search for: upg

Thanks for tip, Kenneth. Please find proper formatted logs here: https://pastebin.com/eXfNWBLu Dne 21.12.2018 v 17:18 Kenneth Porter napsal(a): > --On Friday, December 21, 2018 1:37 PM +0100 Miroslav Geisselreiter > <mg at intar.cz> wrote: > >> I am sorry logs are bad formatted I am trying again and hope it will be >> better. Otherwise lokk at link bellow or tell me

...ter wrote: > Thanks for tip, Kenneth. > Please find proper formatted logs here: > https://pastebin.com/eXfNWBLu This looks like a discussion of a similar problem.? There are two suggested solutions: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/454004/smbclient-not-able-to-connect-to-after-upgrade-to-rhel7

...to smb share from linux client: smbclient //NT4MEMBER/share1 -U NT4MEMBER\\user1 but from windows machine it is not possible. Correct command from linux client should be smbclient //NT4MEMBER/share1 -U NT4DOMAIN\\user1 (user is from NT4DOMAIN, not from NT4MEMBER) This command is not working after upgrade. Logs say something about crap domain: [26721]: pam auth crap domain: [NT4DOMAIN] user: user1 [26699]: pam auth crap domain: NT4DOMAIN user: user1 set_dc_type_and_flags_connect: DC for domain NT4DOMAIN claimed it was a DC for domain NT4MEMBER, refusing to initialize NTLM CRAP authentication f...

...NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY set_dc_type_and_flags_connect: DC for domain NT4DOMAIN claimed it was a DC for domain NT4MEMBER, refusing to initialize Dne 31.12.2018 v 19:41 Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > On 12/31/18 12:03 AM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: >> >> This command is not working after upgrade. Logs say something about >> crap domain: >> set_dc_type_and_flags_connect: DC for domain NT4DOMAIN claimed it was >> a DC for domain NT4MEMBER, refusing to initialize > > > What do you get from "wbinfo --ping-dc"? > > ______________________________...

On 1/1/19 12:21 AM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > # wbinfo --ping-dc > checking the NETLOGON for domain[NT4DOMAIN] dc connection to > "nt4member.intranet.xx" succeeded Well, the host where you ran that command thinks that "nt4member" is the DC.? Do you see anything in your configuration file that might indicate why?? You haven't given us enough information

On 1/2/19 12:09 PM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > some parameters from smb.conf: > [global] > ??? workgroup = NT4DOMAIN > ??? netbios name = nt4member > ??????? security = domain > ??????? passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://ldap1server.intranet.xx > ldap://ldap2server.intranet.xx" I'm not sure it makes sense to use "security = domain" with an ldap

On 1/3/19 6:09 AM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > Yes, I add this host with command: > net rpc join MEMBER -S NT4LIKEDOMAINSERVER -U root I don't have any NT4-style domains handy to test with, so I can't be very specific.? Your logs seem to indicate that Samba believes itself to be the best DC for the domain.? See what you get from: net rpc info net rpc testjoin If nothing

On 1/3/19 11:46 PM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > > Previously I deleted all files from /var/lib/samba, than set ldap > admin password: > smbpasswd -W > Than I re-join DC, it did not help. Shame.? I'm not really sure what else to try, beyond my previous suggestion that it doesn't make sense to be both a domain member and use an ldap passdb backend. Try reverting the

Dne 5.1.2019 v 0:46 Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > On 1/3/19 11:46 PM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: >> >> Previously I deleted all files from /var/lib/samba, than set ldap >> admin password: >> smbpasswd -W >> Than I re-join DC, it did not help. > > > Shame.? I'm not really sure what else to try, beyond my previous > suggestion that it doesn't

--On Friday, December 21, 2018 1:37 PM +0100 Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: > I am sorry logs are bad formatted I am trying again and hope it will be > better. Otherwise lokk at link bellow or tell me how to send logs > correctly. Copy them to a pastebin and post the link to the pastebin. Pastebin is ideal for log files, source code, and other text data

...rh:resourceFile My question revolves around 'User Private Groups'. I noticed my AD users UID's do not have matching GID's. I came across the following: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#id2596644 This seems to indicate I cannot implement UPG because Windows will not allow user and groups of the same name. >From an administrative point of view, how do I handle this? Should I be concerned about this? How will a non UPG setup be different for us Linux users who are accustomed to having private groups? Essentially, I'm trying to av...

