search for: unwelcoming

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 86 matches for "unwelcoming".

2015 Apr 02
8
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us
2015 Aug 03
1
unwelcome gthumb slideshow
I have a gif image in a folder. Whenever I have gthumb display it or a copy of it, gthumb goes into slideshow mode. Usually I can stop the show. It will not stop before going to the next image. but I only have a slideshow period to look at the troublemaker. If the troublemaker is last in the directory, I cannot stop the show without stopping gthumb. How do I make gthumb stop going into slideshow
2015 Apr 02
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's subscribers do you suppose that might be? (It is neither welcome nor unwelcome by me, as I've said before.)
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's >
2015 Oct 20
2
RFC: Second draft of an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Pasi Parviainen via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 14.10.2015 23:36, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > >> * **Be welcoming.** We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports >> people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not >> limited >> to members of any race,
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:12 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? Although most people in the world will privately complain the vast majority do not complain in public. Where is your contrary evidence that
2018 Oct 22
5
[fdo] Code of Conduct questions
Hi, I've cross-posted this to freedesktop@, as the xdg@ list is only used for actual specification development. On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 00:36, Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, we were thinking of asking if freedesktop would host Kazan (https://github.com/kazan-3d/kazan) for us, however some of our community members have objections with how freedesktop's
2018 Nov 30
8
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen ><jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading technical comments? This is all beyond me... Thanks, Davidlohr
2014 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] asan coverage
On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Then my question: will there be any objection if I disentangle AsanCoverage from ASan and make it a separate LLVM phase with the proper clang driver support? > Or it will be an unwelcome competition with the planned clang coverage? I don’t view it as a competition, but assuming that we both succeed in our
2017 Sep 27
2
disturbed legend in ggplot2
Dear friends - below is a subset of a much larger material showing two ways of generating two "lines". The intention is to have the colour reflect a variable, pH, but the legend is disturbed. The little part marked "3" above the colour scale is unwelcome. Why did it appear? How could I avoid it? I'm on Windows 7, R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) -- "Single
2015 Feb 13
1
Thread moderation and list etiquette (Reference - Another Fedora Decision)
...ith such intensity. This situation A large part of this is that some of the regular people are now using the list as a way to socialise and contribute 'me too' or 'yes/no' sort of comments that dont really have much relevance to the real thread. All of this not only makes the list unwelcoming to new users, it also dramatically drops the quality of conversation. If moderating is the only way to restore sanity and keep things productive for the folks bringing through conversations then so be it, we will start putting individual accounts on moderation. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389...
1998 Mar 09
1
bug in menu, readline
Neither do_menu nor do_readln (in src/main/scan.c) call the function InitConsoleGetchar. They need to do this to reset ConsolePrompt. If you use "scan" to read in data from the terminal, then ConsolePrompt is set to "n:" for some integer n and this prompt makes an unwelcome appearance when you use the "menu" or "readline" functions. Incidentally, could we
2012 May 25
1
klibc issues on armhf (not Debian/armel)
Hi, we?re currently seeing trouble with klibc on several architectures, cf. http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-May/003277.html and armhf is being one of them, when using klibc to compile mksh-static with it. I can look into it (asked zumbi for build-deps in a sid chroot on harris already), but not 100% sure I?ll find it, so more eyes on klibc would not be unwelcome ;-) maks, does klibc
2006 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
Hi Tanya, > > * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't > > that be llvm-1.9? > > We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build > llvm it will know its version 1.9. I think that's missing the point. Convention is the foo-4.2.tar unpacks to a directory called foo-4.2. It's a unwelcome surprise when it
2006 Nov 17
1
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
>>> * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't >>> that be llvm-1.9? >> >> We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build >> llvm it will know its version 1.9. > > I think that's missing the point. Convention is the foo-4.2.tar unpacks > to a directory called foo-4.2. It's a
2016 Dec 05
2
LMTP delivery honours .forward by default?
On 2016-12-04 23:18, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, MRob wrote: > >> I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by >> default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go. >> However, I'm seeing a .forward file being honoured by the LMTP >>
2008 Sep 19
2
Specific SIP answers on incoming calls?
Hi, when I still had ISDN, I was using Hangup(causecode) to send e.g. "Wrong number" to unwelcome callers. Meanwhile, I am only using SIP providers (no PSTN lines any more) and I would like to do similar, i.e. send specific SIP headers. Besides "wrong number", I would especially like to send 302 temp moved with a specified address to deflect certain calls. Is there any way to
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, April 2, 2015 2:55 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 13:08 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> CentOS releases are NOT the same as EUS and have never been .. yet that >> seems to be what people expect. We want there to be no doubt on this >> issue. > > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? > > If
2021 Feb 04
3
Challenging times in trying to access oracle Linux documentation
Good afternoon everyone, hope you all are well. Apologies if this is considered unwelcome -- asking oracle question in centos group -- but a lot of centos Vs oracle is going on here so hoping this will not be shot down. I am unable to access any of the oracle documentation I need, as it keeps on asking for support identifier number, which, as far as I can tell, is only available if I purchase an
2014 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] asan coverage
Regarding performance, I've made a simple coverage with counters and compared it with AsanCoverage. AsanCoverage produces code like this: mov 0xe86cce(%rip),%al test %al,%al je 48b4a0 # to call __sanitizer_cov ... callq 4715b0 <__sanitizer_cov> A simple counter-based thing (which just increments counters and does nothing else useful) produces this: incq 0xe719c6(%rip) The