search for: unwelcom

It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us

I have a gif image in a folder. Whenever I have gthumb display it or a copy of it, gthumb goes into slideshow mode. Usually I can stop the show. It will not stop before going to the next image. but I only have a slideshow period to look at the troublemaker. If the troublemaker is last in the directory, I cannot stop the show without stopping gthumb. How do I make gthumb stop going into slideshow

On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's subscribers do you suppose that might be? (It is neither welcome nor unwelcome by me, as I've said before.) Feed...

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's > subscribers do you suppose that might be? (It is neither welcome nor > unwelcome by me, a...

...everything after the second sentence seems pretty unrelated. E.g. one of the examples is "Posting (or threatening to post) other people's personally identifying information ("doxing")." - how does that fall under anything involving "be careful"? Similarly for "Unwelcome sexual attention." in what way does that involve "the words that you choose"; is there a choice of words that makes "Unwelcome sexual attention." any more or less acceptable? Same is true for " Repeated harassment of others.". Was there a typo and "Be kind...

On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:12 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? Although most people in the world will privately complain the vast majority do not complain in public. Where is your contrary evidence that this non-beneficial and illogical change is welcome by the majority...

Hi, I've cross-posted this to freedesktop@, as the xdg@ list is only used for actual specification development. On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 00:36, Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, we were thinking of asking if freedesktop would host Kazan (https://github.com/kazan-3d/kazan) for us, however some of our community members have objections with how freedesktop's

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen ><jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading technical comments? This is all beyond me... Thanks, Davidlohr

On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Then my question: will there be any objection if I disentangle AsanCoverage from ASan and make it a separate LLVM phase with the proper clang driver support? > Or it will be an unwelcome competition with the planned clang coverage? I don’t view it as a competition, but assuming that we both succeed in our plans, LLVM would then end up with two very similar solutions for code coverage. Does it really make sense to have two?

Dear friends - below is a subset of a much larger material showing two ways of generating two "lines". The intention is to have the colour reflect a variable, pH, but the legend is disturbed. The little part marked "3" above the colour scale is unwelcome. Why did it appear? How could I avoid it? I'm on Windows 7, R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) -- "Single Candle" All best wishes Troels Ring Aalborg, Denmark library(ggplot2) DF1 <- structure(list(P = c(0, 0.00222222222222222, 0.00444444444444444, 0.00666666666666667, 0.0088888888...

...ith such intensity. This situation A large part of this is that some of the regular people are now using the list as a way to socialise and contribute 'me too' or 'yes/no' sort of comments that dont really have much relevance to the real thread. All of this not only makes the list unwelcoming to new users, it also dramatically drops the quality of conversation. If moderating is the only way to restore sanity and keep things productive for the folks bringing through conversations then so be it, we will start putting individual accounts on moderation. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-09993...

Neither do_menu nor do_readln (in src/main/scan.c) call the function InitConsoleGetchar. They need to do this to reset ConsolePrompt. If you use "scan" to read in data from the terminal, then ConsolePrompt is set to "n:" for some integer n and this prompt makes an unwelcome appearance when you use the "menu" or "readline" functions. Incidentally, could we have a "title" argument and a dummy "graphics" argument for menu? This if for S-PLUS compatibility, if I may dare to raise the topic. Martyn -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....

...ures, cf. http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-May/003277.html and armhf is being one of them, when using klibc to compile mksh-static with it. I can look into it (asked zumbi for build-deps in a sid chroot on harris already), but not 100% sure I?ll find it, so more eyes on klibc would not be unwelcome ;-) maks, does klibc on armel build thumb or not, and does it differ from armhf in more than optimisation flags? (Does klcc use the same flags as klibc itself was built with?) Thanks, //mirabilos -- 16:47??mika:#grml? .oO(mira ist einfach gut....) 23:22??mikap:#grml? mirabilos: und dein bo...

...uot;llvm". Shouldn't > > that be llvm-1.9? > > We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build > llvm it will know its version 1.9. I think that's missing the point. Convention is the foo-4.2.tar unpacks to a directory called foo-4.2. It's a unwelcome surprise when it doesn't, e.g. unpacking foo-4.1.tar and foo-4.2.tar in the same directory for comparision, or worse unpacking foo-4.1.tar alongside your llvm work directory. Sure, it can be worked around, but even the Linux kernel followed this convention in the end. Please consider it for...

...t >>> that be llvm-1.9? >> >> We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build >> llvm it will know its version 1.9. > > I think that's missing the point. Convention is the foo-4.2.tar unpacks > to a directory called foo-4.2. It's a unwelcome surprise when it > doesn't, e.g. unpacking foo-4.1.tar and foo-4.2.tar in the same > directory for comparision, or worse unpacking foo-4.1.tar alongside your > llvm work directory. No its not. While this may be convention for other projects it has not been for llvm. Therefore, peopl...

On 2016-12-04 23:18, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, MRob wrote: > >> I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by >> default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go. >> However, I'm seeing a .forward file being honoured by the LMTP >>

Hi, when I still had ISDN, I was using Hangup(causecode) to send e.g. "Wrong number" to unwelcome callers. Meanwhile, I am only using SIP providers (no PSTN lines any more) and I would like to do similar, i.e. send specific SIP headers. Besides "wrong number", I would especially like to send 302 temp moved with a specified address to deflect certain calls. Is there any way to send a...

...t; > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 13:08 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> CentOS releases are NOT the same as EUS and have never been .. yet that >> seems to be what people expect. We want there to be no doubt on this >> issue. > > Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? > > If Centos is the same as RHEL then RH can loose valuable sales income > because customers, actual and potential, use free Centos. However if > Centos version numbers are vastly different from RHEL version numbers > and there is no reliable method of equatin...

Good afternoon everyone, hope you all are well. Apologies if this is considered unwelcome -- asking oracle question in centos group -- but a lot of centos Vs oracle is going on here so hoping this will not be shot down. I am unable to access any of the oracle documentation I need, as it keeps on asking for support identifier number, which, as far as I can tell, is only available if I...

...n Feb 17, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: >> > Then my question: will there be any objection if I disentangle >> AsanCoverage from ASan and make it a separate LLVM phase with the proper >> clang driver support? >> > Or it will be an unwelcome competition with the planned clang coverage? >> >> I don’t view it as a competition, but assuming that we both succeed in >> our plans, LLVM would then end up with two very similar solutions for code >> coverage. Does it really make sense to have two? > > > It depe...