...o a Windows NT Domain."? > Did you add this host to a Windows NT domain, using "net join ..."? > Yes, I add this host with command: net rpc join MEMBER -S NT4LIKEDOMAINSERVER -U root I tried to change "security = USER" but it did not help. I have to say that before upgrade samba from 4.7.1-9 to 4.8.3-4 I did not use and did not run winbind daemon. But now it is necessary to run winbind according to samba documentation: https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.8.0.html Domain member setups require winbindd ------------------------------------- Setups with &q...

On 12/31/18 12:03 AM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > > This command is not working after upgrade. Logs say something about > crap domain: > set_dc_type_and_flags_connect: DC for domain NT4DOMAIN claimed it was > a DC for domain NT4MEMBER, refusing to initialize What do you get from "wbinfo --ping-dc"?

Dne 4.1.2019 v 1:32 Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > On 1/3/19 6:09 AM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: >> Yes, I add this host with command: >> net rpc join MEMBER -S NT4LIKEDOMAINSERVER -U root > > > I don't have any NT4-style domains handy to test with, so I can't be > very specific.? Your logs seem to indicate that Samba believes itself > to be the best DC for

...is more logical and intuitive for the user. The share represents a logical disk with a fixed capacity, like any physical disk in the system. By changing quota.c to check group quota instead of user quota, I found an easy way to accomplish this. RedHat Linux works with the User Private Group scheme (UPG). Every user has a private group with the same name as the user itself and a default umask of 002. This allows for setting a quotum on the group, having user quota support completely switched off. Also, a quotum can be set on a group share which is writable for all members of that group. As an exa...

...bellow or tell me how to send logs correctly. Mirek 21.12.2018 v 13:19 Miroslav Geisselreiter: > Originally I posted this question at CentOS forum 20.12.2018. > https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=69193 > > Hi all, > > I am not able to mount samba shares after upgrading CentOS 7.5 to 7.6. > I have been searching and trying to configure samba and winbind but no > success. I find a lot of manuals and help pages about setting samba > and winbind for machine acting as AD DC member but almost nothing > about machine acting as NT4 style DC member a...

....4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts freeipa-server-common: ipa-server-common-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch ipa-server-dns-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts freeipa-server-dns: ipa-server-dns-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch this in .rpm I guess and started appearing after upg to 7.3. *freeipa* is naming convention Fedora uses, right? Some remnants rebase did not take care of? regards, L.

...nUnloadNow stub err:ole:CoUninitialize Mismatched CoUninitialize fixme:advapi:CheckTokenMembership (0x0 0xccb780 0x624c0c78) stub! fixme:shell:DllCanUnloadNow stub err:ole:CoUninitialize Mismatched CoUninitialize fixme:msi:msi_unimplemented_action_stub MigrateFeatureStates -> 76 ignored L"Upg rade" table values fixme:msi:ControlEvent_SpawnWaitDialog Doing Nothing fixme:msi:ControlEvent_SpawnWaitDialog Doing Nothing fixme:msi:msi_unimplemented_action_stub MigrateFeatureStates -> 76 ignored L"Upg rade" table values fixme:msi:ACTION_HandleStandardAction unhandled standa...

...arch has installed conflicts > freeipa-server-common: ipa-server-common-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch > ipa-server-dns-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts > freeipa-server-dns: ipa-server-dns-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch > > this in .rpm I guess and started appearing after upg to 7.3. > *freeipa* is naming convention Fedora uses, right? Some remnants > rebase did not take care of? upstream issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370134 Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part...

...amba.org >Subject: [Samba] ntlm_auth and high load fault > > >Hi! > >Here is situation: > >1. We decide to switch on "Auto proxy config" in our network (you know, >wpad.example.com, etc.) >2. After that there are lot of robots (checking for new >versions, upgrading, >esp. M$ upg) on client > computers start trying to fetch resources, but w/o any >authentication (or >I dont understand what is going on :). >3. Result is unxepected: alot of "requests in queue" to >ntlm_auth, because >of this squid restarts every > 2...