to unlink() to make these fixes e...

Hi Everyone ! I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go over 20 MB/s , transfering data using other protocols like FTP , rsync , rsync over ssh on any of these machines i can easily achieve 80 MB/s ,i also can get the same on

...ot;~/p4/r-packages/IREval/Users", recursive=T) [1] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/DESCRIPTION" [2] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/R/IREval.R" [3] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/Read-and-delete-me" [4] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/tests/general.R" > (unlink("~/p4/r-packages/IREval/Users", recursive=TRUE)) [1] 0 > dir("~/p4/r-packages/IREval/Users", recursive=T) [1] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/DESCRIPTION" [2] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/R/IREval.R" [3] "u0048513/p4/r-packages/IREval/Read-and-delete...

Hi, if you change unlink to ::unlink on that line, does it help? Ciao, Duncan. On 10/26/11 19:27, janarbek wrote: > Does someone have a solution for this problem ? > I am using gcc version 4.4.5 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.4.4-14ubuntu5) and I have tried > several versions of LLVM including llvm 2.9 final. I am getting sam...

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need r...

unlink fails to remove symbolic links. This is more prominent now -- when a package creates symbolic links during installation, 00LOCK is not removed. Martin > setwd(tempdir()) > fl <- tempfile(); file.create(fl) [1] TRUE > lnFile <- tempfile(); system(paste("ln -s", fl, lnFile)...

Hi, I am using btrfs for remote backups (via rsync), with daily and weekly snapshots. I see these messages in kern.log: Jul 18 07:09:43 backup1 kernel: [3437126.458374] btrfs: unlinked 9 orphans Jul 18 12:01:01 backup1 kernel: [3454604.905856] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Jul 18 13:01:51 backup1 kernel: [3458254.990199] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Jul 19 04:01:41 backup1 kernel: [3512244.236347] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Is this something I have to be afraid of ? Linux debian lenn...

Hi Duncan, unlink is a C function, right ? why need a :: ?  Or is there a class ?   --- On Wed, 10/26/11, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM build is failed giving Path.inc:714: error: ‘unlink’ was not declared in this scope To:...

Hi Guys, I was looking at the code of ext3 file system and found some strange implementation there : Can someone please let me know the validity of below statements : 1. I found that it might also happen that journal is aborted but not re-mounted 2. Journal gets aborted but it might be possible to mount it in read-write mode. 3. Can we write some data on the partition where journal is